Update:
Many are asking if the people in the court docket are actually Christine Ford’s parents. This wedding announcement clears up any questions. (HT to Heavy.com) Her parents were the defendants.
Additionally, many are saying that the court case ended favorably for the Blaseys, so reprisal would seem inconsistent with the outcome.
The outcome is irrelevant. Plaintiffs or defendants prevail in cases where they hated the judge and felt abused or mistreated during the process. We have no way of knowing how the Blaseys felt about the Kavanaughs. It’s just a curious connection that cannot be ignored, particularly when a victim’s motivation for derailing a SCOTUS pick at this juncture is what’s being played out in the court of public opinion.
~~~~~~~~~
This is the work of and with the hat tip going to Hot Salsa.
This is an interesting tidbit. It could mean absolutely nothing, and certainly isn’t proof of reprisal, but I don’t think it should be dismissed out-of-hand. Is it simply a coincidence?
This Ford lady is most likely a hard lefty. She most likely abhors Kavanaugh’s politics. Maybe it didn’t take much to get her to participate in a smear campaign.
Case Search
Court System: |
Circuit Court for Montgomery County – Civil System |
Case Number: |
156006V Sub Type:FORECLOSURE |
Date Filed: |
08/08/1996 |
Case Status: |
CLOSED |
(Each Alias, Address, and Attorney for the Plaintiff is displayed)
Name: |
UMLIC-EIGHT CORP A NORTH CAROLINA CORP |
Address: |
7415 PINEVILLE MATTHEWS 1010 |
|
CHARLOTTE NC 28200 |
Attorney(s) for the Plaintiff
|
Address: |
PEABODY & BROWN |
|
1255 23RD STREET N.W. #800 |
|
WASHINGTON DC 20037 |
(Each Alias, Address, and Attorney for the Defendant is displayed)
Address: |
17 MASTERS COURT |
|
POTOMAC MD 20854 |
Address: |
17 MASTERS COURT |
|
POTOMAC MD 20854 |
Issue: |
FORECLOSURE |
Issue: |
SALE OF REAL PROPERTY |
Docket Date: |
08/08/1996Docket Number: 1 |
Docket Description: |
PETITION |
Docket Type: |
Docket Filed By:Plaintiff |
Docket Text: |
PETITIONER’S PETITION TO FORECLOSE AND FOR SALE OF PROPERTY, EXHIBITS A1-6 & B, STATEMENT OF MORTGAGE DEBT, AND CERTIFIED COPY OF ASSIGNMENT (EXHIBIT B) FILED. |
Docket Date: |
08/08/1996Docket Number: 2 |
Docket Description: |
MILITARY AFFIDAVIT |
Docket Type: |
Docket |
Docket Text: |
MILITARY AFFIDAVIT, FILED. |
Docket Date: |
08/08/1996Docket Number: 3 |
Docket Description: |
|
Docket Type: |
Motion Filed By:Plaintiff Status:Open |
Docket Text: |
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FILING A NOMINAL BOND FILED. |
Docket Date: |
08/09/1996Docket Number: 4 |
Docket Description: |
|
Docket Type: |
Docket Filed By:Plaintiff |
Docket Text: |
MEMORANDUM SENT GIVING NOTICE OF NEW CASE NUMBER FILED. |
Docket Date: |
08/13/1996Docket Number: 5 |
Docket Description: |
ORDER OF COURT |
Docket Type: |
Docket |
Ruling Judge: |
MASON, MICHAEL D |
Docket Text: |
ORDER OF COURT (MASON, J./RICE, M.) GRANTING PETION FOR SALE OF PROPERTY; THAT HARRY J. KELLY IS HEREBY APPOINTED TRUSTEE TO MAKE THE SALE, TRUSTEE SHALL FILE A BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF ($5,000.00) AND CONTINUE WITH THE TERMS OF THE SALE FILED. (COPIES MAILED) |
Docket Date: |
09/19/1996Docket Number: 6 |
Docket Description: |
|
Docket Type: |
Docket |
Docket Text: |
REVISED STATEMENT OF MORTGAGE DEBT FILED. |
Docket Date: |
09/19/1996Docket Number: 7 |
Docket Description: |
|
Docket Type: |
Docket Filed By:Plaintiff |
Docket Text: |
