I agree—this is a "moral outrage & nat'l disgrace." If Congress doesn't have courage to act, let's use EOs. -O'M https://t.co/eIct6AlAKw
— Martin O'Malley (@MartinOMalley) December 5, 2015
Maryland Attorney Genera says BAN ALL GUNS
Mass confiscation once and for all.
Marty – your security detail FIRST, you maggot.
Does “getting rid of guns in this country” extend to Muzzie extremists too?
The leftwits are projecting their cowardice an an awesome display of stupidity and total lack of awareness of the world outside their intestinal-gas-filled collectivist bubble.
No executive order, not even a legislated law, will have more than a token effect on American gun ownership. But the thing that’s as obvious as a rotting corpse in a perfume shop is that any govt attempt to actually seize guns will trigger more “gun violence” than anything in US history, possibly even proportionally more than the 1861-65 War of Secession.
Obliviots. Fatally dangerous obliviots.
Molon Labe, Marty.
Please lecture us on gun confiscatio…er common sense laws instead of your complete failure in foreign policy. This is going to be a winner for the upcoming election.
Deporting 12 million illegal invaders, impossible.
Disarming 170 million gun owners, no problem.
How is it gun banning when it’s central ownership within the government? The single owner of weapons would be the most pro-gun party in the country. Let’s hear from the 1/4 billion or so citizens that died by the hands of their government in the past, after being disarmed first; do you think they might have something to say if they could talk? Oh right, let’s hear how it’s different this time…..
How dare you call them that! And no, they need them to protect themselves from Tea Party extremists. Although we will be confiscating their guns, those intolerant conservatives.
Or something like that.
BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION II
Presidential candidate Sanders proudly outs himself as a socialist, the masses swoon.
Marriage is made a farce to destroy it and the family.
America is surrendered to the Taliban, and Al Qaeda, while Marxist doctrine (multiculturalism) fostes an Islamic State homeland.
Your last resort; healthcare, is nationalized. Rationing begins.
Ninety four million Americans looking for work find none while the modern equivalent of a breadline is celebrated by the Marxists in control.
The NYT (The Daily Bolshevik) runs a front page gun confiscation editorial to distract from the Islamic soldiers slaughtering innocent Americans in California. The other two Bolshevik presidential candidates agitate for confiscation while bullets are still flying in the street fight.
If Red Barry announces confiscation, the next day will see civil war.
Can anyone say civil war? Is that what it’s going to take to get rid of this traitorous bastard? Does anyone have the guts to arrest and frog march him out of the white hut in manacles and chains if necessary if he refuses to comply? I hate to say this or even think this but what’s it going to take to make him realize he is not a dictator. God help us!
Yeah, they want a gun ban like Mexico has, where only the Police and Army can have guns.
That’s been an astonishing success. :LOL:
So if banning things actually works, then I must assume that the San Bernadino Moslem shooters used legal 10 round capacity mags, right? Because Hi-capacity mags are BANNED in Cali, and of course they wouldn’t use ILLEGAL mags to unlawfully murder people in Cali.
…and when he talks about terrorism, consider his perspective.
I his mind there are no muzlim terrorists, however Conservative Tea Party types are! Watch how he parses his words!
It would be easier for us gun clingers to eliminate all the progtards.
1. All firearms cleaned, oiled and in perfect working order. Check
2. All ammo in peak inventory status. Check
3. All household personnel have up to date training. Check
Bring it on, mf’ers.
Good luck with that Marty The Farty.
The drug cartels are armed better than the police and military in Mexico.
All you mention and, if I saw correct info, the long guns were modified to fire automatically (all illegal in Californication) versus legal semi-auto.
Go for it. See how well it works out,
As with almost all of his speeches, Little Lord Stompy Foot is going to try to have it both ways (remember his “I could no more disown” speech when he included a small line about legitimate white concerns, just to show he was fair, but devoted the rest of the speech to how white Americans should acknowledge the “legacy of discrimination … and current incidents of discrimination.”).
He is going to out-an-out say that he is not going to take your guns, and it’s silly of you to think so, but then he is going to talk about all the ways he wants to move the needle slightly further in the confiscation direction.
Myself, never owned a gun, never needed to. But I’m beginning to think it might be time for that to change. More than on a personal basis though, the idea of the government slowly stripping away the rights of citizens is abhorrent.
ISIS may have finally figured out how to kill US politicians.
