Real or Fake, the Uploader of These Documents Is in a Lot of Trouble – Maybe It is Worth It to Them – IOTW Report

Real or Fake, the Uploader of These Documents Is in a Lot of Trouble – Maybe It is Worth It to Them

UPDATE: Either Twitter took the posts down or the original uploader got cold feet and took the posts down. Either way I am told the docs can still be viewed at Lame Cherry  HT/ Turd Burglestein

I would be wary reposting these images. Point to them, but don’t host them on your server. There are, as Andrea points out, strict HIPAA laws that you *might* be violating by hosting them on your server. 

Take a look at these. My instincts say FAKE, but you never know.

I checked out Hillary’s itinerary for the dates listed on these documents and she was in town both of those days.

The doctor is the same one that released the findings of her physical earlier this year.

The phone number is right, but the medical group changed names recently. I don’t know when that happened, I’d have to research it.

There’s just something too pat and too “plain languagy” about them.

I’m left wondering if the person who did this, if they are fake, is in a world of trouble.

And if they are real, they are in a world of trouble, but they just might have saved us from this wretched woman.

24 Comments on Real or Fake, the Uploader of These Documents Is in a Lot of Trouble – Maybe It is Worth It to Them

  1. Lizzie Warren says yup, heap big trouble.

    Finite number of people having access to this kind of information – on paper, no less – makes for an easily discernible target range. I can’t believe someone is that stupid. Oh wait.

  2. I dunno if they’re real or fake, and it could be a ruse by Hillary’s own witches coven to destroy any attempts to peg her. I don’t understand why the twitter poster would admit to having been a former employee. “Former employee somewhere” Really? Dead giveaway? Hmmm…. (Can we get in HIPPA trouble for posting them if they are real? )

  3. If Hillary weren’t a Democrat,
    I’d say it was a fun political trick
    often used on Republicans…
    …to sort of squeeze/force them
    into “proving” the info is false.

    Since she *is*, it’s a notingburger.
    (…or worse, a false flag
    planted by a Dem to blame Trump…)

  4. If only…
    http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/binswangers/binswangers.htm

    Presuming this is real, who is the report for? The patient? Surely not a part of the medical because there would be no need for letter head.
    The format of the identifying info is odd.
    My doctor and his staff has trotted around the office and in exam rooms with tablets for quite some time. They give me a printed reported after each visit but the format is considerably different.
    All vitals are shown and the report is very detailed including a listing of medications, OTC drugs and supplements.

    This looks like a 1/2 assed try by an amateur.
    What would be interesting is if Assange’s bomb shells included access to Killary’s Patient Portal, assuming there is one, and her medical records.

    Any bets on how long before the info poster and the Doctor commit suicide, disappear or are hit and run victims?

  5. Best to find Dan Rather and ask him how it’s done. Or you can always call little green footballs (when you stop laughing) who is the world expert on this kind of thing?

  6. The thing that gives me pause is having the SS# on the report (although blacked out). I’ve never,ever gotten any medical bill, report, test result etc that ever had my SS# printed on it. Can’t say that for everybody, just me personally.

    But I agree there’s a good chance its a false flag operation by the Dems. Hillary will cry look at what they are resorting to and the lofos will eat it up.

  7. As real as Obama’s fake BC which Trump forced him to manufacture.. It’s Stray Voltage to deal with all the short-circuits and the sudden spotlight on Ratchet’s nurse.

  8. If this letter had been written for an individual, that person’s name should have been mentioned. If it had been created as a purely clinical document, it would not have been written in this format. There would also be a lot more technical medical jargon.

    Whoever did this should have made it addressed to Hillary, in the form of a doctor-to-patient diagnosis. That way it would be more believable.

    IMHO, anyway.

    🙂

  9. “positron emission tomography (PET) brain scan”
    Is the test a MD would use to conclusively diagnose clinton’s “ailment”.The MD seems to have already diagnosed clinton using a MRI, so her problem is acute or this is BS.

    There is enough, verifiable, evidence available to prove clinton’s incompetence without making stuff up. Giving the opposition an excuse to pin a “foil hat” on you doesn’t do the cause any good.

  10. I worked for a doctor. Typed all his correspondence. Took me years to semi-understand what he was saying. These letters were not written or dictated by a medical doctor.

  11. Fake.

    If this is written as a clinical note, it’s missing pretty much everything a clinical note should have. SOAP format is used pretty universally, even after residency. There’s no details of a Physical Exam, not even vital signs. They talk about having performed a MMSE…what was the score, and I’d like to see it broken down by section, please. The diagnosis section has no coding remarks. The treatment plan is written narratively, which some people do, but it’s far more common to write it as a numbered list.

    The biggest red flag for me is there is no mention of the patient’s existing medication list.

    OTOH, if this is written as a letter from one clinician to another, the entire write-up is wholly inadequate.

    I’m a pathologist, not a neurologist, so this is not my area, but I’m pretty sure I’d want to do a bit more testing than a MMSE. Where’s the CT, MRI, EEG, and basic blood work-up?

Comments are closed.