WJ:
There are those who believe that The New York Times is biased against President Donald Trump. Some would even say it is a source of “fake news.”
To them, this gem from The New York Times may come as quite the shocker. In a tweet referring to an article they published, The New York Times actually gives Trump some credit for a smart policy move:
When Trump announced the U.S. would withdraw from the Iran deal, experts feared it would hurt the economy and leave Iran free to restart its nuclear program. But, so far, the policy has been effective without either of those consequences. https://nyti.ms/2Nrkxz1
In the article, they note that there were two particular concerns when Trump announced a withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal. MORE HERE
These so-called experts are more wrong then right.
Gee Wally, a true Sherlock moment…
Yeah Beave, as in No shit Sherlock!!
Anybody could see that paying Terrorists to stop a nuclear program was sheer absolute folly intended to deceive the people of the world and to flat out rob the American people!
(one of the Øbamboozler’s biggest twofers)
If the New York Times can be so blatantly wrong about this, just think about how much else they’re wrong about!
And Shifty-Barry takes credit for the success, because he entered the Iran deal fully knowing that Mr. Trump would get out, producing the desired result.
Maybe the Old Gray Lady hasn’t totally slipped into Leftist senility.
Maybe.
And so the “experts” in the State Department are revealed yet again
as enemies of the nation.
The other shoe will drop: this is a trap.
The NY Times never admits a wrong. “Famed” economist Paul Krugman wailed that the stock market would *implode* with a Trump presidency. Now, ah, he just doesn’t mention it, but goes on with his asinine warped view of the world.
They won’t stop. ….Lady in Red
They can claim temporary sanity.
Their entire narrative is collapsing around them daily. They need at least a thin veil of credibility on occasion.
They publish lies in print and retractions on Twitter. Two different audiences for the most part, trying to split the baby in two.