Just The News
The FBI’s decision to open a probe that treats the last decade of political weaponization of law enforcement and intelligence agencies as an ongoing criminal conspiracy is being cheered by lawmakers and could be aided by Director Kash Patel’s recent discovery of a room where the bureau had “hidden” evidence from public and congressional view.
Patel’s discovery of the evidence “vault” or “lockbox” as he called it on a recent interview with podcaster Joe Rogan and the opening of the “overarching conspiracy” probe occurred around the same time this spring, officials told Just the News.
The discovery that the FBI stashed away evidence in politically hot probes like Russigate could help prosecutors convince a grand jury that government officials were engaged in a coverup or an effort to deprive civil liberties, experts said. more here
have that grand jury convene in a red state and prosecutions will flow
You lock the door
Throw away the key
There’s someone in my head
But it’s not me
Let the executions begin.
For much of my adult life, I’ve been keenly aware that Truman’s firing of MacArthur was probably the biggest mistake of the 20th Century. Nixon’s is right up there, too.
The usual… overplaying the hand… dragging it out until the statute of limitations is past. I hate this time wasting shit. Just write off ever bringing these assholes like Comey to any kind of real justice and work on loading up the FBI with actual patriots and fix the mess those cocksuckers made.
And the moon may grow grass.
“May aid ‘grand conspiracy’ inquiry”. WTH inquiry?? Aren’t people arrested first, charges get filed next, Grand Jury hears cause and then…oh shit, there goes the alarm clock again
Hi, Comey files!
See you soon!
Bondi really did a lot of damage. She totally beclowned herself in the process. Wayne Root has solutions:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/07/wayne-root-3-price-1-heres-how-trump/
Should used the “Sure, Jan” thumbnail.
Way back in the 1970s I wrote an essay in junior high school in which I argued that whenever I see the word may published anywhere I add not and read the article with may not statements replacing may statements. I argued that the author, editor and publisher has absolutely no grounds on which to complain or object. Anything that may result may not come to fruition. If they have any legitimate grounds upon which to protest they forfeited them when they chose not to quantify their statement. In adding reading may as may not I have unequivocally changed absolutely nothing of consequence in the story.
You know the Meme with Lucy, Charlie Brown and the football?
I’ve been feeling a lot like Charlie lately.