Going Braless At Work is a Human Right – IOTW Report

Going Braless At Work is a Human Right

She worked at a golf course restaurant in Canada.

They asked that she wear a bra.

She said no.

They asked that she wear a tank top under her shirt.

She said no.

She said men have nipples and they don’t do that.

The golf course said that men aren’t harassed by other men who’ve been drinking when men go braless, and they don’t want that kind of trouble.

She still refused.

They fired her.

Now she’s lawyered up because she said her firing is a “human rights violation.”

52 Comments on Going Braless At Work is a Human Right

  1. So now a business is not allowed a dress code?
    50% of the population is nucking futs.
    From her visage, she could do with a nose bra.
    Maybe, a distraction from her face, is the motive.

    21
  2. Gaaagh, these stupid youngsters. Every idiotic notion is new to them. I still remember a Reader’s Digest “Laughter is the Best Medicine” quip:

    “With women going braless these days, a lot more than the red, red robin comes bob, bob, bobbin’ along.”

    Corny, huh? Yet, she persisted.

    11
  3. Sometime back in the dark ages of the 60’s or 70’s someone posted this sign in one of the dorm windows at EWSC (now EWU) in Cheney, Wa. that said, Thanks for the mammaries. If I remember right it was soon taken down by campus authorities who didn’t think it was appropriate or funny.

    8
  4. It’s a dress code. Get over it, saggy.

    I worked in retail dress store in the late 90s and I got into ‘trouble’ for not wearing pantyhose. I asked the mgr at the time if it was absolutely necessary because that shit is expensive, and the movement I had to make in the store often made the hose snag on something and there goes $7 down the drain. He said, yeah, sorry, I still had to. I said OK. And I told him I would be wearing pants from now on. I asked- Any reason I have to wear panty hose under pants? He said no, but he said he didn’t want me to give up wearing skirts. (whaaa?) I’m like— You know what? I’m good with pants. Thanks. LOL.

    Listen. Rules are rules. Had the fool said I would have to wear $7 pantyhose under my damned pants, where no one would see them, I’d have quit and gone somewhere less crazy. That pantyhose cost almost as much as what I made per hour. You don’t sue over an article of clothing. If you don’t like the rules, LEAVE.

    14
  5. I think it depends on the boobs; some women need bras, others can do without, like Sue Ellen Mishke-the Braless Wonder. I would have told her she can go braless if she signed a 4-page hold-harmless agreement protecting management when (not if) she was harassed by the drunks.

    7
  6. I am amazed that so many people seem surprised that women have both breasts and nipples. Perhaps if she worked n a school cafeteria full of horny teenagers, but I assume that most of the guests in the restaurant were adults.

    4
  7. Wow! Wowsy, wow, wow. (Thanks! Borat.)

    It’s almost… not quite, but almost… like not eating the furry green bologna, in the first place… ever… means not having to worry about the long term effects of eating furry green bologna… ever.

    Wowsy, wow, wow.

    1
  8. If she’d sign a release for the musselmen who rape her (also an affidavit releasing her “workplace” from any and all responsibility), she should get to run around naked, if she wants.

    It’s called “Freedom” – not that she has any expectation in Canada, but it sounds like the place of business is (was) simply trying to avoid legal tangles with possible “sexual harassment” accusations.
    A valuable lesson is that when lawyers are involved, nobody (except the lawyers)
    wins.

    izlamo delenda est …

    5
  9. Having a right to do something isn’t complete freedom to do whatever you want to do. Not all rights ought to be used.

    Why do so many people believe; common sense, responsibility, and wisdom are to be turned off when selecting what rights to exercise?

    3
  10. Heavens to Playtex! My, but there are a lot of fashion fascists here!

    I was in my early 20’s when I realized my bra was unnecessary, not “holding” anything up…. so I stopped. It’s never been a problem, just avoidance of hot, sweaty, uncomfortable underwear. (And my nipples still tip up and out….)

    Are all you prudes going to demand reinstatement also of the Playtex panty girdle — never mind the Playtex long line thingie — so that “jiggling cabooses” don’t wiggle and offend? …..…Lady in Red

    PS: For ladies who do remember that “rear end and tummy enhancing modesty,” recall, if you will, trying to roll the damn thing down (or unhook the back garters and pull it up) so you can go to pee — fast! — on a hot summer day.

    3
  11. I’m going to argue for AND against this horse faced idiot. There are certainly some men that I’ve worked with over the years who needed to wear a bra when it got cold. Hard to train on the new documentation system when a moderately obese man’s nipples are bringing in the air traffic over the city.

    Besides, horse faced idiots next step is going to be that she has a right to not wear panties while wearing sheer yoga pants to work so that the office debates if she has a camel toe, moose knuckle or alpaca hoof. Then she sues her company for a hostile work environment that she nurtured personally.

    3
  12. Going braless isn’t a Right, it’s a Privilege.
    And it’s only afforded to those with NICE TITS!!!

    Sorry girly, the guys at the club are just not into you…. gather up them funbags of yours.

  13. Wait…. are we sure this is a naturally born female and not some transvestite undergoing hormone therapy and is all excited about showing off the new set? Because she is kind big to be so underendowed

    3

Comments are closed.