Dimwitted Homosexual Thinks He’s Made a Point – IOTW Report

Dimwitted Homosexual Thinks He’s Made a Point

Picture 3Video

See this moron above? You can be fully in support of homosexual marriage and still be honest with yourself and admit that his stunt made little sense.

Memories Pizza said that they wouldn’t cater a gay wedding if asked to do so. So this choad (pictured above) went there and bought two pizzas and served them at his homosexual wedding. He thinks he’s somehow made a point.

This is NOT catering a wedding. It is NOT participating in your homosexual wedding.

The guy says he’s an LGBT comedian. Suppose I asked him to do stand-up at a GOP event and he adamantly refused. If I got a tape of his act and played it at the event, did he participate in the event? No. Just like getting a pizza to go and eating it at the wedding is not “participating at the wedding.”

If I bought flowers at his husband’s florist (2 to 1 he has a florist) and set them up at a pro-life event, did his husband (I can barely type that phrase) participate at the event?

Well, according to the choad, he did.

Thanks homosexual man!

 

35 Comments on Dimwitted Homosexual Thinks He’s Made a Point

  1. So this homosexual goofball spends 4+ hours driving and buys 2 pizzas at full price from a place he says won’t cater a “gay wedding”. But Memories Pizza willingly sold a homosexual 2 takeout pizzas even though they didn’t know or care that the idiot was a homosexual or that he would serve them at his “wedding”. Now he’s celebrating “tricking” them into “catering” his “wedding” as some sort of supposed victory for “gay rights”, even though all he actually did was buy a couple of carryout pizzas.

    Look at me, look at me…… I tricked Little Caesar’s into “catering” my dinner last night after they told me they don’t do catering for old, fat, white, heterosexual guys that happily eat alone (the intolerant bigots said that buying their $5 carry out special wouldn’t actually constitute “catering”)! Boy did I pull a fast one on them! I should make a video and post it to youtube.

    Please explain to me once again why we are supposed to believe that these people have sane, rational thought processes and are not rightly considered to be mentally ill.

  2. The best part is @ 2:10 when the side bar say’s he is gonna act “straight and confident”. Then he orders very meekly and quickly, “Hi, ummm… Can I have two large pizzas for carry-out”.

    Not exactly the best John Wayne impression. And not exactly an order I would consider a catering.

    The only thing that would have made it better would be if the lady yelled to the back, “I need two large plains for the fag!”.

  3. Obama is passed out in a bathtub of vodka with half his face missing and has indicated, thru a pulping state, to no longer carry out his remaining service as POTUS. Guys, all it took was a life-size piece of cardboard, some magic markers, and a pair of scissors to make it happen.

  4. This is why I don’t go to fag weddings. When my wife and I got married, everyone got ribeyes on china with actual silverware. In fact, I don’t even recall having to accommodate a single vagitarian.

    Go to a fag wedding and you eat cold pizza off a paper plate, you’ll probably have to pour your drink from a 2 liter bottle as well.

  5. Wife and I had a diGiorno the other evening – does that mean that diGiorno caters heterosexual pizza nights?

    The guy’s a faggot and probably gonna die of some disgusting painful faggot disease – so I guess he’s (its?) gotta get his (its?) victories wherever he (it?) can.

  6. If a gay vegan male swallows, is he still a vegan?
    We already know he is no longer a man.
    Changing a lightbulb doesn’t make you an electrician, fixing a dripping faucet doesn’t make you a plumber, buying take out pizza for your wedding doesn’t make the pizzeria a caterer, willingly suck one dick, queer forever.

  7. I advocate for a civil license contract for all couples wanting the benefit of legal protections under the law. If a gay, or whatever couple, is certainly entitled to a “wedding” in a church of “what’s happening now” which accepts gay marriages. We are a nation that should be tolerant of other religious faiths, as long as folks of faith accept U.S. laws and the constitution.

    Unless the gay couple’s minister, rabbi, imam, etc. is ordained by a religious institution (or the equivalent), what the couple has is a ceremony to celebrate their civil union. It was not marriage in the traditional sense. A “rent a preach” with a license to conduct a ceremony is simply not a “marriage.”

    Government needs to get out of the marriage business and conduct only civil union ceremonies. The mainline churches, synagogues, etc. , in order to try and stave off government intrusions, should agree to perform marriage ceremonies only to members of the congregation who are in good standing. For Christians, marriage is holy sacrament in the eyes of God.

    A liberal, progressive friend of mine, insisted, (she’s an atheist for goodness sake) on a “wedding” ceremony conducted by a gay “rent a preach.” She insists that the ceremony provided a marriage. She is apparently oblivious to the fact that marriage is a holy sacrament. Gee, these liberal progressive are ignorant of the history and context of the marriage argument. I’m just waiting until a mosque is sued for not conducting a marriage. Should be interesting. just hope no genital mutilations occur.

  8. Government needs to get out of even the “civil union” business.
    Let two Leftist Libtards “shack up” and live together, no license or ceremony needed. It’s not like Leftist Libtards believe in any organized religion, so why force a church to perform a ceremony that is meaningless to them anyway? To a LL, the state is their religion.
    Simplify the tax code so that it doesn’t matter how many people are together, that’s usually why the state insists on having people register their marriages, for tax purposes.
    Birth certificates? Records kept at the hospital. “Mother”. Father”. Just for inherited genetic health problems. ‘Nuff said.
    Inheritances, insurances, etc. None of the state’s business. Or anyone else’s. And it’s not mattering, as far as I can see, where any REAL discrimination is being done by any business issuing these things, so, again, why is it any of the state’s business to register any of the above?

    Sorry for the disjointed rant. Some points not as well thought out or expressed as I would wish. So much going on at work today.

Comments are closed.