I don’t think NBC has been hacked at all. They believe “Liberal” is now the MIDDLE, between conservative/republican and progressive/socialist. that’s the way they see it. They are seeking what THEY THINK is middle America…fools! 🙂
17
Also, most of news media do not consider themselves conservative/republican nor progressive/socialists, but consider themselves LIBERAL. They want to believe in their bubble.
11
I know and like liberals, that’s why I use the pejorative Progs, rhymes with frogs.
See spiders and snakes too.
9
If MSNBC is declaring itself liberal, that just means they’re actually radical leftists.
18
Notice it says small l liberal so is it like Liberal or liberal Liberal?
Who watches it anyway?
8
Liberal and cable television are synonymous. That part is redundant. It’s a stretch to call them American.
8
“Liberal” my ass.
“Nihilistic totalitarian” is more accurate.
Nothing “liberal” (having to do with Liberty) about them.
izlamo delenda est …
7
You don’t understand. The liberal descriptor is needed or their lemmings will not watch or believe it. When debating progressives or liberals If you use any conservative or what they think is right wing news sites they will shriek uncontrollably and call it fake news and will not believe one thing you say. They only believe anything that is labeled liberal. It does not matter if that conservative site is quoting The New York Times or the Washington Post if it is filtered through a conservative news source they feel it is contaminated and will not believe one thing about that information. If Fox News showed an actual clip of Nancy Pelosi praising Obama they would not believe it because they would feel that Fox News had altered it in some way. This phenomenon has been really happening over the last 2 or 3 years. That’s why they put the word liberal in there so progs will believe what is pushed by that particular news group. If you had the word liberal as part of the descriptor in your website front page they would practically believe anything I used as evidence in debates with them from your site. This is how fucking brainwashed, programmed and stupid they are.
4
@Anonymous December 25, 2019 at 9:44 am
> When debating progressives or liberals
If you’re debating communalists, your mind’s to short to be allowed, even in line, for the ride.
@not that annon, true that brother
The journos keep insisting that their coverage is completely unbiased. If that is the case, there should be no political descriptor at all. Definitely hacked.
2
Msnbc is a tool of tyranny. At best, it is bloomberg, which is still tyranny. At worst, it is soros, which is tyranny. But mostly soros.
I don’t think NBC has been hacked at all. They believe “Liberal” is now the MIDDLE, between conservative/republican and progressive/socialist. that’s the way they see it. They are seeking what THEY THINK is middle America…fools! 🙂
Also, most of news media do not consider themselves conservative/republican nor progressive/socialists, but consider themselves LIBERAL. They want to believe in their bubble.
I know and like liberals, that’s why I use the pejorative Progs, rhymes with frogs.
See spiders and snakes too.
If MSNBC is declaring itself liberal, that just means they’re actually radical leftists.
Notice it says small l liberal so is it like Liberal or liberal Liberal?
Who watches it anyway?
Liberal and cable television are synonymous. That part is redundant. It’s a stretch to call them American.
“Liberal” my ass.
“Nihilistic totalitarian” is more accurate.
Nothing “liberal” (having to do with Liberty) about them.
izlamo delenda est …
You don’t understand. The liberal descriptor is needed or their lemmings will not watch or believe it. When debating progressives or liberals If you use any conservative or what they think is right wing news sites they will shriek uncontrollably and call it fake news and will not believe one thing you say. They only believe anything that is labeled liberal. It does not matter if that conservative site is quoting The New York Times or the Washington Post if it is filtered through a conservative news source they feel it is contaminated and will not believe one thing about that information. If Fox News showed an actual clip of Nancy Pelosi praising Obama they would not believe it because they would feel that Fox News had altered it in some way. This phenomenon has been really happening over the last 2 or 3 years. That’s why they put the word liberal in there so progs will believe what is pushed by that particular news group. If you had the word liberal as part of the descriptor in your website front page they would practically believe anything I used as evidence in debates with them from your site. This is how fucking brainwashed, programmed and stupid they are.
@Anonymous December 25, 2019 at 9:44 am
> When debating progressives or liberals
If you’re debating communalists, your mind’s to short to be allowed, even in line, for the ride.
@not that annon, true that brother
The journos keep insisting that their coverage is completely unbiased. If that is the case, there should be no political descriptor at all. Definitely hacked.
Msnbc is a tool of tyranny. At best, it is bloomberg, which is still tyranny. At worst, it is soros, which is tyranny. But mostly soros.