I don’t care in what context our president called Meghan Markle nasty – she is meaningless to me – IOTW Report

I don’t care in what context our president called Meghan Markle nasty – she is meaningless to me

Saturday, 1 June 2019, 22:46 BFH Uncategorized 33

Who gives a $hit?

I have about as much interest in the royal family as I do the Kardashians.

Markle marries some anointed one and all of a sudden she’s floating above us?

You’re kidding, no? She’s nothing.

This royal family fairy tale crap is for women who like to muse and have fantasies.

33 Comments on I don’t care in what context our president called Meghan Markle nasty – she is meaningless to me

  5. She is a thrice married, former “yacht girl” who was shacked up with a celebrity chef in Canada when she got with the bastard son of princess Diana’s lover. Oh, and she ditched her dogs in order to stalk Harry across the globe. Sounds like a nasty little skank to me.

    24

  7. She is nasty and when that husband of hers gets over being vagmitized, he’ll figure it out, too. That marriage will not last. I would have been insulted if she joined our president for dinner.

    27

  11. She’s a narcissistic hustler, conceited poser, and traitorous scum. If President Trump called her nasty he was being kind.
    BTW, it’s disgusting and shameful the nauseating obsession too many Americans have for the “royals”. These same royals would have them subjects of the crown with very limited civil liberties. During the American Revolution good men and their families did not make sacrifices so Americans can drool over inbred imperialists.

    31

  13. Some addle headed tramp leaches onto one of the many inbred slow witted layabouts of the royal family and now thinks her words carry weight with Americans.
    Americans have an instinctual distaste for the whole concept of British Royalty and joining that clan is less than meaningless.

    15

  20. Never heard of her.
    Can’t figure out why President Trump would give her any recognition whatsoever.

    Ignore the pecker gnats.
    Keep your eye on the lions, and tigers, and bears – oh my!
    And shoot to kill.

    izlamo delenda est …

    10

  21. Actually this is all hilarious! The uppity royals have a half-breed in their clan, now with a half-breed kid, whose been married more than once. This goes against the grain of royalty, and Markle is parading around as if she’s better than all of them. I agree, this marriage won’t last, I said it from the beginning. Having the kid hasn’t sealed anything, it only made matters worse for the royal legacy. I wonder if Harry has had his DNA checked?

    11

  22. The royals would have never gone along with this if Harry had Windsor blood.
    Harry’s Da was a Irish stablehand.
    Look at the chinless Chuck the Cuck and his progeny Willy, no Chins, no Hong Kong phone book.

    5

  23. Don’t belittle this one, just like AOC they have and are getting access to POWER even though in the case of the Royals In-Breeders their dynasty will be dead in a generation.

    @ Toby Miles – excellent deep dive keep going further you are getting close to that PLUG.

    6

  24. @ghost of brig gen j glover – thanx

    she really is insignificant in the light of what else is going on, but the opportunity presented itself, so…
    The election is not until over a year from now. I don’t think it is best to throw what ever someone might have at them all at once, especially now. It is better to litter their path and try to direct them into a corner, I think. The ‘Ukranium 1’ fiasco (which includes ‘spy gate’) has to take priority, for now, for me at least.

    6

  31. They are all stupid around here. Instead of them to focus on their lives, they are here gossiping and hating on someone they can never surpass. Get over it pricks, you can NEVER get close to where she enters

    2

Comments are closed.

iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.