Their vast carelessness drags down everyone around them, but they persevere, and even thrive.
In a mere 11 days, arrogant, selfish actions by the Clintons contaminated three of the purest brands in Washington — Barack Obama, James Comey and Loretta Lynch — and jeopardized the futures of Hillary’s most loyal aides.
I don’t agree that Obama, Lynch and Comey are pure, but this is stinging nonetheless.
It’s quaint, looking back at her appointment as secretary of state, how Obama tried to get Hillary without the shadiness. (Which is what we all want, of course.)
The president and his aides attempted to keep a rein on Clinton’s State Department — refusing to let her bring in her hit man, Sidney Blumenthal.
But in the end, Hillary’s goo got on Obama anyhow.
Obama doesn’t need Hillary to get goo in the end.
On Tuesday, after Comey managed to make both Democrats and Republicans angry by indicting Clinton politically but not legally, Barry and Hillary flew to Charlotte, N.C., for their first joint campaign appearance.
Obama was left in the awkward position of vouching for Hillary’s “steady judgment” to run an angry, violent, jittery nation on the very day that his F.B.I. director lambasted her errant judgment on circumventing the State Department email system, making it clear that she had been lying to the American public for the last 16 months.
The last 16 months? You sure you don’t mean 25 years?
And what about Obama’s lies?
Obama angered F.B.I. agents when he was interviewed on CBS’s “60 Minutes” last fall and undermined the bureau’s investigation by exonerating Hillary before the F.B.I. was done with its work, saying pre-emptively, “This is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”
Hillary willfully put herself above the rules — again — and a president, campaign and party are all left twisting themselves into pretzels defending her.
Trump is worse. Just ask our right-wing #NeverTrump morons.
ht/ fdr in hell
Interesting story but you have to wonder why the Times which is so left wing would allow a story like this to go to print. You’ll notice the complete support for Obama as well as Comey and Lynch as if Clinton was the only bad actor in this mess. There has to be another reason why this is going through because you have to know that parts of it will appear on GOP campaign ads and could be devastating.
In a mere 11 days, arrogant, selfish actions by the Clintons contaminated three of the purest brands in Washington — Barack Obama, James Comey and Loretta Lynch — and jeopardized the futures of Hillary’s most loyal aides.
That is where they lost me.
The phrase “vast carelessness” was not an accident in a piece where the NYT has done the work of the VWRC. Deep in the bunker, Hillary is seething. There is sure to be a big Hillary puff-piece next week in the NYT.
They spewed, “…three of the purest brands in Washington — Barack Obama, James Comey and Loretta Lynch.” HAHAHA
Still, I’d have loved to see the Scrut’s face this morning when she saw that.
“Three of the purest brands in Washington – Barak Obama, James Comey and Loretta Lynch.”
DAFUQ!?!?!?
Looks like howler monkeys in the shit-filled cages of Dhimmos flinging shit at each other to me.
scr_north – Trust me when I tell ya, I don’t spend a single second wondering how these assholes think. They are purely agenda-driven howler monkeys (as above). I prefer to deal in facts and common sense, neither of which are available in the NY Times.
Contaminate, devistate, ala Paula Jones and co. And in the case of Vince Foster and others, eradicate.
Don’t overlook the fact that this is an OpEd piece by Maureen Dowd.
Plus, its sole purpose is to bolster the credibility of Barack Obama, James Comey, and Loretta Lynch.
Credibility? Ha, I crack myself up. 🙂
It’s a shame Killary is blocking the r in that photo. 😉
The left, including Comey, continue to characterize the actions of the clintons as “carelessness”.
Horse hockey.
This was calculated and deliberate, not some oversight. It was a coverup of criminal activity and the means by which to hide their actions.
1. This is about “The Obama Legacy”
2. She was ‘this close’ to causing revelations, through her emails being made public, to his impeachment based on his personal role in ‘her’ scandals.
3. The Most Historical Black Presidency In The Whole Wide World trumps everything.
4. Based on #3, the NYT’s has as much to lose as Obama.
It only confirms that the Clintons and the Democrats are the biggest Mafia family in this nation.
This is obviously the first shot fired by Carlos Slim (Mexican billionaire) and the rest of the Globalists at the NYT to get either Bernie or Biden as their next designated POTUS patsy.
Concur with all of the posters’ assessments re the “three tainted brands”. Soiled, and laughably so, from the very beginning. I did, foolishly, hold out hope for one brand that got thoroughly debased – the FBI.
So even though he couldn’t keep a rein on her in the State Dept.,and she still consulted Blumenthal, he endorses her anyway. And does anyone think the NYTimes and Mo Dowd won’t endorse her between now and Nov??
The Clintons are “Contaminators of everyone they touch”, but the damned NY Times has been approving of these two Grifters for 25 years !
Another horseshit article from a dipshit writer of the NYTs. 😡
The headline of the editorial is designed to capture as many readers as possible. There’s knee-deep propaganda in that article. “Roll up your pants; it’s too late to save the shoes.” 👿
Vast carelessness…. wow.
Maureen, you heavy hitter you.
The last time I ever heard of such “vast carelessness” is when we got real careless during WWII and mistakenly dropped nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Oopsies!
The fortunate thing for us is that the Obamas really care only about the Obamas, and the Clintons really only care about the Clintons. So they wheel and deal and support each other, but when things get really tough they are ready to throw the others under the bus.
I still wouldn’t wipe my ass with the NYT. They’ve been in be with liberal/socialist/communist/treasonous TRASH for over a century.
If civil unrest overcomes this country, they deserve no less than to get locked in their building as the mob burns it to the ground.
been in bed with
Comey may not have recommended criminal prosecution, but in both his press conference and testimony before Congress, he exposed Hillary Clinton as the liar and corrupt politician she is and tossed her under the bus. During this election season, and particularly prior to the Democrat convention, Comey may have done more damage to a Democrat bid to keep the White House than anyone because Hillary is now known as obviously corrupt, but there is no apparent reason to replace her as the nominee.
There is no way the Times can spin this as anything other than what it is, and in a temporary moment of sanity the Times didn’t even try. The only tack they can take is “not all Democrats are grifters,” which in and of itself is pretty incredible. The Times actually would prefer to have Warren, Sanders or Biden as the nominees (in that order), but that is unlikely. The next available alternative is to try to repair the Democrat brand as a whole while recognizing that there is a turd in the punch bowl.
NYT editor thinking “That’s the last time we hire an intern just out of Journalism 101. Now I gotta go apologize to Hillary.”
“Carelessness?”
Give me a fuckin break …
Since when is Treason “carelessness?”
“Carelessly” set up 2 private servers.
“Carelessly” extorted money from foreign governments.
“Carelessly” set up Amb. Stevens to be assassinated.
“Carelessly” deleted 30,000 e-mails.
“Carelessly,” though repeatedly, lied about it.
“Carelessly” had her ex-Preznit husband meet Lynch.
We really are a bunch of stupid fucks to eat the shit they’re shovelling.
izlamo delenda est …
Sorry burner…accidental thumbs down.
CUNT.