NEVER HIT A GIRL (Moldylocks update) – IOTW Report

NEVER HIT A GIRL (Moldylocks update)

Tuesday, 18 April 2017, 12:42 BFH Uncategorized 74

2h2 hours ago

More
Replying to

She was also wearing, on her right hand, a weighted sap glove. …which are illegal in California, by the way…

Purportedly, Moldylocks has been identified as Venus Rosales, a participator in porn. If you Bing it you can draw your own conclusion. (Yes, she is a dirty, hairy hippie, in every sense of the word.)

And, of course, there is a GOFUND me page.

73 Comments on NEVER HIT A GIRL (Moldylocks update)

  4. But honest, non-leftist, no name-calling, Trump supporting “Aggie” said the woman who got punched was just an innocent photographer, and all of us who thought she deserved it were being played by the left.

  5. The bitch is dressed for a fight and to hide her identity. Of course the media will portray her as Joan of Arc although I’m pretty sure the real Joan didn’t spend a lot of her time on her knees servicing some porn start in front of a camera. Yep, class act.

  9. Aggie isn’t a leftist.
    Aggie’s been here and has a nice comment history.
    Certain stories hit people a certain way and they speak out.
    That’s called discourse.
    I like it.

    As for Venus Rosales… she’s more comfortable in front of the camera than behind one.
    You never know where that bottle’s been.

  11. @BFH – About “Venus Rosales” – I’ve seen conflicting reports of her real name versus her pseudonyms. Is she really Emily Rose Marshall or Louise Rosealma?

    I’ve seen both those names, and a couple more. All are associated with the woman we see in the porn shots. Is it the same woman as the antifa rioter on her way to collect 100 Nazi scalps? It seems so. Yes.
    – bfh

  13. You go into battle as a man, intent to cause physical harm, you are likely to be harmed yourself. There is no more to the story.
    I’ve been working with domestic abuse victims 25 yrs now. For a more accurate update than you’ll hear from the media, men hitting women cases have been down for decades. Women hitting men & the biggest, lesbian domestic abuse, is skyrocketing.
    Too many people still live in 1985, in the minds as far as how life works. None of 1985 exists in 2017.

  14. Moldylocks will stay 100 feet behind the frontline of SwoleLefties next time, ever watchful for the inevitable retreat so she can drop her brick and bottle and run away. And the twenty media fruits who are there to video their hero’s return to battle will be right behind her.

  17. Where I disagree with Aggie is that NO LEFTIST AT A POLITICAL RIOT IN 2017 IS INNOCENT.
    Sorry if this disappoints anyone, thinking I’m a Neanderthal, but each and every leftist at a “rally” (riot) that knows their comrades are throwing rocks, bottles, fireworks, armed with skateboards (isn’t that cute?) faces hidden, etc deserves to be throat kicked.
    They are not innocent. They want to exterminate people like me. They want to fundamentally change America, and they couldn’t do it at the ballot box, so now they are using violence.

    Please, please do not say these antifa are innocent.
    We are in a civil war right now. Having sympathy for antifa rioters, even if they are just “photographers” dressed to show allegiance with the antifa cause, is being on the wrong side of the battle lines.

    Like it or not, “white supremacists” are the natural counterweight to the modern leftist who seriously want to eradicate white males.
    Blowback for all that white bashing rhetoric is to be expected.

  22. I couldn’t agree with @BFH more. That filthy subhuman deserved to have its butt kicked and some permanent damage inflicted. If we don’t win this, then we lose. The stakes are high.

  26. Here is my rule of thumb- if you show up to a public gathering wearing a mask you have my attention.

    These masked thugs are the modern day equivalent of the S.A.; they show up in mass to shut down views they disagree with and are not afraid to use violence to make that happen.

    Because of the 1st amendment I’m down with them gathering where they want and saying what they want but when they take it to the next level they need to be crushed. May our side never throw the first punch. Should these thugs throw the first may these thugs, all of them, be scrapped off the sidewalks and streets with a stick and a sponge.

