Apparently, the Blue-Check Twitter ResistanceLOL has never heard the old saying, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.” Then again, unless it appears in one of the Harry Potter books or “The Handmaid’s Tale,” how would they?
One day after a federal judge ruled that the documents seized in the FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago must be first reviewed by a Special Master, the Washington Post published yet story that is based entirely on anonymous sources, or as they like to call them, “people familiar with the matter.”
In this latest anonymously sourced “report,” the people familiar with the matter are claiming the FBI found a document related to a foreign country’s military defenses and nuclear capabilities.
And every fool who fell for every other anonymously-sourced “hair-on-fire” report about Trump immediately pounced on the story, screeching about treason and sedition and putting Trump in prison.
Let’s leave aside for a moment that the same Department of Justice that doesn’t think Trump can be trusted with classified materials can’t be trusted not to leak information from classified materials to the Washington Post.
Only a fool would fall for this story.
In the last six years, how many of these explosive, anonymously-sourced articles in the Washington Post, or anywhere else for that matter, withstood the test of time? more
Only a fool would be on Twitter. What’s the point?
Yeah, I remember when Rachel Maddow had Trump’s tax returns.
but but Orange [blah blah blah] drink bleach [blah blah blah] hateful misogynist [blah blah blah] big lie [blah blah blah] raycis [blah blah blah] insurrectionists [blah blah blah] treasonous magat [blah blah blah] muh democracy.
It must be so tiring spinning the same shit day after day, year after year and have absolutely zero effect other than tanking your own network/newspaper/party when excitement cranks up to 11 everytime 3 bombshell words are added to talking points, that will for certain bury Trump this time, and are always, ALWAYS, nothing burger fabricated bullshit lies.
Yeah, but THIS time, we got him!
WaPo has also geen recently exposed as posting supposedly “secret documents”. If these docs were all that “secret” then why is WaPo circulating them? Fed agencies should be alerted to WaPo’s treason. Also in view is AoL’s Huffington Post (associated with George Soros) has been spreading false rumors that “death threats against Joe Biden” have been issued by the right ever since Biden engineered the Trump mar-a-lago seige in a fit of typically-Biden jealous rage.
WaPo has also geen recently exposed as posting publicly Trump’s supposedly “secret documents”. If these docs were all that “secret” then why is WaPo circulating them? Fed agencies should be alerted to WaPo’s treason. Also in view is AoL’s Huffington Post (associated with George Soros) has been spreading false rumors that “death threats against Joe Biden” have been issued by the right ever since Biden engineered the Trump mar-a-lago seige in a fit of typically-Biden jealous rage.
Basically, anything that is “sourced” anonymously in ANY media forum is a total lie, foul bullshit, and most likely provocation by spooks.
And usually “sources familiar with …” is just made up shit by the maggot writing the propaganda piece.
Only an acknowledged cowardly liar would refuse to have his name associated with a purported furtherance of “truth.”
But we are no longer a society of discernment. We are an inflamed mob of morons.
mortem tyrannis
izlamo delenda est …
Those are only ‘secrets’ because nobody will tell Biden, or Biden was asleep at the time of the briefing, or in Delaware, …
its the same old thing, with a new coat of paint
the ‘wrap up smear’ explained:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4785397/user-clip-pelosi-explains-the-wrap-smear
“… and then they merchandise it.”
Why do all of our enemies give billions to democrats?
I sometimes read military-type sites and quite often will encounter “a document related to a foreign country’s military defenses and nuclear capabilities”. Just read one today discussing Ukrainian vs Russian military defenses and nuclear capabilities”. Anonymous sources along with mere documents is a broad domain of ambiguity and is like catnip to simple minds.