Nom De Plume has a very interesting video on X about the former FBI Director James Comey’s 8647 threat and a comment during an interview made by the current FBI Director Kash Patel.
What did Patel mean when he said this?
26 Comments on Is the FBI’s Hoover Building Unsafe?
Comments are closed.
That building probably has more bugs than bricks.
while it is am actual bricks and mortal building, I don’t think they were considering physical structure when they said it was unsafe
Put NOTHING beyond the power crazed evil establishment deep state actors. They’ve been enjoying their egos far too long to give up their power now.
whatever is inside it is unsafe for real humans, you know – badge-*******
Keep in mind that for many years now the people who work in that ugly-ass building have complained about dampness and a growing mold problem that’s never been treated properly. It’s possible the place is unsafe because of mold.
I’m not suggesting this is the actual reason for the “unsafe” comment, I’m just putting on the list of possibilities.
Different Tim and Toby Miles, I believe you are correct!
I think that is why Dan had that response … he didn’t think Kash would say it out loud!
My thoughts are number one that was an activation code sent by a low man of the totem poll of the deep state. I’m still wondering what the significance of the different colored numbers are. That FBI building is unsafe because it has been infiltrated by a bunch of traitorous assholes that will go to war against patriots on command. That’s why Kash is moving them out and splitting them up.
Splitting them up will disrupt communications between players. They may have to resort to phone, email or text messages to coordinate their campaign to impede Trumps agenda. All of which are subject to monitoring. Who knows, there may already be a warrant by the FISA court to monitor all communications and meetings for these traitors.
OK, maybe not but it sure would be sweet karma. Still, it will be harder for them to plot when there are no secret rooms to hide in.
^^^ :…possible the place is unsafe because of mold.”
build a container around it and soak the building in Bleach Bit for a month or two.
don’t forget about the clintons and the fbi files that she demanded, then they want missing for an extended period, only to turn up later in the WH living room, with her fingerprints on them.
the mold has deep roots
tctsunami
Splitting the bad guys up would be a huge disruption. Stop and think how long the bad guys have had to put this in place. I like my theory. Needs more tin foil. Quite honestly I’ve read this theory before.
It’s existence and the existence of the FBI is a serious threat to the safety and security of Americans.
@MrLiberty:
Exactly right. (Rhetorical) Where in the U.S. Constitution can we find authorization for a police force at the fed level? (And don’t anybody try to hand me that ‘general welfare’ shit.)
Al, our founders realized our government would need to evolve. Please look at Article 1, Section 8. A lot of expansion of our government was done under the guise of the “Elastic Clause”.
I’m not saying I agree with all of it, but I do think the founders intentionally left room for justification.
Brad, I’ve looked at Article 1 Section 8 many, many times, and I read it all again just now.
What specifically do you identify as the “Elastic Clause”? It can only be this last one:
The ‘foregoing powers’ refers to the prior items in A1S8, and there are no items that can be stretched to authorize a general fed police agency such as the FBI. And if I’ve missed something elsewhere in the document (‘all other powers’) please point it out.
I might even agree that the FBI or similar agency is a good idea and ought to be in the list of permitted items. But it isn’t there. Therefore it needs to be added via Article V. And that hasn’t happened.
Section 16 I believe
Brad, Art. 1 goes up to Sect. 10, and all the others have fewer than that. I’d like to know what you are referring to, please.
Al, I have an X discussion about this topic saved on my work computer. It follows this train of thought for justification.