    Each time they shut down a speaker they don’t like they are emboldened and it only encourages more radical behavior. When they cross the line the anvil needs to drop on them fast and hard so they can learn to keep it in the happy box.

  27. I missed the whole debate at the previous thread, so I read through it. What I think Aggie is saying (was she an eye witness?) was that the woman was there to take photos. I didn’t see anything in the photos or video so I don’t know if that’s true or not. It seems, however, that if you’re at a riot and you’re identifying with one side or another, you’re probably going to be fought against. (You’re not hands-off like the Red Cross or something.)

    Is this a one-off thing? Is this the only example of a guy hitting a gal at this thing? If yes, then it sounds like a crime of passion — this guy has a thing for hitting (presumably) weaker women? If yes, then I wouldn’t defend him.

    I also understand from Aggie that the guy is a white supremacist who is using the cover of pro-Trump to do his hitting. If yes, then though I wouldn’t agree with the guy’s philosophies, but I would agree with hitting someone if they were attacking me — male (if I didn’t think I’d get the stuffing knocked out of me in the end) or female (ditto). I’m not foolish and I like my teeth right where they are. I’m rather doubtful I would ever be at a riot in the first place.

    Bottom line: If they are both bad guys and did something wrong they should both be arrested and hauled off to jail.

  28. Not that I’m a fan of public brawls but with the Right needs to do is find a couple hardcore conservative women who can hold their own in a fight with any other woman and put them on point, under heavy male guard, just for this purpose.

  30. I originally posted it with absolutely no political dies cast.
    My premise was to discuss the oft-repeated refrain that a man should never hit a woman.
    I think that’s ridiculous in 2017.

    When the discussion veered into it being a very specific discussion of the cast of characters, I have a problem with what I’m seeing.

    The guy is a WHITE SUPREMACIST so he’s the villain, as opposed to the miserable antifa marxist???

    Sorry.
    I don’t care who is punching a violent Marxist, whether it be a male or female Marxist, I enjoy the imagery, and I condemn anyone trying to paint her as a victim, or worse yet, a hero.
    This has nothing at all to do with who is hitting her.
    Could be Hitler for all I care, she needs to be knocked the ef out.

  32. —But honest, non-leftist, no name-calling, Trump supporting “Aggie” said the woman who got punched was just an innocent photographer, and all of us who thought she deserved it were being played by the left—

    Yes I did,. I saw him attack her for being ANTIFA. I don’t condone beating people for being stupid. She didn’t hit him first, she was there to represent and take pictures. He was there the fight and decided to attack her and only her. Does a woman get a free pass if she hit or throws shit, no, and I never once posted that.

    Here we have everyone claiming she started it physically, well I don’t see any evidence of that. That has been my position in every post. I see strong evidence supporting she went to take pictures beleiving nasty NAZI Trump supporters would be there in droves. Well, one was and he zoned in on and attacked her.
    Those who beleive she started it physically, we will just not agree. But to those who don’t care, that just being ANTIFA is enough to defend him – I will never agree with that.

    I’m not choosing sides in this battle of yours. ANTIFA vs White Separtistis. I’m MAGA and neither of these groups are – only one pretends to be. Seems everyone else has chosen to support and defend what you consider is the lessor of two evils

  33. @Scott April 18, 2017 at 2:31 pm

    Woman Struck In Face At Berkeley Trump Rally Speaks Out – 847t8OfTXSs

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=847t8OfTXSs

    “I think we won this.”

    …in the vid Louise Rosealma “…corner of my eye”

    …made me smile, thanks for that.

    @Dutch Schaeffer April 18, 2017 at 8:24 am
    …iotwreport.com/never-hit-a-woman/

    …I caught a fleeting glimpse
    Out of the corner of my Eye
    I turned to look but it was gone

    BTW, what is Andria Borber?
    I think there may be a varmint in there.

  34. @ AbigailAdams, Thank you, exactly. How hard was that??

    Even in the picture at the head of this thread, she is wearing a big expense camera. Her stated goal ahaed of the rally was to take pictures. And, no, he hit her at least 3 times.

