Excellent question that will be completely ignored by liberal muslim lovers.
OT:
I will not click on photo ad links of large breasted women
I will not click on photo ad links of large breasted women…
Must move cursor….
With that same line of reasoning, shouldn’t we be able to shit-can a WH muslim that has failed to do ANYTHING correctly for the majority of Americans since being in office??
Since the vast majority of gun crimes are committed by democRATS, wouldn’t it make more sense to ban democRATS from having guns?
what VietVet said
BFH – check your email. FIFY….
“Common Sense Terror Control”
If you want to operate a mosque you need a Federal Mosque license and you must run a background check on all people who worship there and keep that record available for inspection by the ATF – same as FFL holders
If you want to become a practicing Muslim you must pay a fee and register as one with a FML(Federal Mosque License) holder – same as purchasing a firearm
If you want to buy a Koran you must pass a background check and a record of your purchase will be kept – same as Cali want to do with ammunition purchases
The above is what the overwhelming majority of lawful gun owners are subjected to – What part of “… shall not be infringed” got lost in the mail?
There’s no need to fix anything.
Vast minority is used purposefully here.
Vast minority means few in number but causing a great impact.
If I say tiny I’m saying that I believe that a tiny minority of Muslims’ actions are ban-worthy.
I do not believe that.
And look at what just one negro in the White House did.
@BFH: OK, I guess I’ve not encountered “vast” in conjunction with anything except a majority, so it seemed like an oxymoron to me. (Still kinda does, but I bow to your superior knowledge in these matters).
I would change “vast” to “tiny”, if it were me.
Just sayin’.
🙂
Excellent question that will be completely ignored by liberal muslim lovers.
OT:
I will not click on photo ad links of large breasted women
I will not click on photo ad links of large breasted women…
Must move cursor….
With that same line of reasoning, shouldn’t we be able to shit-can a WH muslim that has failed to do ANYTHING correctly for the majority of Americans since being in office??
Since the vast majority of gun crimes are committed by democRATS, wouldn’t it make more sense to ban democRATS from having guns?
what VietVet said
BFH – check your email. FIFY….
“Common Sense Terror Control”
If you want to operate a mosque you need a Federal Mosque license and you must run a background check on all people who worship there and keep that record available for inspection by the ATF – same as FFL holders
If you want to become a practicing Muslim you must pay a fee and register as one with a FML(Federal Mosque License) holder – same as purchasing a firearm
If you want to buy a Koran you must pass a background check and a record of your purchase will be kept – same as Cali want to do with ammunition purchases
The above is what the overwhelming majority of lawful gun owners are subjected to – What part of “… shall not be infringed” got lost in the mail?
There’s no need to fix anything.
Vast minority is used purposefully here.
Vast minority means few in number but causing a great impact.
If I say tiny I’m saying that I believe that a tiny minority of Muslims’ actions are ban-worthy.
I do not believe that.
And look at what just one negro in the White House did.
@BFH: OK, I guess I’ve not encountered “vast” in conjunction with anything except a majority, so it seemed like an oxymoron to me. (Still kinda does, but I bow to your superior knowledge in these matters).
🙂
my bwain get owie…..