Conducting an Anonymous Poll – IOTW Report

Conducting an Anonymous Poll

Sunday, 13 June 2021, 20:12 BFH Uncategorized 59

Do you view QAnon’s narratives favorably or unfavorably?

Thumb up your answer in the comments.

59 Comments on Conducting an Anonymous Poll

  6. I will say that QAnon probably woke – the right awakening – a lot of people up to the deep state and it’s totalitarian agenda, thus served a good purpose. But when prediction after prediction after trust the plan, never came to pass, it became evident that it was a scam.

    18

  7. I see a lot of Deep State Democrats doing illegal stuff and never being held accountable…Q at least drew peoples attention to the Crimes

    BIG Thumbs Up

    21

  11. most too obscure, too vague, and too cryptic to assign either of the two choices you present, so how about “neither” as an option? Since this is an anonymous poll, i am not lurker!

    11

  19. Unfavorably. Who blindly follows an anonymous source? If it is the CIA/FBI I wouldn’t be surprised particularly given their narratives along with having any followers look like complete loons.

    3

  21. @Anonymous June 13, 2021 at 8:48 pm –
    “…Who blindly follows an anonymous source?…”

    I hope your tongue was firmly planted in your cheek when you posted that comment.

    11

  23. Anonymous JUNE 13, 2021 AT 8:48 PM

    Unfavorably. Who blindly follows an anonymous source? If it is the CIA/FBI I wouldn’t be surprised particularly given their narratives along with having any followers look like complete loons.

    Said the anonymous guy.

    16

  25. It was an obvious psy-op campaign against conservatives from the very beginning. It promoted way too many dead-end rabbit trails obviously going nowhere. It gave very false hope to conservatives, lulled them into a false sense of security that somehow Trump had all of this in hand which led to great deal of inaction by conservatives (who are famous for letting other people do the heavy lifting). Then after the trap was sprung (i.e. Trump had the election stolen from him), conservatives were caught flat footed and pantsed and essentially in a paralytic type of shock. There were unintended consequences to the CIA created Q in that it did create a political awakening of sorts but tis awakening was utterly off-set by the conservative political inertia that Q was actually created to cause. And the operation was so successful that the left started to be frightened by the monster they created. Conservs are just as much of a group of sheep as the left and maybe even more so, the left at least can hold the party-line and the left utterly punishes anyone who breaks ranks, not conservs though, not conservs.

    5

  26. @Anonymous June 13, 2021 at 9:12 pm

    As a matter of principle I don’t TU “Anonymous” comments, but yours was good.

    Why do you post anonymously? Fur can figure out who you are if he wants to, while the rest of us don’t have a clue. Give yourself an identity. It helps to differentiate yourself from the other Anons, and makes you more a member of the community – unless of course you prefer to hover on the perimeter.

    It especially gives you more credibility when you post negative comments about QAnon.

    9

  27. Deep state mole intended to make Trump supporters look like conspiracy nuts. A bunch of crap with just enough real information to be taken serious by just enough people.

    5

  31. Unfavor. Thumbs down like gladiator style…..

    Last I heard it was just 2 guys making stuff
    up for a laugh.If it was real they would get
    some bad case of Arkancide.

    3

  33. out of the thousands & thousands of websites I’ve visited in my life, very few I have rated ‘favorable’. most are garbage that just post clickbait gimmicks that drives in revenue. I consider QAnon in this category.
    been on that site more than once. it is not ‘deep web’ anything. it’s just throwing out vague ‘promises’ of ‘more to come’ … like I said, clickbait. (btw, if you think you got in the deep web by simply clicking a url jump … you ain’t in the deep web)

    QAnon isn’t even decent Nostradamus crap … & I can understand the Book of Revelations better than Nostradamus.
    Hell, the ‘Paul is Dead’ narrative was better conceived (by a late night college radio station) & a whole lot more believable … & a whole lot more entertaining than the QAnon drivel

    … as Mulder said, “I want to believe …”

    … guess you can put me in the ‘unfavorable’ category

  34. I have no clue. I have read about him/she/zee/zhem/it/its/it’s/Ms here at IOTW… but, yeah, I have to do shit like cut the grass and plant flowers.

    3

  35. @BFH – “…We’re nowhere near that number…”

    What does that say? Quite frankly, I would have thought that the number of iOTW’ers who viewed QAnon favorably would be closer to the 4%.

    1

  36. We need the truth factor on our side, because if we don’t have the facts backed up, then we are accused of conspiracy theories even on our own side (Rinos)

    Fuels the Commies to make up lies and then the media runs with it. 🤨

    I like to go to sites like BitChute but they can also be out there, just like to see other viewpoints.

  37. Honestly, I never even HEARD of QANON until the leftists started yammering on and on about it. I don’t know that I have ever even come across one of their “theories” except in news stories about leftists whining or warning that their “dis-information” will be the end of life on this and every other planet in the known universe.

    1

  38. I already have heavy-duty tinfoil hats. I don’t need any more.

    I go to Breitbart about 5 or 6 times a year, and that’s enough.

    IOTW is where I go 363 days a year (sometimes my internet doesn’t work).

    7

  39. BigFurHat…. I seriously doubt that article, before I was booted from Twitter I had 66K followers and I follwed even more to see what was going on, thousands of Twitter handles had Q worked into in their title, unless they were all bots which is unlikely.

  41. I looked into it just enough to realize that it was either a scam or a joke — which only takes about 10 minutes, tops — and decided that it was not something worth following.

    5

  42. It was kinda interesting when I first discovered it. I followed one guy on Twitter for awhile and read his Q interpretations. Nothing ever came true though, time after time after time and the whole “trust the plan” was just hope porn. I quit paying attention. The closer to the election it got the more crazy cult Q sages popped up in my Twitter feed. Just weird. Nope, done and done.

    5

  47. One of the latest “Deep Throat” things (whatever you call it) is X-22. I have a friend and an acquaintance who never miss a daily podcast. It’s like listening to the nonsense on Coast-to-Coast radio.

    I’ve spent the past couple years focused on improving/deepening my relationship with the only higher authority that matters to me: God. I’ve paid attention to POTUS Trump and politics, too, but I’ve been holding them much more lightly than before.

    QAnon seemed like a huge distraction, at best.

    5

  56. If I KNEW what the F#@& they WERE, I MIGHT have an opinion on it!

    ANY answer other than “John de Lancie” (LOOK it up!) has NEVER made any sense to me.

    “FIGHT CLUB” is better understood than “Q.” 🙄

  59. Not favorable or unfavorably.
    I listen to, read everything, and make up my mind if enough evidence exist to support the claim.
    They get the same benefit of doubt from me everyone else gets.

Comments are closed.

iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.