  39. Honestly, if she didn’t want to get hit then get the hell out of there. Especially if your’e wearing your Sunday best Antifa get up. This was a freaken free for all. You don’t have time to be picky about your opponents when your trying to keep from getting blind sided. Especially when she’s got a damn bottle in her hand.

  42. Who is praising the puncher???
    Most here don’t even care who the puncher is.
    I don’t.
    I care who SHE IS and what she represents.
    The media making her a victim is infuriating.

  43. And posting the Facebook entry backs up your case how?

    All of her friends are talking about beating people up.
    Funny how they aren’t saying,
    “scalps? Yes, get some good pictures!!!”

    I think you should stop digging.

  46. Oh Puh-leeze. You’re right, she was talking about scalping actual NAZI’s. With her camera. To a bunch of keyboard worriers. Dressed up like idiot ISIS JV squad.

    You’re the 3rd or 4th one now trying to separate the attacker from the attack. That he was a man is the whole point…NEVER HIT A GIRL??? Either she hit first and he was right – and, yes you’re all cheering him on Or, I am right and she didn’t, but you’re all glad he hit her anyway.-

    The fact that an awful man is who did this matters, you are – by default defending the very “NAZI” she posted about prior to the event.

  48. @Uncle Al April 18, 2017 at 2:51 pm

    > Never lose sight of the absolute need to maintain the moral high ground.

    So, you’re down wit da struggle?

    (I know, I know. For the more tone blind: The high ground, moral and temporal, is mobile. Best to move it, before you lose it.)

  49. Aggie,
    Speaken for my self, I’m not viewing this as one individual. It’s the collective. The III Percenters were there in force. I know because I was getting the E mails. I don’t know why this guy was there but I imagine he’s no III Percenter. What the “Free Speech” group did had to be done. By the way I’ve read reports that there were people that consider themselves Liberal fighting on the side of the Free Speech folks. Also if you listen to the networks, including FOX, they’re calling this a tax protest because Trump hasn’t made his returns public. That’s not what this was about. Round two is coming up soon with Anne Coulter. April 27th. Should be a real hoot.

  50. Or, I am right and she didn’t>>

    You not only are wrong, you are dreadfully wrong.

    -She might’ve brought a camera, but her goal was not to simply “take pictures.” She is seen wielding a bottle, face scarf, antifa garb and in the fracas.
    She is not a “photographer.”
    Please stop saying that, you look silly.
    – She is on camera condoning the use of M80s in bottles thrown into a crowd.
    – She is antifa, which is an organization that uses violence against the right.
    -That the guy who threw the punch was a Grand Wizard doesn’t mean shit.

    Antifa is not anti-KKK.
    They are anti-Trump.

    You ARE defending this girl, mitigating her participation in this as someone who was going to the riot as a documentarian.
    All evidence says otherwise, yet, here you are knee deep in it, still digging, implying that we are KKK sympathizers.
    You’re getting into a weird area here and I urge you to perhaps take some time and reassess what we are saying and reexamine what you’ve been saying.

    Your friend,
    bfh

  52. We strongly disagree BFH. But I would never be so presumptuous to suggest a “time out”. But it’s your board and I’ll follow your lead. I’ll go.

    But I never once suggested ANTFA was anything but trash.

    You are defending a criminal white supremest possible criminal actions – endorsing his participation in tarnishing Trump supports and Trump himself by his vile views and past. The fact he could be a grand wizard and you don’t care speaks volumes.

  53. OMG Aggie. Dude. She’s been swinging and throwing bottles at people through the crowds the entire time. She was trying to hit kKK guy with a bottle and he clocked her. And we think he was right to do it to stop her. So now you think we are sympathizing with the KKK? NO dude. We are saying if you hit you get hit back. They could be 2 church ladies with carpet bags, it could be 2 Rabbis with a sack of bagels, it could be Sonny and Cher. It doesn’t matter. It’s still the same situation. You hit, you get hit back. Period.
    Quit calling people Klan sympathizers. I’m BLACK. Hello??? Nobody here is sympathizing with either asshole. Well, except you, for some reason. Why? Because she’s a ‘woman’? Is that why you can’t admit she’s an instigator? Because she’s a woman?
    And you know what else? Those 2 scummy pieces of shit – including Mother Theresa from the heavenly bottle cloister- you’re so worried about are probably going to be dating by this weekend.
    Just stay down, the argument’s weak. She’s foul and she’s proud.

