More Vehicular Jihad? – IOTW Report

More Vehicular Jihad?

This seems to be a trend. Both Muslims using vehicles to kill, and the MSM never reporting it.

Here’s another incident that went under the MSM radar –

Creeping Sharia-

HAMEL, Ill. — Illinois State Police say a Colorado man was the driver of a truck that crashed into several vehicles on Interstate 55 in southwestern Illinois, killing four people.

Police spokesman Calvin Dye Jr. says 53-year-old Mohamed Yussuf Jama of Greeley was driving the tractor-trailer when it crashed into vehicles that had slowed or stopped in a construction zone near Hamel on Nov. 21.

Dye told the Belleville News-Democrat that no citations had been issued to Jama as of Saturday. An investigation was continuing.

The crash, which involved eight vehicles, killed 20-year-old Tori Carroll of Alhambra; 20-year-old Hailey Bertels and her 17-year-old sister, Madisen Bertels, of Staunton; and 19-year-old Vivian Vu of Joplin, Missouri.

State police investigators are reviewing Jama’s medical records, toxicology, commercial driver log books and the truck, Dye told the News-Democrat.

Jama’s 2016 Freightliner Cascadia slammed into cars on Interstate 55 with “no attempt to stop,” Dye said. The cars were slowed or stopped in traffic, ahead of the truck. The semi ran over some vehicles.

“This is one of the worst crashes some of us have ever seen,” Dye told the Illinois paper.

more

ht/ Christian PDX

17 Comments on More Vehicular Jihad?

  1. The finger wagging about “don’t drink and drive” will never be replaced by “don’t angry muzz and drive, intentionally mowing people down while screaming allahu ahkbar”. Where are MADD now? Should we create MAII. Mothers Against Islamic Insaniacs?

    One is a reprehensible accident that unintentionally kills people due to irresponsibility. The other is an intentional act.

    Oh never mind. I’m preaching to the choir.

  2. All the cool kids mix hard ball ammo in their mags these days. Just in case you need to punch through a Truck window. Of course, it wouldn’t have done much good in this particular case.

  3. The even cooler kids are nutting up and stepping back to magnum revolvers, heavy soft points and ibuprofen for the very same reason. Also they are practicing peri-body armor shots (hi mr. pelvis 😉 in Plan A responses.

    fyi

  4. Ow Your Balls.

    I see both side of the argument for Magnum Wheel guns and High Cap Pistols. But I can tell you this, you carry 6 shots into a modern gunfight and you will die. What are the odds your going to need to shoot thru a windshield compared to the rest of the threats that exist? I own a couple big frame Smith wheel guns. love them. If some one tells me “Hey, your about ready to get into a gun fight” I’ll grab a Glock first, a 1911 second.

  5. What is the “modern gunfight” of which you speak? Packs of ferals? Crew of home invaders? Road raging motorcycle gangs? Why would I die if I can hit and keep a wheel gun gassed up?

  6. Oh they can jam. Primer backing out, ejector rod coming loose: both lock up the gun. Pistols used to be carried in a brace (2 at a time) for the slow reload rate. That changed with good speedloaders. Unless you go magnum, you are still stuck with low energy deposit rounds except in a few +P+ loads in autos. Auto magnum calibers like 10killimeter suffer from unsupported chamber issues in full power loadings, that can be dangerous to the shooter. The .357 Sig notwithstanding.

    Hence some of us said “to hell with this crap” and decided to retrain on hunting caliber revolvers instead of relying on expensive, hyped ammo that many times doesn’t even perform in jello with a denim layer intermediate barrier.

    Have a gun that works that you can hit with under adverse conditions on moving targets in low light while shitting your pants on the ground shooting with your weak hand. After all that, then I would consider caliber.

    TMI?

  7. Primer backing out,

    Good thing wheel guns don’t use primers. Right? You’re reaching. Try and GAS your wheel gun as fast as I can gas my Glock. You lose. Like I said, I see both sides of this argument and any purest will lose the argument. Right now I’ll carry my Glock thank you. That might change someday. Did I also mention I carry a Black out in the back seat of my truck? I do.

  8. ReachiNg? Not hardly. Knowing your gear and its limitations is fundamental. Like I know tupperware can be reloaded faster than a revolver, I’m not stupid or a wheelgun purist. Just kill big animals, pull their guts out and eat them. I have an assortment of ungulate mounts on my wall, not one biped. Shot too many aniamls with carry auto ammo where the poor beastie didn’t die quickly due to poor terminal ballistics.

    I would not shoot an animal with .300 Blackout or again with any antipersonnel round below 5.56 or 6.8. It’s not humane.

  9. My point revolves! around a current personal disgust with antipersonnel auto pistol cartridge marketing centered around hyped terminal ballistics unproven in real world shootings. Look at the FBI’s circle jerk of the 147gr 9mm to 10mm to 40cal back to the 147gr 9mm that “failed” in 1986 Miami-Dade (but was the actual wounding round that would have stopped Platt eventually). FBI standards are 12-18″ penetration, expansion and weight retention in ballistic gelatin, not what kills a rampaging Antifa jihadi. That would be politically incorrect.

    Now the bad guys the Left is flooding our country with are wearing body armor, as are thugs and criminals. They’re using mobile intermediate barriers to slaughter innocents (automobiles).

    Unlike the feds, there is a lawyer attached to every bullet a civilian fires. If you follow the Four Rules, overpenetration should not be an issue for the civilian defensive shooting, but lack of penetration and energy deposition would be as the bad guy can continue to run his shit and kill people.

    Just consider that information. I’m glad you carry whatever you do if you are a good guy “Bad” Brad.

Comments are closed.