White people are open game. White people have no “special” protection under the law, which makes our legal system markedly unfair.
A Calgary indiginous woman who knocked out a white woman’s tooth on November 1 while yelling “I hate white people” did not commit a hate crime, according to provincial court Judge Harry Van Harten.
The victim, Lydia White, was standing outside a Calgary pub talking to another person whne Crowchief walked up and yelled “I hate white people,” before punching White in the face – knocking out a tooth. Upon her arrest, Crowchief told police “the white man was out to get her,” according to the Calgary Herald.
Yet Judge Van Harten didn’t see any racial motivation whatsoever…
Provincial court Judge Harry Van Harten, in a written decision, said Tamara Crowchief’s motivation for striking Lydia White was not related to racial bias.
Crown prosecutor Karuna Ramakrishnan, who had sought a sentence of 12 to 15 months, argued Crowchief’s unprovoked attack last Nov. 1, amounted to a hate crime.
But Van Harten agreed with defence counsel Adriano Iovinelli that there was insufficient evidence to establish Crowchief attacked White because of the colour of her skin.
“There is no evidence either way about what the offender meant or whether . . . she holds or promotes an ideology which would explain why this assault was aimed at this victim,” said Van Harten during his ruling. “I am not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that this offense was, even in part, motivated by racial bias.”
At a court hearing earlier this year, White said she’s still confused by the assault.
“I still get angry when I think about it,” she said. “I don’t understand why this woman did this. I never did anything to her. Never even spoke to her.”
ht/ js
Time for us not to be white anymore. Open to suggestions, if anyone has ideas.
Not a hate crime? Even though they have him cold?!?!
They don’t call it “The Great White North” for nothing!
I’m white, but the AR-15 I defend myself with is black. Does that count?
Found this in the comment section. Interesting:
StackShinyStuff Fri, 08/03/2018 – 13:21 Permalink
This is the problem with all these retarded laws. They will only be used to go after the approved people.
It’s okay, because as history shows, once whites get pushed past a certain point, nobody kills with greater efficiency.
Someone once said, in the next war you won’t be able to take off your uniform. I think we edge closer each passing day.
***This person may be on to something.
@meyou – suggest you contact Shaun King or Rachel Dolezal for pointers.
@neyou – How’d you like to be Peach? #FFE5B4
actually … there is no such thing as a ‘hate crime’ … you do wrong against someone, you suffer the consequences under the law, derived from the Constitution & local laws
today’s problems originate because of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, when the US decided that ‘equal protection’ was more equal to some, rather than others … since then it has been legal to declare one ‘group’ better protected than others … ‘Precedent’!
@Hambone: I guess that makes you biracial!
Oh Canaduh!… The judge is a total SJW cunt, a total disgrace. .
Gives new meaning to “Polar Bear Hunting”.
Time for the Polar Bears to hunt back.
And the great divide continues, perpetuated by the ignorant liberals that refuse to accept their loss at the ballot box.
Deplorable B Woodman, wins the internet.
Citizens have no rights in European countries, when you get right down to it. Canada is a European country.
Fuckin’ Canada again?. *sigh*
Remember when Eskimos used to kiss by rubbing noses? Good times. Good times
If we do have a civil war and conservatives win (we will), the “hate laws” will have to go. They are challenges to free speech, and unconstitutional.
@Tim Buktu August 4, 2018 at 11:29 am
Timmeh! If you’re fighting in support of the boxcar that brought you here, you’ve already lost.