Texas Redistricting Clears SCOTUS

AP

With conservative justices in the majority, the court acted on an emergency request from Texas for quick action because qualifying in the new districts already has begun, with primary elections in March.

The Supreme Court’s order puts the 2-1 ruling blocking the map on hold at least until after the high court issues a final decision in the case. Justice Samuel Alito had previously temporarily blocked the order while the full court considered the Texas appeal.

The justices cast doubt on the lower-court finding that race played a role in the new map, saying in an unsigned statement that Texas lawmakers had “avowedly partisan goals.” More

3 Comments on Texas Redistricting Clears SCOTUS

  1. Listen to this tortured logic:

    “The new map eliminated five of the state’s nine “coalition” districts, where no minority group has a majority but together they outnumber non-Hispanic white voters. The total number of congressional districts in which minorities make up a majority of voting-age citizens dropped from 16 to 14.

    Yet Republicans argued the map is better for minority voters. There’s a new, eighth Hispanic-majority district, and two Black-majority districts instead of none.

    But critics consider that the Hispanic or Black majority in each district is so slim that white voters, who tend to turn out in larger percentages, will control election results.”

    So, basically, Gerrymandering to ensure that non-whites can outvote whites is good, but Gerrymandering to ensure that white voters who bother to get off their ass and vote can’t get quashed by some white-hating coalition that don’t vote is bad. WTF are these people even talking about?

    1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.