Assange Vows a Neutron Bomb Before the 8th – IOTW Report

Assange Vows a Neutron Bomb Before the 8th

Tuesday, 1 November 2016, 11:41 BFH Uncategorized 31

Well, it’s November.

TruthfeedFeaturePageJulian Assange has made it clear that the current Wikileaks cache of hacked emails is so radioactive that they essentially constitute the neutron bomb that will take down the entire Obama Administration.  A neutron bomb does just that—it takes out all life leaving the buildings perfectly intact.

In the present case of the Wikileaks secret weapon, “Phase Three Of Its Election Coverage” promises to complete the job before November 8th.

Wikileaks Warns It Is Launching “Phase Three” Of Its Election Coverage

ht/ js

31 Comments on Assange Vows a Neutron Bomb Before the 8th

  8. I’m ‘tarred’ of waiting on vindication re this criminal cabal which was blatantly obvious from 2007.
    It’s past time for PROSECUTION and reparations–from the gimmes and the real racists. Send all non-Americans back to their respective shitholes.

    Non-Americans are those who never assimilated and never shared our ideals.

  9. He’s waiting to long. Makes me think he’s more interested in destroying or interrupting our political process than hanging our enemies. No matter. I hope he’s got some info that will put them all in front of a firing squad.

  14. @Tony R November 1, 2016 at 11:49 am

    Now that raises an interesting question.

    If Hillary is just indicted before the election, she can still, obviously, be President. There’s no time to actually convict before November 8th. And, I’m not sure what type of conviction would, actually, prevent her from being President, as long as she gets the electoral college votes.

    But what happens if the Democrats push her off the ticket? Even if it’s only to have any hope of “down ticket” votes. Do the pre-election votes putatively for Hillary get trashed? (Just like write-in votes for Pepe.) Or do the Democrats get to count Hillary votes as “whoever we decide to count them for”?

  16. Yeah time is to put out or get out. The stuff that has come out has been good, death of 1000 e-mail papercuts. I understand waiting till the last minute because the lo-info public has a short memory, but a week before is plenty of time even for a good portion of lo-info voters to retain some of this alleged gold you are promising to release.

  17. Regarding a neutron bomb announcement:

    I’ve been saving this for the right time:
    ____________________________________

    This is an email I received from a credible source who has ties with people involved in the national security of our country. I had to get permission to post the contents of the email:
    ____________________________________

    “If you have been like me, this story probably comes closest to the truth about Benghazi. I don’t know what a “smoking gun” looks like, but I think I see some smoke in this brief summary of events. What will it take to unmask this administration and crooked Hillary

    Interesting!!

    As Paul Harvey would have said… “Now we have the rest of the story!!!” Obama and Clinton should be impeached along with Susan Rice et al and put in jail.

    Well it got out, the full truth on what happened in Libya. I believe the supporting documents discussing the missiles. Is what Wikileaks planned to dump this week, but probably knew about the Trump “story” and will wait until Tuesday to capture as much news as possible.

    Here it goes:
    So here’s the REAL story. Ambassador Stevens was sent to the Benghazi post haste in order to retrieve US made Stinger missiles supplied to Ansar al Sharia. Without Congressional oversight or permission. Hillary brokered the deal through Stevens and a private arms dealer named Marc Turi. Then some off the shoulder fired missiles ended up in Afghanistan and were used against our own military. It was July 25th, 2012 when a Chinook helicopter was taken down by one of our own Stingers, but the idiot Taliban didn’t arm the missile and the Chinook didn’t explode, but had to land anyway. An ordnance team recovered the serial number off the missile which led back to a cache of Stingers being kept in Qatar by the CIA.
    Obama and Hillary were now in full panic mode and Stevens was sent in to retrieve the rest of the Stingers. This was a “do-or-die” mission, which explains the stand down orders given to multiple commando teams. It was the State Dept, not the CIA that supplied them to our sworn enemies, because Petraeus wouldn’t supply these deadly weapons due to their potential use on commercial aircraft. Then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus after he refused to testify that he OK’d the BS talking points about a spontaneous uprising due to a YouTube video.
    Obama and Hillary committed treason and THIS is what the investigation is all about, why she had a private server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and why Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was because of a Youtube video, even though everyone knew it was not. Further, the Taliban knew that this administration aided and abetted the enemy. Without Congressional approval. When Boehner created the Select Cmte, and the Taliban began pushing the Obama Administration for the release of 5 Taliban Generals. Bowe Bergdahl was just a pawn everyone KNEW he was a traitor. So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised and a woman that is a serial liar, perjured herself multiple times at the Hearing. Who is now running for POTUS. Only the Dems, with their hands out, palms up, will support her. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called in, because the administration knew our enemies had Stingers.
    Just Google Marc Turi.”
    _______________________________