  54. Oh and you know what speaks volumes? The fact that you, Aggie, can’t deal with the fact that the broad was wrong and you’re still defending the actions of someone you claim you detest. No one here is happy to see anyone like kkk guy, in any situation used as a ‘Trump supporter’ by the LSM. And no one here is defending him. How many times do I have to say this? But the fact that you keep accusing people of supporting THAT GUY makes you as bad as the media. pfft.

  56. “You are defending a criminal white supremest possible criminal actions – endorsing his participation in tarnishing Trump supports and Trump himself by his vile views and past.”

    And YOU, dear Aggie, are defending Moldylocks who is just as vile. BFH is not defending the kkk guy, but you seem to have no problem defending Moldy.

  57. For the love of Pete Seeger, I never defended the puncher for WHO HE WAS.
    Nobody here did, to my knowledge.
    You can’t seem to get past that parsing.

    You can’t just declare “you can’t separate the punch from who it was delivered by” and ipso facto that becomes the fact.
    OF COURSE YOU CAN.

    I love that she was punched in the forehead. She DESERVED IT.
    When I first posted about this I was more interested in the man versus woman punch. That’s what the post was about, pending more information.
    Now the information is out there.

    She deserved it.

    Your position is that she didn’t, because she was there to take pictures.
    FALSE.

    Your position is she didn’t deserve it because the puncher was a neo-Nazi.
    That makes absolutely zero sense, logically.

    Your final stand is that we are Neo Nazi-sympathizers.
    This is why I asked you to think hard before continuing.
    You’re getting into a weird area because your other assertions have been proven false.
    I do not want to see you flail for the sake of an argument and destroy what I think you’ve been enjoying for a long long time here.

    And when I say that, it is not a threat of any kind, because you are as welcomed here now as you were yesterday.
    It’s just that some things can’t be unpublished and I feel you are potentially going full menderman (lol) to coin a phrase.

  60. BFH:
    Aggie can’t deal with the fact that he tripped on his dick defending that chick even after the evidence punched him in the face. So now he has no choice but to go full ree-ree.
    I’m warning every motherfucker in here to check their medicinal dosages before they roll in here calling my ass a kkk sympathizer.

  62. MJA,
    I can tell you’re upset, because that’s when you get sassy with all the colorful language.

    Aggie is on our side, this one just got away from them a little, in my opinion.

    Forgotten by tomorrow .
    All we are saying, is give peace a chance.

  68. She supports, condones, and participates in the violence. There’s a good picture of her hand holding the bottle where you can see the weighted glove she has on.

    I don’t care if she was just there to breast-feed the Antifa pajama boys on their breaks from blind-siding Trump supporters, she was a full participant and reaped what she sowed.

    I don’t care who the guy is. She came at him with a bottle and he defended himself accordingly.

  69. Say what you will about IOTWR, but we got some all-time award-winning, world-class hard-headed people* on this site, and I don’t think anybody’s gonna change their opinion on this, no matter how much discussion there is. Maybe everyone should just declare victory and go home before somebody gets hurt. Butt-hurt, that is.

    😉

    (* – and yeah, I’m one, too.)

  72. @ MJA – yes, girl! Here is Moldylocks, throwing bottles, wearing a weighted glove, and, if you slow down the video, you see she threw the first punch to the guys neck!! She absolutely deserved what she got. If you try to throat-punch someone, I don’t care who that someone is, you deserve to get hit back.

1 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Moonbattery » Charlottesville Will Help Media Whitewash Antifa Thugs

Comments are closed.

iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.