New progressive high school dress code in Austin sounds like it was drafted by a predator – IOTW Report

New progressive high school dress code in Austin sounds like it was drafted by a predator

AT-

…allowing teenage girls to dress as sexy as they want…

‘Under the new proposed dress code, students would be allowed to wear hats, sweatshirts with hood up, athletic gear and even pajamas.  Specifically for girls, spaghetti straps, tank tops, halter top and shorts of any length, as long as their buttocks are covered, would be permitted.  The draft says bra straps and underwear waistbands could also show under the new rules.
– Local Austin News

more

ht/ anymouse


18 Comments on New progressive high school dress code in Austin sounds like it was drafted by a predator

  1. There was no dress code at my Dallas HS in `73.

    Complete change from girls having to wear skirts/dresses and dudes couldn’t have hair too long, etc.

    One year of halter straps with side boobs exposed and hot pants took care of that.

    I think grade averages became better for the boys the next year. Weird coincidence, I’m sure.

    12
  2. This is only logical as follow up to the drag queens reading and performing for the little ones at the libraries.

    From the end of the article…

    “It is hard to see how the new dress code in Austin will improve the academic performance of the schools. In fact, one of its unintended consequence might be that parents serious about education will seek out private or charter schools for their kids. The schools, after all, supposedly exist to educate and civilize the young. Bringing ghetto dress — which begets behavior — into them under the guise of “inclusion” and “diversity” is not uplifting. It’s degrading. And allowing teenage girls to dress as sexy as they want in an environment filled with hormonally charged teenage boys is beyond foolish.

    Where are the adults?”

    17
  3. So in another 10 years employers won’t just have to deal with spoiled brats that think they should make X dollars an hour along with their woke crap load of demands they’ll now do this while showing up in their pajamas! Really healthy, letting the inmates run the show.

    10
  4. One of the most used question to encourage students to write on the standardized tests was about school uniforms. They had to take one side and defend their choice. I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was close to even (yes or no) for the students.

    One of the most prevalent reason that students wanted no part of uniforms was that they wanted to wear what they said made them feel accepted and fit in. What was amusing was the next comment usually was a declaration that they wanted to express their individuality.

    But the most surprising thing for me was to read that much of the male population preferred uniforms, especially for the females. They complained that the way the girls dressed was distracting for them. Wow, these must be students who take their education seriously!

    16
  5. These are children. When adults top making a brouhaha over what they are wearing, it won’t be as important.

    I lived through the change-overs in the 60s that allowed girls to wear pants to school, which rapidly devolved into into mini skirts, no bras, and hippy rag jeans. Lots of adult handwringing. Ultimately, it affected nothing. There’s no dress code in most colleges.

    Some things are best ignored. What is “distracting” is in the mind of the beholder.

    6
  6. The left has no ‘fascination’ with pedophelia, but their money donors do. Those donors buy protection, and they pay leftists to do their bidding in law-making.

    Who is worse, the perv donors or the bribed leftists?

    4

Comments are closed.