    Wait until my assertion that Chris Stevens was a piece of shit all along gets proven correct.

  18. TSUNAMI, plausible. Very plausible.

    Whatever that rat bastard has he needs to drop it now.

    I’m convinced that Obama served up Seal team 6 to apologies to the Muslim world for the death of OBL. If Asange has the intel/proof that would lead to treason charges that would almost make the last 8 years worth it.

  19. Assuming that Assange isn’t bluffing (and he hasn’t been, so far), here’s why I think he’s waiting until the last minute for the final bombshell: Assange knows that the public has a very short attention span, and an even shorter memory for the scandals that have come so fast and furious of late. He wants to make sure this news is fresh in the voter’s minds when they go to the polls. Plus, he doesn’t want to give the Clinton campaign a lot of time to spin, obfuscate, and cast doubt on the data, as they have with everything else.

    In other words, methinks there’s method to his madness.

    🙂

  23. @Tsunami
    Ummm, how do I say this as diplomatically as possible, sans lodging arrows in the wrong direction?
    Your email pal with “sources inside national security” is either pulling your leg, or you’re being disingenuous. Given your intelligent writing composition in ordered detail, I would guess it’s the latter.
    I posted the exact same information a few weeks ago on The Benghazi Brief and the Marc Turi article, however, I included links giving credit to the author(s) of each story.
    I won’t relink now, as I’m sure if you ask your friend he/she will want to do the righteous thing and give credit where credit is due. The information is well known in the blogosphere and the author(s) put a tremendous amount of time in researching and developing the story.
    Just thought you’d want to know, as no one wants to be taken for a ride.

    Peace.

  25. BB
    The story as Tsunami presented is right (as far as I know, it’s identical to where I and thousands of others have read it, unless that blog stole it from someone else, whereas that would be plagiarizing, right?) Point being, I assume Tsunami is honorable and would want to give credit to the author of the work. That would be up to him/her to take up with his/her email pal, right?

  26. I got the email from a pal who got it from someone with enduring connections to the Army.

    My source has always been reliable.

    Whether that dubs me as honorable or not makes no difference to me. It’s not my honor or integrity that will destroy this nation if I’m wrong.

    If Wilikeaks exposes something similar to my posting, that also will have no bearing on my honor or integrity.

    All it is is information that I received, asked permission to regurgitate, and received such permission to do so – so I did.

  29. @TSUNAMI: Regarding the comment by “Anonymous” (presumably the Barbie doll gal from the 10/29 Muslim Toy Shop post, remember?), she’s right. Here’s a writeup from a hoax debunking site that has an example of an eRumor which is pretty much verbatim with what your connection sent. So it looks like either the Internet copied it from him (not very likely), or he copied it from the Internet.

    https://www.truthorfiction.com/clinton-sent-ambassador-stevens-benghazi-retrieve-stinger-missiles/

  30. Not questioning YOUR integrity. It appears the friend of your friend claims insider secret knowledge of the story behind Benghazi, and that simply isn’t true. The story has been worked for over a 3 year period and for whatever reason the third-party wishes to claim it as top secret info and has the authority to give permission to repeat it when it’s already public, is….. well you can decide.

    This would be similar to someone copying bfh agitprop without giving him credit and claiming it as their own. No one dies, but it’s morally dishonest.

    Geesh, I didn’t mean to set off WWIII here.

    Dig in – there’s 65 pages of continual updates.

    http://theconservativetreehouse.com/category/benghazi-gate/

Comments are closed.

iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.