ATTENTION MORONS WHO ARE AFRAID TO OFFEND – IF YOU SAY FORD IS “CREDIBLE” THAT MEANS KAVANAUGH DID IT – IOTW Report

ATTENTION MORONS WHO ARE AFRAID TO OFFEND – IF YOU SAY FORD IS “CREDIBLE” THAT MEANS KAVANAUGH DID IT

I am sick of seeing this spineless “train” of  Chivas Regal farts in $900 suits wobble out of the hearing and flap their jowls about how DOCTOR (the doctor that doesn’t know what exculpatory means) Ford is credible.

If she’s credible it means Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her. Is that what you mean to say, that he did it?

There’s nothing wrong with saying “her allegations are not corroborated by anyone. So believing her story requires me to make a leap of faith based on tangibles that don’t belong in the process. Tangibles like, ‘she seems nice, she seems smart, she seems sensitive,’ those things are irrelevant.”

You can’t have it both ways – “she’s credible, but I don’t think Kavanaugh did it.”

Credible means YOU BELIEVE HER.

Stop being so mealy-mouthed and afraid to offend feminazis and beta soy boys.

20 Comments on ATTENTION MORONS WHO ARE AFRAID TO OFFEND – IF YOU SAY FORD IS “CREDIBLE” THAT MEANS KAVANAUGH DID IT

  1. They count on every republican cowed into tippy toeing around being too afraid of their own shadow to say she wasn’t credible, her three witnesses provided sworn statements to the contrary, she contradicted herself, was exposed as working with the dems and she was exposed as a liar – world traveler afraid to fly. And proof they are that afraid is the pathetic questioning we saw today.

    9
  2. Heard a guy say how sensitive the subject matter is when questioning the accuser……..why cant we be sensitive about wrecking the reputation of the accused? Why is it the woman’s feelings and reputation that is more protected?

    20
  3. Didn’t the same people attest to Bill Clinton’s credibility after he said “I did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.”

    Sorry kids. Facts always override performance art.

    16
  4. >>>
    Didn’t the same people attest to Bill Clinton’s credibility after he said “I did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.”
    <<<

    I think the legalese weasel words were: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman".

    In other words, he could later explain that it was a "one time" heat of the moment thing, not any on-going sexual relationship. See, no "sexual relations". Or even if it was proven as sequence of events, it's the the equivalent of a one-night stand thingy for each occurrence. That's what law schools teach their trainees to "double speak", setup traps and escape clauses.

    6
  5. Thanks, Fur – and all of you above! Let me add my rant. To wit: Until some (d) or (rino) actually can personally demonstrate – with actions and evidence, present and historical – that I am wrong, I will assume there is not ONE of them with a “scintilla” of integrity, intelligence, decency, courage and patriotism. NOT ONE!! They do NOT deserve to live here!

    9
  6. This has all been a kangaroo circus for public show. Both Demrats and Repubrats are working against KavaKnow. He would have been confirmed already if they really meant to. How many of the judging Congrats are themselves actually guilty of sexual indiscretions committed far more recently than high school–and the knowledge for which they possibly can be controlled by in their present positions.

    5
  7. How old is this woman? She sounded like a 16 year old, trying to convince her parents that she doesn’t know how she got pregnant. That voice; waffling from faux simpering, faux whining and just as transparent as her story.

    The lie detector felt like she was being held down. The ‘mean ole tech’ stood behind her all the time he asked TWO questions. What a freak show. The dems just digging deeper and deeper.

    4
  8. This is NOT “he said, she said”. She offers only her “basic memory function” to back up her claim, plus three witnesses who could or should have corroborated her account. Instead they all refuted it. So based only on her account and witness list,it’s “four said, she said”.

    If the Senate wants to recover any of its own credibility, it better expel Feinstein.

    5

Comments are closed.