https://www.google.com/search?q=constitutional+justification+for+the+FBI&sca_esv=18271ee19c8fd584&sxsrf=AHTn8zqchL2WrobddkOlKE0vlV5kX8V43w%3A1747530590862&source=hp&ei=XjMpaKmKMoGm0PEPkZqB6Q4&oq=constitutional+justification+for+the+FBI&gs_lp=EhFtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1ocCIoY29uc3RpdHV0aW9uYWwganVzdGlmaWNhdGlvbiBmb3IgdGhlIEZCSTIHECMYJxjLBDIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRifBTIFECEYnwUyBRAhGJ8FMgUQIRifBTIFEAAY7wVIzvMBUPcNWKbhAXACeACQAQCYAesCoAGuLqoBCDAuMzUuMi4zuAEDyAEA-AEBmAIqoAKLMagCD8ICBxAjGCcY6gLCAgcQLhgnGOoCwgIEECMYJ8ICChAjGIAEGCcYigXCAg4QLhiABBixAxjRAxjHAcICCBAAGIAEGLEDwgIOEC4YgAQYsQMYgwEYigXCAhEQLhiABBixAxjRAxiDARjHAcICBRAAGIAEwgILEC4YgAQYsQMYgwHCAg4QABiABBixAxiDARiKBcICCxAAGIAEGLEDGIMBwgIIEC4YgAQYsQPCAhIQIxiABBgnGIoFGEYY-QEYowXCAgsQLhiABBjRAxjHAcICExAjGIAEGIoFGEYY-QEYjAXYAQHCAgsQABiABBixAxjJA8ICBhAAGBYYHsICCxAAGIAEGIYDGIoFwgIFECEYqwLCAggQABiiBBiJBZgDEvEFRQfkmyCxAoe6BgQIARgTkgcIMi4zNS4yLjOgB4SOArIHCDAuMzUuMi4zuAfzMA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-hp
Brad, I understand your position and the arguments that support it. You have a very large majority of the U.S. in agreement, but I’m not one of them.
This has happened many times since the founding: political or economic interests wishing to use the force of the fed govt to achieve their ends locate in the Constitution a part that deals with the general area of their plans. The Commerce Clause is very commonly used. What happens then is that by redefining or reinterpreting clauses that had plain meaning when written, new and expanded meanings are proposed. The best example is the word ‘regulate’. When the Const. was written, to regulate did not mean general control, it meant to make regular. You regulate a clock so that it tells time accurately. You regulate a double barreled shotgun so that both barrels hit the same point of aim. You did not regulate goods transporters to ensure that the horses or oxen pulling the wagons got at least so many miles per gallon of oats.
And once an area such as regulation of commerce has been legally accepted as Constitutional, the power boys then go back to that last piece of A1S8, saying that Congress is empowered to “make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers.” But the foregoing powers have been redefined and expanded.
That’s how our fed govt has grown: through bastardization of plain language, redefinition of words, and with agreeable Justices who had a piece of the action.
I’ll point out just one more thing. You won’t find any explicit permission in the Constitution for a fed police agency such as the FBI, only for specific areas such as military police and stopping the counterfeiting of money. The “permission” for the FBI comes exclusively through re-interpretation of Constitutional clauses, and always well after adoption.
“Brad, I understand your position and the arguments that support it. You have a very large majority of the U.S. in agreement, but I’m not one of them.”
No you don’t. There’s a few things that will keep me up at night. One of them is a no knock warrant from the FBI at 4:00 in the morning. They try and parade my wife half naked in front of the CNN cameras I’ll end up dead. But I promise you I will take a few of those tactical retards with me. The FBI is going no where. Meaning, deal with it. They’re here to stay. I simply tried to proved you THEIR JUSTIFICATION. It’s spilled milk at this stage. And why I consider conversations like this a waste of time. My opinion, the CIA nor the FBI have never ever served Americans. From day one. Are Kash Patels recent actions a negative or a positive? I’m going with big time positive. I hate the bastards.
You’re right. I apologize for misunderstanding. We’re pretty much on the same page about THEIR JUSTIFICATION.
A building so full of human rats needs to be condemned.
Al
And meanwhile,
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/vicious-soulless-fbi-agents-file-suit-demanding-their/
Fucking pussies. They need their asses beat into the ground. Total pussy losers. Throw these clowns into real combat and watch them piss their pants and die. I’ve watched footage of these clowns. They suck. I’m hoping they get what they deserve.
They behave like outlaws and then demand their identity cannot be disclosed. I’m thinking we must get their identity, how else will we know who the bad guys are? How else will their behavior change if they believe they can terrorize their countrymen and remain anonymous!
joe6pak
I’m wondering where the FBI is finding these morons. It’s certainly not ex mil. Unless they worked in the supply chain. All tough muther fockers until the people that they’ve bullied might get their names. They all had ear to ear grins on their faces as they were parading around Roger Stones half naked wife. They think that’s funny? There’s a bunch of peeps they should meet that enjoy the hell out of good humor.
“I’m wondering where the FBI is finding these morons.”
Law schools.
I’m in 100% agreement with you Brad. 100%.