Frontpage: One of the distressing aspects of the police probes against Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is that police seem to be attributing criminality to normal policy-making.
To date, the Bezeq-Walla investigation, dubbed Case 4000 by the police, is being presented as the mother lode – the probe that will sink Netanyahu.
Case 4000 exploded last week with pre-dawn arrests of some of the most powerful people in Israel. Telecommunications giant Bezeq’s owner Shaul Elovitch, his wife, Iris, and their son Or were nabbed in their beds. So was Netanyahu’s former communications chief Nir Hefetz and former director-general of the Communications Ministry and Netanyahu confidante Shlomo Filber.
The headlines screamed “Bribery!” And the reports were no calmer.
The media reported that the police have hard evidence Netanyahu and Filber colluded to give Netanyahu’s crony Elovitch hundreds of millions of shekels in tax and regulatory breaks for Bezeq. In exchange, Elovitch, who also owns the popular Walla Internet site, agreed to give positive coverage of Netanyahu and his wife, Sara, on Walla’s news site.
Before we could consider the evidence, Netanyahu’s fate was sealed. He was a goner.
But when the smoke cleared, it became apparent that there isn’t anything there.
Netanyahu and Filber did give Bezeq and its subsidiary, satellite television provider Yes, regulatory and tax breaks.
On the regulatory side, the Communications Ministry agreed to end the forced separation between the two commonly owned corporations.
As Eli Zippori noted last Friday in Globes, far from being a criminal conspiracy, the move was perfectly sound policy. By allowing the two companies to work together, the government improved the lot of consumers. Together they could offer the public discounted service bundles that include landlines, Internet service and television service.
Moreover, in exchange for permitting them to work together, Bezeq agreed to permit private Internet providers to operate off of its communications infrastructure. Today, Zippori noted, 550,000 Israelis receive Internet through such services.
Would another policy move have brought better results for the public? Maybe. But that doesn’t mean this policy was wrong or criminal.
As for the tax breaks, it is true that Yes received hundreds of millions in tax relief. Yet as Zippori noted, Yes’s corporate losses topped a billion shekels. The Income Tax Authority routinely gives tax relief to corporations that lose money. And the higher the losses, the higher the tax break.
Would it have been better for the government to discriminate against Yes? Maybe. But that doesn’t mean this policy was wrong or criminal. MORE HERE
This is about character assassination by the left everywhere in the western world.
They can’t win on policy so destroy the leaders who appose them. It’s all about control and that requires deceiving the public.
The two men I admire most in todays world, Netanyahu and Trump, are under constant attack by the media and the left.
There must be something wrong with my judgment?
Jews for SELF-Extermination. 🙄
You wonder HOW something like the Holocaust could’ve happened… then you see the Jewish Left, TRYING to exterminate their own, who try and save them from their own luncacy! :nuts:
I guess Soros came by it naturally… 😳
My first exposure to Bebe was a speech he gave sometime during the Clinton or Bush presidency.
I kept thinking, as he was talking, that I wanted him for our President.
It’s the same BS used on PDJT; it’s a surprise to find that even Jews faced with the always prevalent and evident hatred and discrimination that some would want to commit suicide by antisemitism and progressive
political movements that are anti-religious identity.
What – no mention of the video of Bibi urinating on two Iranian prostitutes?
What – no mention of the video of Netanyahu urinating on those two Iranian prostitutes?
Nate. Not yet give them time.