Biden’s Doctor Refuses to Testify on Joe Biden’s Health Decline, Pleads the 5th – Comer Responds

Gateway Pundit-


Joe Biden’s physician Dr. O’Connor refused to testify before the Oversight Committee and pleaded the 5th Amendment.

House Oversight Chairman James Comer subpoenaed Dr. O’Connor to testify on Joe Biden’s health decline.

Dr. O’Connor initially stalled and on Wednesday he showed up to the Rayburn House Office, asserted doctor-patient privilege and pleaded the 5th Amendment. more here

13 Comments on Biden’s Doctor Refuses to Testify on Joe Biden’s Health Decline, Pleads the 5th – Comer Responds

  1. Treat this asshole the same way Joe Shmoe would be treated. Lock him up, preferably at Alligator Alcatraz. After a few days there, he will gladly spill his guts about everything he knows and implicate others in the process.

    8
  2. The good doctor is nothing but a convenient scapegoat. We all knew what was going on with Joe Biden whether one wishes to admit it or not. There was a reason Biden didn’t campaign in 2020, and it wasn’t Covid. He didn’t do press conferences except for those very carefully scripted for him, didn’t take questions, stumbled through his speeches and lost his train of thought, and foreign leaders basically ignored him. Jill Biden acted as the President, and we wondered (and are still wondering) who called the shots during Biden’s presidency.

    Dr. O’Connor was doing what he was told to do, and there is basically nothing he can say at this point which would surprise me. For the Democrats and the MSM to point at this man and claim “see, he didn’t let us know what was going on” is hypocrital at best and more likely just naked lies.

    9
  3. I despise this doctor but I have to say that I do have a little bit of sympathy for weak people who have put themselves into like situation. O’Connor’s error was to accept the prestigious (for some) position as presidential physician without knowing or caring about what it would cost him. In his case and in present circumstances, his cost was a requirement that he lie repeatedly, with failure to do so entailing personal and professional ruin.

    I don’t think he’s invoking the 5th to cover past crimes, but instead the future crime of perjury if he continues his lies under oath at deposition. His only other path is to tell the truth, avoiding perjury charges, but then suffering that pesky personal and professional ruin thing.

    He’s a weak and flawed man, and I have no personal sympathy for him whatsoever. I hope he gets what he deserves.

    6
  4. If I could edit the above comment, that first sentence would end,

    …I do have a little bit of sympathy for weak half-wits who have unknowingly put themselves into like situation.

    2
  5. “…at this point what difference does it make.”
    It’s the core of the legal process. You gotta start pealing away the layers of the onion to expose the rot inside.
    If enough is exposed they can remove any legislation he (auto) signed into law.

    2

Comments are closed.