De Blasio: Being A Sanctuary City Means Less Terrorism – IOTW Report

De Blasio: Being A Sanctuary City Means Less Terrorism

Is he high?

DC: New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said Monday that New Yorkers will be at risk of terror if Attorney General Jeff Sessions follows through on cutting federal law enforcement grants to sanctuary cities.

Sessions appeared at the White House to say that jurisdictions that ignore immigration detainers will lose Department of Justice grants, which total $4.1 billion for the upcoming fiscal year.

“President Trump’s latest threat changes nothing. We will remain a city welcoming of immigrants who have helped make our city the safest big city in the nation,” de Blasio said in response. “Any attempt to cut NYPD funding for the nation’s top terror target will be aggressively fought in court. We won’t back down from protecting New Yorkers from terror – or from an overzealous administration fixated on xenophobia and needless division.”

The attorney general, on the other hand, argued that sanctuary cities make America more dangerous.

more

26 Comments on De Blasio: Being A Sanctuary City Means Less Terrorism

  1. De Blasio is simply taking the long view. When terrorists in a sanctuary city have first killed all the infidels, and subsequently killed each other in sectarian wars, the sanctuary city will be empty of living residents. See? No more terrorism.

  2. Somehow the message from the White House was lost in translation. The message was about illegal aliens.

    The sanctuary cities hit back: Our immigrants who make our city diverse and wonderful and blah blah blah.

    No one said a thing about immigrants. Gholly what the FRIG is wrong with these pricks. HOW?

  3. This cuck Deblabio thinks appeasement works with Muslims. It doesn’t, it encourages them to pound on you harder because it means you are a weak cuck.

    Once they know you are a weak cuck they will treat you like a weak cuck and screw your wife, your daughter, shoot your dog and crap on your floor and Deblabio will just bow his head and apologize for not having any goats for them to screw too.

  4. the monies are a grant not an entitlement. Therefore they can be withheld for non conforming issues. And de blabio just shut up and go away.
    almost anyone could do a better job than you. The crap I’ve heard coming out of your mouth makes me realize that you don’t have a clue to the realities of life in present day America.

  5. Being a sanctuary city means less terrorism simply because they will call it something else like “workplace violence” or “triggering” thus obfuscating reality like liberals always do.

  6. Tucker last night had some little prick who was pro-sanctuary-city. Tucker, as usual skewered him. As soon as he said “sanctuary cities are safer”, Tucker pounced: “there are absolutely no studies that prove that, none”. Stuttering by the dumb-dumb followed.

  7. O.k., sanctuary cities are safer, so this means snctuary cities don’t need as much money for law enforcement, so cutting federal funding to sanctuary cities will have no effect on the safety of sanctuary cities, which will continue to become safer and safer as more illegal immigrants flow in. Seems to be a win-win for everyone under deBlasio’s analysis.

  8. Uh, yeah, right. And more blacks means less gangs? More blacks leads to less welfare? If DeBlasio really believes what he’s saying, perhaps he’d like to take a few more boat loads of violent, illiterate, untrainable middle eastern terrorists?

Comments are closed.