Tapper, a wet fart in a tailored suit, tried to go toe to toe with Rand Paul on climate change and was made to look like an idiot.
All Tapper had left was to quote a loon at NASA who says the world is in peril.
The only question Rand Paul didn’t ask of the vapid Tapper was, “if the world is in such peril, why are some countries exempt from having to do anything about it?”
You’d have to be a complete moron to think this has anything at all to do with rising sea levels if China doesn’t have to reduce its energy levels.
Enter Tapper.
See Rand Paul HERE
“elections matter … and I won”
Barakkk Osama
LOL!!! And ewww.
Rand pointed out at least 3 times that certain countries were exempt and Tapper still didn’t catch it or refused to. The boy is just dumb, or he’s trying to pretend he’s dumb. But the end result is, he is still dumb for different reasons.
“You don’t like a particular policy or a particular president? Then argue for your position. Go out there and win an election,”
Obama
“Simpleton” is being kind.
An anchor wears makeup and repeats whatever the voice in his earpiece tells him to say.
SIRI could do the job cheaper and more entertainingly, with a choice of accents.
Eventually the dying legacy networks will resort to Topless News. Only a matter of time.
Jake Tapper actually said “but not to the degree we’ve seen in the last century”. Oh the humanity. No wait, its not the humanity, its CLIMATE. And man doesnt influence it. Cant even accurately predict the temperature 3 days hence. And besides that, ITS ABOUT THE MONEY AND CONTROL OF IDIOTS. geez.
“How much climate change is man made versus caused by nature?”
That needs to be taken one step further, Rand.
Since humans are part of nature, why are we not afforded the same rights as every other living natural thing on Earth? Heck, just ants and termites alone emit more carbon than humans. Beavers raise water levels everywhere they are. Protect the elephants? Why, a single elephant is the same thing as 55 belching humans.
Humans are expendable. That’s why. Save the frogs, fruit flies, and locust. Fuck sake.
way to go Rand!! China was able to grow emissions until 2030
sounds like a great deal for America.lol Once again Obama sold the US out!
Notice how conservatives wind up laughing at the talking head more often? Earlier this week it was Sununu — that was a great interview! Now, Paul. Maybe these guys and gals should consider a career in stand up, ’cause making up fake stories and getting a laugh is what that’s all about, right? We should just go ahead and call them comedians.
…except Megyn Kelly. Did anyone else see the picture of her sit down interview w/Putin? Someone said she looked like a “high-priced call girl.” She was wearing an off the shoulder blue velvet dress that was split to the upper, inside thigh and black stiletto heels. She said, “Vladimir, Vladimir. Are you ready for me?” I think the story was at TGP.
As for the wording, MAN made climate change. Men as a whole aren’t bad, yet every bad thing is named after men. Go figure. How about a study on climate change caused by nature, man, and woman. As long as we’re on the political topic of climate change.
I’m still laughing at “a wet fart in a tailored suit.” BFH, you silver-tongued devil! 😂
Note the leftist interview technique of simply alleging something then quickly following with a diversion to another “point”. Paul doesn’t let Tapper get away with that pure bullshit.
The vaunted computer climate models have been historically wrong, and wrong to a large degree. Since the liberal global warming hysteria has been based upon predictions of the future as generated by computer climate models, maybe we should examine why before we jump off the cliff in the name of climate change.
But even though the computer models are wrong, the climate is changing and we are in a warming period. Yes, the climate is changing, and has been in continuous change for over 4 billion years. The climate warms (for example the medieval warming period) and the climate cools (various ice ages). Ice shelves are shrinking, but sea ice is getting thicker. Glaciers come and go, and despite the predictions that the ice caps would be gone by now, that hasn’t come to pass. Maybe we should study this instead of ignoring the facts.
Once, I won a large pot at poker by drawing to an inside straight. So yes, you can win at poker by drawing to an inside straight, but you won’t survive as a professional poker player by doing this as a strategy. But when it comes to climate change, this is what the liberals are proposing to do – at considerable expense.
“Debating” that “wet fart in a tailored suit (PERFECT, Fur!!), Fake Crapper is like shooting carp in a small barrel with a large shotgun.
I believe in climate change…..it’s called WEATHER.
Remember the premise of Jurraisic Park, the book?
Scientists brought back dinosaurs and altered them so that they couldn’t reproduce. Then set up sensors to do a periodic inventory. To monitor for escapees from the island.
Their computer models said they had X number of dinosaurs so as long as their inventory didn’t show a population decline everything was cool.
But, like all programs, assumptions or preconceived notions can lead to inaccurate results. It turned out the dinosaurs were able to reproduce but the computer model wasn’t able to detect that.
And, as a programmer I’ve witnessed the same tunnel vision repeatedly.
Same goes with these climate scientists who engineered a model to achieve their desired ideological outcome. I can’t do that with my accounting department clients.
But so far I’m not being chased by any velociraptors either.
Jake…..and here’s your ass
I thought That Rand Paul MD handed that to him on a platter!
PHenry, it’s those damn Excel spreadsheets.
“Are you saying that you don’t believe NASA scientists?!?” Jake, when they start making 100 year weather forecasts – I DONT BELIEVE THEM.
Climate modeling is junk science that has not provided any ROI. The government should stop funding it. We’ve spent probably hundreds of millions on these climateering wild goose chases, with nothing to show for it (except we know that the models are poor and place too much emphasis on carbon dioxide as a driver of climate dynamics). Shut ’em down. and sea level is rising at a rate of about 7-8″ a century as best as I can tell by looking at all the numbers. Less than a foot/century. Nothingburger