I believe in a world where gay married couples are free to protect their marijuana fields with fully automatic machine guns. #freedom
— Austin Petersen (@AP4LP) May 8, 2016
18 Comments on Libertarian Candidate Austin Petersen
Comments are closed.
I believe in a world where gay married couples are free to protect their marijuana fields with fully automatic machine guns. #freedom
— Austin Petersen (@AP4LP) May 8, 2016
Comments are closed.
iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.
In such a “free”,
there wouldn’t BE any
“gay marriages.”
CHURCHES DON’T *DO* BLASPHEMY.
(…and, The State should stay out of it, right?!?)
He’s got the gay and illegal vote.
Hillary Clinton
@SATAN4US
I believe in a world where gay married couples are free to till their marijuana fields with the labor of illegal aliens who receive SSI benefits and to fertilize those fields with ground up human fetuses.
I believe in a world where a gay couple can “self-identify” as “married” and I can “them-identify” as deviants.
I believe in a world where people acknowledge libertarianism as being used to further promote lawlessness and iniquity, thus see it as the erosive long-term threat to the social cohesion and liberty it claims to defend.
Well, I’d like to believe in such a world.
Is it just me, or have most of them confused Libertarianism with Anarchy?
I don’t believe in worlds. Everything is ghost.
And, he’s right.
TO Ten-Ten
Well, yes they have.
But they feel SO GOOD
when the Left
tells them they’re “winning”….
Ten-Ten,
Unfortunately, it’s not just you. Despite the fact that no one actually knows how many laws there even are in this country, every year hundreds if not thousands more are added.
So, does that mean last year we were in “anarchy”? Or was it the year before? At what point were we, in fact, in “anarchy”? How much more intrusion into the private lives of citizens is needed to protect us from the dreaded “anarchy”?
Leaving consenting adults alone to do as they please on their own property seems a lot like the idea behind Constitution. It’s supposed to protect people from busy bodies who want to impose their world view on others via the legal system.
The argument that anything less than government enforcing “morality” is “anarchy” is as wrong as saying anything less than being the world police is “isolationism”.
If not for their open borders plank I’d join the Libertarian party. But betraying the national sovereignty negates the good points they make. But then, at least they’ve got the balls to put it in their platform while the GOP just lies about it.
JustAl – I agree. The Gubmint has become tyrannical and must be reigned in. But many so-called Libertarians would reject any form of Ordered Liberty as intrusive.
What’s a libertarian?
A Libertarian is defined as a braindead fake Conservative
Joan,
Think Sam Adams, Patrick Henry, and Ben Franklin
A big problem with forked tongue libertarians is the leaders support the very groups they love to hate. At their early beginnings CPUSA member and Soviet Emma Goldman, Black Panther Party, Weather Underground, Peter Theil (a member of the Bilderberg group, Mises-is infested with radical thinking Islamic authors, Ron Paul accepted money from neo-Nazi Stormfront, KKK and Christian Reconstructionist, Chris North. Folks, it just doesn’t get any more government control than those people. Just wonder if 90% of Libertarians want to get in power just to legalize dope and get high.
Freedom is not doing anything you want to do, but doing what is the right thing to do. Tyrannical governments are a very ugly thing but so is anarchy and uncontrolled goofy potheads controlling the streets..
“Leaving consenting adults alone to do as they please on their own property seems a lot like the idea behind Constitution.”
– JustAl
Riiiiiiiiight…because the Founding Fathers
were such
DOPE SMOKING FAGGOTS, right?!?
This is the textbook example of
the rose-colored glasses, almost-hippie-like
masturbatory self-image
libertarians have of themselves.
TO Joan
IGNORE “Just Al”
He clearly knows NOTHING about American history, but ALOT about propagandizing for a delusional ideology.
Where exactly did Austin encounter non-automatic “machine guns”?