Democrats’ pandemic attacks ignore Trump’s 100-plus executive actions – IOTW Report

Democrats’ pandemic attacks ignore Trump’s 100-plus executive actions

JUST THE NEWS: Trump early on banned travel from China, a move Biden later endorsed, used dozens of executive orders to fight COVID-19, and is fast-tracking vaccine development.

Democrats have used their presidential nominating convention to forcefully attack President Trump’s leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet their narrative has left out the White House’s long list of actions against the coronavirus.

Just the News compiled a detailed list of more than 100 significant executive actions taken by the Trump administration to fight the virus since it spread from Wuhan, China, earlier this year. They range from fast-tracking a vaccine through public-private partnerships to sealing the border early on from infected locations.

And last week the White House released a report documenting 78 times the Trump administration used the Defense Production Act since March to fight COVID-19.

Yet Michelle Obama said Monday night that “More than 150,000 people have died, and our economy is in shambles because of a virus that this president downplayed for too long.”

The former first lady offered no evidence that Trump downplayed the threat of the coronavirus and also failed to mention that Trump early on banned travel from China, a move that Democratic nominee Joe Biden (who at first called the ban “xenophobic”) later endorsed. MORE

6 Comments on Democrats’ pandemic attacks ignore Trump’s 100-plus executive actions

  1. Create a 30 sec ad with Mrs. Moose proclaiming he acted too late and underneath her scrolling all the acts he did along with the date. At the bottom note that Trump acted in advance of most other western countries or all if that’s the case) and maybe for fun note he acted on the advice of experts appointed by Obama.

    2
  2. You wanna pway wuff, Demented crats? Hokay.

    Who was it that put brakes on the use of HCQ, allowing it to be used only after the virus had spread to critical organs or had triggered the dangerous immune overreaction when it would do little good?

    Who has cited as valid utter bullshit trials where HCQ was obviously administered in a way to guarantee a bad result?

    Who touted a negative study by Lancet, and then didn’t check out the ridiculous methodology used by the researchers

    Who is right now suppressing testimony by front line doctors who say the HCQ is a magic bullet when it is used as the science says it should be used.

    Who is it that said HCQ is too hazardous when it is no more hazardous than most OTC drugs

    It sure aint the man who, 6 months ago, said that HCQ was a gamechanger

    1

Comments are closed.