They may be goat fuckers, but they ain’t stupid.
The price and availability of both weapons and ammo is going to sky rocket.
Go for it Marty. Take that bravery and be at the forefront of the confiscation. Don’t wait on the sidelines for crissakes, lead by example. Get yourself a flashlight, a megaphone and a helmet and bang on some doors!
What hasn’t?
if i got one Christmas wish…
its not like they enforced any of the previous 10,000 gun laws.
The Democrat Party is composed of two groups: The Dindoonuffins and the Doosumpins. Obama’s speeches usually either excuse the former or appease the latter. Tonight is a Doosumpin night.
Bought 2 guns at Cabelas four hours ago and background still hasn’t processed. The line to purchase/pick-up was 4 hours long. Obama is the best thing that ever happened for gun companies.
Good luck enforcing your illegal edicts you fucking progtard scumbags. Most cops are going to tell you to go fuck yourselves.
If his Attorney General is willing to violate the 1st, I’m certain he’s willing to violate the 2nd. They’ve already jettisoned most of the others.
A preview of how the left will react to the forthcoming speech:
https://youtu.be/CQWmMfjaXlc
If banning guns is such a good idea, even though an armed populace is protected by the 2nd Amendment, why doesn’t he just ban mass shootings, which AREN’T protected by ANY Amendment?
Why do I still laugh every time I see that clip? It makes me laugh every time I see it.
An executive order by Obutthole banning guns would be just as valid as an executive order by me banning him!
Come and get them
Reminds me of this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6P40wLThbc
Supposedly, they tried (unsucessfully) to convert one of the ARs to select/full-auto. Pretty much impossible unless you have access to the M-16 parts, which are pretty tightly controlled; possession of them without a tax stamp is a federal offense, as is conversion from semi-to full-auto.
The dumbest comment so far by a “journalist” was that converting from the California-required “bullet-button” mag release to the conventional push-button mag release would accomplish the semi- to full- conversion.
0bama tonight:
“74 years ago tomorrow, global warming attacked Pearl Harbor…”
Maryland called. They don’t ever want their idiot ex-governor back.
Yes, the only people who should be allowed to have guns are the same people that gave us:
1) The Patriot Act
2) Mass NSA surveillance of citizens
3) The jailing of journalists
4) The killing of American citizens without due process
5) The vilification of whistle blowers
6) Republicans as “enemies”
7) The TSA
8) An 18 trillion dollar debt
Yes, by all means, it must be the citizens who must be disarmed. They are obviously out of control.
How do you eat an Elephant?
One bite at a time.
Pick a couple of high profile gun people, send in the BATFE, kill them and their families, feed your narrative to the press.
The sheeple fall in line, handing over their arms voluntarily.
Presto-Change-O! The 2nd becomes moot.
Think that’s beyond his sense of morality?
Guess again.
They forget that there are libs who actually want to keep their guns, too.
Besides, how are they going to come and take them?
LOL
For shit sake, stop making sense!
Tim,
They could ban anything they want, including the 2nd Amendment and I still wouldn’t give up my guns.
Ever.
Obama understands exactly this – which is why he is utterly powerless in the realistic sense. Better yet – HE KNOWS that we know he’s powerless.
I’ll sleep well again, tonight.
Libs are dumb enough to think they can keep their guns.
But then again, maybe I am the dumb one?
Libs get by with everything else and conservatives are censoring themselves out of fear.
Obviously, O’Malley and his liberal ilk believe (with good reason) that the good progressives who vote him into office are completely incapable of owning any firearms – just like they are incapable of doing anything without government assistance. And I tend to agree with him – the primary threat of gun violence comes from those amoral and uneducated people who populate liberal bastions.
So let’s propose a common sense solution – gun ownership by the mentally incompetent should be prohibited, and registering or voting as a liberal or a Democrat is prima facie evidence of mental incompetence. O’Malley should then feel safer, and frankly so would I.
They won’t disarm “170 million gun owners.”
They will disarm 1 gun owner, 170 million times.
And it’s good that you are willing to die for your beliefs – because they are willing to kill you for theirs.
I see old Arnold believes in global warming too. He screwed up California, screwed his maid, now he wants to screw up America. Just cause you’re rich and famous don’t mean you got a brain.
It seems to me a simple solution to this is to remove the bastard from office. Problem solved.
Since when does an executive order affect anyone except federal employees?
The EO would be: “Disarm the Americans.”