RICHARD M. PRICE, ATTORNEY’S CERTIFICATION AS TO RULE 1-31- FOR ADMITTANCE TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE STATE OF MARYLAND FILED. |
Docket Date: |
09/24/1996Docket Number: 8 |
Docket Description: |
BOND & APPROVAL IN THE AMOUNT OF |
Docket Type: |
Docket Filed By:Plaintiff |
Docket Text: |
BOND AND APPROVAL IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000.00 FILED. |
Docket Date: |
01/27/1997Docket Number: 9 |
Docket Description: |
MOTION, DISMISS |
Docket Type: |
Motion Filed By:Plaintiff Status:Granted |
Ruling Judge: |
KAVANAUGH, MARTHA G |
Reference Docket(s): |
Ruling: 10 |
Docket Text: |
PLAINTIFF’S VOLUNTARY MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR RETURN OF BOND FILED. |
Docket Date: |
02/04/1997Docket Number: 10 |
Docket Description: |
|
Docket Type: |
Ruling Status:Granted |
Ruling Judge: |
KAVANAUGH, MARTHA G |
Reference Docket(s): |
Motion: 9 |
Docket Text: |
ORDER OF COURT (KAVANAUGH, J./RICE, M.) THAT THE VOLUNTARY MOTION TO DISMISS IS HEREBY GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE AND THAT THE BOND FILED BY HARRY J. KELLY AS TRUSTEE SHALL BE RELEASED AND RETURNED FILED. (COPIES MAILED ( |
Docket Date: |
02/04/1997Docket Number: 11 |
Docket Description: |
SUBSTITUTE COPY FOR ORIGINAL |
Docket Type: |
Docket |
Docket Text: |
COPY OF TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUST/BOND NO. B126904-BLASEY AND POWER OF ATTORNEY, FIXED IN LIEU OF ORIGINAL FILED. |
Docket Date: |
02/04/1997Docket Number: 12 |
Docket Description: |
ORIGINAL DEED OF TRUST & NOTE MAILED |
Docket Type: |
Docket |
Docket Text: |
ORIGNIAL TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUST/BOND NO. B126904, WITHDRAWN AND MAILED BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED FROM RICHARD M. PRICE FILED. |
Docket Date: |
03/03/1997Docket Number: 13 |
Docket Description: |
RETURN RECEIPT |
Docket Type: |
Docket |
Docket Text: |
RETURN RECEIPT FILED. |
Well no shit. Libs are so petty.
There are no coincidences.
Leftists, especially feminazis don’t need any additional inducements to frame an innocent man whose politics they disagree with. The end justifies the means. ANY means. There are no rules with these people.
The dems have gone from Impeach 45 to Impeach 35…years ago.
Things that make you go, “Hmmm…?” 🤔
So when Trump nominates a woman to replace Ruth Bader Hawking-what will the Left trot out to smear her with?
-still shaves her legs and underarms! Shame!!
-loves her husband OMG!
-voted for Reagan NO!
-roadside litter video discovered from 1987 HATES the PLANET!!
It’s endless.
If this situation gets any more drama, I’m gonna need some Dramamine.
TO illustr8r
SIMPLE:
1) she’s not an “authentic” woman
2) she “KILLS WOMEN!” because she against them killing babies
Big Slurpy, break out the dramamine.
“Her brother Ralph III worked for Baker Hostetler for 15 years. Baker Hostetler was/is Fusion GPS’ law firm. She’s affiliated with “Indivisible” in Silicon Valley. Pre-scrubbed her FB and LinkedIn, then lawyered up with a lefty DC feminist lawyer before flipping the switch.”
https://twitter.com/JolieVieille/status/1041568593677361152
@Czar of Defenestration September 17, 2018 at 4:33 am
How do you think Trump will explain his unconstitutional attempt to remove a Supreme Court Justice, on the unprecedented excuse that she’s dead?
This would be more than enough conflict of interest to recuse 100 Jeff Sessions.
Just curious – but seeing as her parents kept their house as a result of this, where is the motive?
