Explaining Hillary Clinton’s feud with Tulsi Gabbard – IOTW Report

Explaining Hillary Clinton’s feud with Tulsi Gabbard

AT:

The latest attack against another Democrat by Hillary Clinton is curious unless you are familiar with her past.  The former secretary of state, U.S. senator, and former first lady erupted in a tirade against Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), who is running for president.  She also provided the same attack against Jill Stein as a third-party candidate.  She implicitly labeled them both as assets of the Russian leadership.  Gabbard is a major in the Hawaiian National Guard and an American asset.  One would expect Hillary to be held to a higher standard.  But then that would differ from the history of press coverage she has enjoyed throughout the years.

Clinton still believes that she won the election in 2016.  She can’t accept that she is solely responsible for her loss.  Her supporters have followed her lead in resisting the presidency of Donald Trump.  With some Obama administration officials, they unleashed the Russian collusion hoax.  Despite the conclusion of the Mueller investigation of Trump, the matter morphed into obstruction of justice and now political abuse of power with Ukraine and military material support.  

But you have to go back to 2000 to remember that Hillary opposed the election of George W. Bush since he had not won the popular vote against Al Gore.  Later, the California absentee vote revealed a much closer vote, generally not reported by the liberal press.  Our Constitution’s Electoral College does not seem to matter to Hillary.

So why is Hillary so focused on Gabbard?  During the 2016 Democratic primaries, the party had rigged the process against Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).  It was clearly Hillary’s effort to ensure her nomination.  Tulsi Gabbard found this unacceptable and supported Sanders after resigning her high-level position within the party.  Clinton carries her grudges, and this is payback. read more

25 Comments on Explaining Hillary Clinton’s feud with Tulsi Gabbard

  1. also odd that she brings up this angle, seeing how her husband won 2 presidential elections because of a third-party candidate

    … where was her ‘conspiracy’ then?

    12
  2. One thing about Gabbard: she combines socialism with patriotism, which is a bit of a new twist. Do you suppose she sees the next demographic wave as we boomers die off?

    12
  3. President Elect Hillary Rodham Clinton has either lost the plot, or she is getting fed the wrong information from her own sources among those unemployed Macedonian Content Farmers. I’d blame it on the Chardonnay, but she didn’t seem overserved in the interview. Maybe she is feeling the stress of being targeted by the Justice Department under Attorney General Barr. She knew this was in the cards once she couldn’t control the dealer. Whatever the cause, it’s a wonderful thing to behold.

    11
  4. Don’t misconstrue my above post for any kind of support for her. She hates our Constitution. She seems to be a lot more intelligent, maybe brilliant, in manipulating the Morons. She’ll never make it to the General. She’s stepped on to many libtards toes. After this is over hopefully she starts up that new “Women Surfing Neked Channel”.

    6
  5. Neo-liberal vs. old leftist.

    The Rules, Alinsky’s rules…

    “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.”
    “Never go outside the expertise of your people.”
    “Whenever possible go outside the expertise of the enemy.”
    “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”
    “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”
    “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”
    “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”
    “Keep the pressure on.”
    “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”
    “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”
    “If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.”
    “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”
    “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

    Learn this like the Lords Prayer and, for me, the Hail Mary, for THIS is what we are up against.

    The above is their religion it is them, and we must use the above against them.

    3
  6. It is true that Hillary is infamous for holding as grudge, but it is also true she is infamous for projection.

    This leads me to believe that she is pushing a Never Trumper “republican” to run as third party candidate sucking votes from Trump. Can you say “Romney”? or is it pronounced “Kasich?”

    3
  7. Seaoh, If memory serves me correct you reside in Israel. Third Party? She’s not that smart. She’s just internally pissed off and she still stinks of rancid body odor. However people will die. It’s gonna make a great made for TV movie. In Russia.

    5
  8. Sometimes a cat fight is just a cat fight. Hellary is jealous because Gabbard is attractive, smarter, young, articulate and very skilled at making Marxist ideology palatable for progressives.
    Gabbard, a charismatic commie, refuses to bow down to her, and in Hellary’s twisted mind, that makes Gabbard a threat.

    3
  9. @Lunatic fringe: Nope not in Israel escaped PRNY (peoples republic of New York) now in Tennessee. She is ALWAYS internally pissed (a side effect of selling her soul to satan) but she is not stupid or at least wasn’t till dementia set in. I have no doubt she hates Tulsi that’s why she picked her as a Russian agent, but I suspect it is more than JUST anger.

    2
  10. Hillary conducts herself exactly like a cornered rodent. The viciousness is appalling to most normal people but then her performance is for the consumption of her fellow leftists.
    Like a playground bully she focuses her wrath on weaklings that don’t pose a threat.
    That’s not to say I have any sympathy for Gabbard, she’s just another scumbag of the left.
    I’m enjoying the show!!

    4
  11. @Youngest of Ten October 20, 2019 at 10:44 pm

    > The Rules, Alinsky’s rules…

    > for THIS is what we are up against.
    >
    > The above is their religion it is them, and we must use the above against them.

    Because, as our soon to be, new, beardy overlords (welcome be upon them), have proven: Sticks and stones are too 7th century, to work against NewThink.

Comments are closed.