Months After Contested 2020 Election, PA to Remove Dead Voters from Voter Rolls – IOTW Report

Months After Contested 2020 Election, PA to Remove Dead Voters from Voter Rolls

Western Journal

We’re all aware of the intense controversy surrounding the Nov. 3 election.

Voter fraud and election integrity became hot button issues in 2020 after several key swing states, including Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, were consistently labeled “too close to call” and many were narrowly flipped blue during early morning hours.

Nearly five months later, the controversy still simmers in various ways as states make reforms to their elections processes — as seen with Arizona’s audit of voter ballots and machines, Georgia’s new election integrity bill and now a lawsuit to remove at least 21,000 dead registrants from Pennsylvania’s voter rolls.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) reached a settlement with the Pennsylvania Department of State this week, according to a Wednesday news release on the organization’s webpage.

PILF’s lawsuit addressed a controversy that started after the foundation provided the names of the 21,000 deceased registrants on Pennsylvania’s voter rolls less than a month before the 2020 election.

more here

23 Comments on Months After Contested 2020 Election, PA to Remove Dead Voters from Voter Rolls

  1. You know I’m watching what AZ, Georgia, and other states are doing and it really pisses me off. Kemp’s a deep state asshole trying to regain Conservative credibility. Is anybody falling for this shit?
    How about AZ, Maricopa County. You Faggots have danced enough. Get it done or you are part of the problem. Been to Maricopa County recently. That might be where civil war 2 begins. People are not happy.

    12
  2. Diogenes,
    You got to be the snarkiest woman
    I ever ran across.Followed your incredible
    webz site for years.Oh BTW= Ben Franklin still
    votes in every state to this day.

    2
  3. Great.

    Now what about the lines of computer code that swapped votes?

    “self healing software” can also be “self erasing code”
    …not that I have IT friends in certain places that are very very aware of this.

    3
  4. Kcir, the thing is, the application code requires a deep forensic inspection.
    The manufacturer can call it proprietary and not allow third party inspection.
    Going forward the source code should be mandated as open source.

    Think about Volkswagen.
    They programmed vehicles to “know” when an emission test is being performed and to “lean” the intake to limit exhaust impurities.
    Got caught and cost them billions.
    I thought it was pretty clever.

    Counting votes should be the simplest fucking thing a computer can do.
    Yet these Dominion, etc. systems have a million lines of code?
    They need to get caught like Volkswagen but I have no faith anymore.

    10
  5. Curious: Is there an actual statutory law that makes it illegal for a dead voter to vote, one that specifically requires voters to be alive as a qualification to be a voter?

    2
  6. Monuments to their sacrifice & patriotism – for voting (several times each), above and beyond the call of duty (grave) – have been erected to them across the Commonwealth.

    We call them, “tombstones.”

    😡

    2
  7. Pitt, neither.

    This is PA showing its contempt for the citizenry.
    Ha ha! We did it and this proves we did it! This is the sop for you whining assholes who still cling to the remnants of the Republic and for you credulous PA-ns who will convince themselves that we’re trying to correct the situation.

    Goin through the motions … just goin through the motions.

    izlamo delenda est …

    4
  8. Bob M. – You raise an interesting point. Those “monuments to their sacrifice & patriotism” in many, many cases represent the lives of servicemen who fought for our nation. The question begs to be asked: “Are we going to let them down?”
    Another question, just as serious, needs to be asked by our police and military personnel: “Will you support Freedom and traditional American principles or take the path of least resistance and just be obedient stooge for 21st Century “Wokeness”

    5
  9. Notice the verbiage says “…requiring state election officials to compare dea th data sets from the Electronic Registration Information Center to the full voter registration database before the 2021 election.” amd “Pennsylvania also agreed to compare its voter database to the Cumulative Social Security De ath Index to identify deceased registrants, according to the news release.”

    “Require Before”. “Agreed to”.

  10. Why is it necessary to state the need to prohibit dead people from voting? Unless they are filing annual tax returns, they should have the right to vote.
    Requiring a COURT CASE to say dead people can’t vote is telling the world the country is run by people with less common sense than a two year-old.

    1
  11. Just like Democrats “agreed to” improve border security after the Reagan Amnesty.

    …Both of the actions are in future, and Democrats are world-class foot draggers, especially since NO ONE will force them to produce ANYTHING. They will either just drag it out until everyone stops asking…with THIS press, that will be about a half-hour from now…or if it’s TOO much of a problem, a nice “White Supr emacist” fal se fla g somewhere will be more than sufficient to cancel the whole thing, with or without the judges’ consent.

    …so no worries, the Penn vote remains safely in the (D) column, now, and until the end of the United States.

    …which is currently scheduled for November, sooner if the Chinese get sick of pretending and just send their guys down from Canada like they were going to anyway if we had ACTUALLY refused to accept their pup pet Biden in the first place…

  12. …sorry that was so choppy, but I was trying to find out what the heck the filter didn’t like that it kept rejecting my comment regardless of how I reworded some things or what I cut out. I ultimately found out it just didn’t like my word order choice on the very first line of my response, which ended up “He sure does”, but was going to have those SAME WORDS in a different order, and that was just NOT acceptable for…some reason…

    Censorship is weird.

    Computer based censorship is even weirder.

    WHAT ARE RULEZ, is what we would like to know…

Comments are closed.