Evidence Suggests BioNTech and Pfizer Falsified Key Data: Part 1 – IOTW Report

Evidence Suggests BioNTech and Pfizer Falsified Key Data: Part 1

Trial Site News:
Evidence has emerged casting serious doubt over the authenticity of tests carried out by BioNTech (Marketing Authorisation Holder) and Pfizer to prove the fidelity of their product by demonstrating that only the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is expressed in cells by the nucleoside-modified mRNA Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine (BNT162b2).

Several Western Blot tests were conducted to evaluate the protein expression of the mRNA in HEK cells transfected with the vaccine taken from different lots. Using this technique, the expressed proteins showed up as highly unusual looking ‘bands.’

Certain independent scientific experts have described these Western blots as the “smoking gun” evidence (particularly the “duplication” of the results) which suggest that BioNTech and Pfizer falsified key data as part of their submissions to the European Medicines Agency and the Federal Drugs Agency for securing emergency use authorisation (conditional) and later marketing authorisation approval of their product.

The bombshell evidence was dropped without so much as a ripple in the sea of brewing scandals washing up on the shores of the behemoth pharmaceutical company and its partner, BioNTech. However, some in the scientific community have taken notice and written about this scandal, known on social media as #Blotgate.

The fact there could be actual evidence to prove that Pfizer and BioNTech engaged in fraud by fabricating critical data would have major ramifications. For instance, their indemnity status (protection from any legal liability resulting from deaths or injuries caused by their product) which was written into their purchasing contracts and signed by many countries, would cease to apply. MORE

10 Comments on Evidence Suggests BioNTech and Pfizer Falsified Key Data: Part 1

  1. The data is incomplete.
    This vaccine should be in it’s third year of trials in small test groups with ongoing data collection to evaluate if it is effective and free of damaging side effects before considering offering to the general populace.
    We skipped the step that before Covid was the required norm.

    6
  2. The Covidaramma has used the Global Warming template every step of the way. It was transparently obvious in January of 2020 what was going on and nobody should be surprised how it went down.

    10

Comments are closed.