Diogenes’ Middle Finger: Monday, while the media zeroed in on the Sally Yates/James Clapper testimony before Senate Judiciary’s Subcommittee and their own elation over the French election results, quietly the first appeal hearing of the Trump’s blocked travel ban began arguments in the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia. During questioning an ACLU attorney arguing against the ban showed how politicized and a sham our judicial system has become in the hands of democrat appointed judicial activist on the bench following their own version of Blind Justice…….
NTK– ACLU Lawyer Omar Jadwat, arguing against President Trump’s travel ban before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday, admitted that the same exact travel ban “could be” constitutional if it were enacted by Hillary Clinton.
Jadwat argued that Trump’s campaign animus motivated the order, making it illegitimate. This claim was challenged by the Fourth Circuit’s Judge Paul Niemeyer. more
After reading the story there did seem to be a good point in that ACLU lawyers are getting dumber or the good ones are checking out of the this left-wing make work program and getting jobs on Wall Street where they can be really evil.
ACLU – American Communists Liar’s Union
@SCR: Or maybe the ACLU lawyers know they don’t have to try very hard because the fix is in.
They need to start impeaching the political
hack judges.
It’s not like we didn’t know this already, it’s just a surprise that they admitted it. This just shows how completely unhinged the left have become.