This woman needs help! Will someone please put her in a white jacket and get her to the hospital. Poor deranged thing.
TO Anon
What on earth are you talking about? Do you not understand humor (using the Left’s own “argumments” to laugh at them)?!
This Ford lady is most likely a hard lefty?
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/09/professor_accusing_kavanaugh_is_radical_sjw_with_some_damning_student_reviews.html
There is little question of this. According to this article she’s a crazy SJW. Time to put the microscope on Palo Alto University and examine why they still employ a “perfesser” in clinical psychology who uses her trade to wield the power of grades over kids!
Shameful!
And of course it wasn’t the fault of her parents for not paying the mortgage or selling the house before they lost it.
This is obviously nothing new with the libidiots. This belief of no personal responsibility. It’s all the rich white people’s fault if anything in life doesn’t work out.
She never grew up eh?
Grassley is purportedly awaiting RNC oppo research. If the dems are confidant their Anita Hill can pull this off and demand a halt in confirm (McCain sends kisses from hell, Flake), bring it on. Be careful what you ask for Ms Ford, the Sixth Amendment shall be your public humiliation.
Dirty Democrat Leftist Lying Bitch
Christine Ford is the new Anita Hill. Disgusting.
The 6th Amendment provides for the accused to publicly confront their accuser in a court or in this case before the Judiciary committee and bring up all the information to determine the truth of the matter. This needs to be done ASAP to insure the Truth comes out before the confirmation hearing.,We don’t need another Bork style character assassination by the Democrats.
Typo or two different judges named Kavanaugh?
This topic has been linked on Zero Hedge, farther down the comment string by NoPension in the comment from Linda Hand. Might seem overkill to be so specific, but with all the comments on ZH, wanted to describe where it is, and also give credit to the commenter.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-17/she-must-be-heard-republicans-join-fight-delay-kavanaugh-confirmation-vote
Grog- Oh dear, looks kinda bad for her. And maybe even her brother. Interesting. Thanks.
https://mobile.twitter.com/WiredSources/status/1041674476935630849
I hope they do tell her to testify. I don’t know why the Dems haven’t officially invited her to do so, yet. What’s up with that?
She already stated she didn’t know where, whose, party it was, how she got to the party, how she got home, etc., changed several details within days. She’s a hot mess!
I was watching an interview with Justice Thomas, toward the end they asked about the Kav kerfuffle.
He said all that’s left is the pubic hair on the coke can.
Another “high-tech lynching”.
She had an ax to grind..the truth will come out..the ties to fusion..and her parents dilemma and wants revenge…she is a fraud…JEALOUS…she and hubby want big money..SOROS MONEY
The article claims “Her parents were the plaintiffs.” That is wrong. The court documents very clearly state that her parents were the defendants. Case closed.
Yes, Mike.
You are correct. I knew this and still wrote it wrong.
The point is, though, you can’t make a judgement about how the Blaseys felt about the judge by just reading the docket.
Even if the case went favorably for them they could still hate the judge.
So the people saying this is much ado about nothing are wrong, in my opinion.
There still could be reprisal on their part no matter how the case went.
The Parents didn’t get to keep the house they sold it
Docket Text: ORDER OF COURT (MASON, J./RICE, M.) GRANTING PETION FOR SALE OF PROPERTY; THAT HARRY J. KELLY IS HEREBY APPOINTED TRUSTEE TO MAKE THE SALE, TRUSTEE SHALL FILE A BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF ($5,000.00) AND CONTINUE WITH THE TERMS OF THE SALE FILED. (COPIES MAILED)
I’m sure that after she is coached some more, the democrats will get the details cleared up and straightened up and about for her. So she suddenly remembers where the party took place, when it occurred and how she got to and from the party and how many joints she smoked. Along with the people, who are long dead and gone, that may have been there. They know the best answers to dream up in cases like this. Just give them some more time.
@Beachmom
do you not know how to read or are you just stupid.
@ everybody else
What a bunch of idiots. Let me see I got a speeding ticket and when I went to court the judge dismissed the case. I was so angry at the judge I swore I would get even if it was the last thing I ever did.
Only a Repubtard would have this logic