Heather has two biological parents. One is a lesbian, and the other parent is… a lesbian?
Whomever a mother lists as the father is now “legally the father, ” as if they had anything at all to do with the biological birth. Even if it’s another woman, it’s “the father.”
I’m not sure how the two gay guys claim that one of them is the mother, but that’s not for me to contemplate because we did not get to this state in this country through any sort of contemplation.
ht/ all too much
I’m going to assume at least one of the parents still has to be human…?
Meanwhile, the FATHER of our COUNTRY is rolling in his grave…
Have the women produce their own sperm biologically, and have the men menstruate, lactate, and give birth. If they can do those things, then by all means, scribble your names on that bullshit piece of paper.
In the meantime, don’t go to court to ask for any money out of the true biological parent because that kid’s father doesn’t owe you squat. And don’t come asking the taxpayer for shit, either.
In the meantime, thanks for the warning. We’ll be expecting some confused, mentally stressed children coming from these people.
The major problems with this are obvious, but when the child goes to the doctor and talks of parental medical history this approach erases one true parent and any ability to ascertain that.
Heart disease, diabetes, etc.? the child’s needs are of no concern in reverence to the two selfish people who did this to the child.
Does this free the sperm donor from ever having to provide child support payments? And likewise, does this obligate the other parent to be subject child support, up to and including college tuition?
The children become play toys. An accessory. Only the babies suffer.
Wisconsin doesn’t have to change a thing to accomodate this situation.
I found out first hand they do not give a flip who the Father is. If she is married – the husband always gets named on the certificate.
There is no place on the form for Father.
You can have 10 different Fathers and it is mandatory the husband will always be named on the birth certificate.
You may think I’m splitting hairs, but I’m not. Divorce are not allowed when the woman is pregnant – at least in 1978 it was like that. That pretty much guarantees the child’s actual Father will not be named if a separated woman becomes pregnant and wants to marry the child’s Father. No dice. Divorce after the child is born and then you can’t marry for 6 months.
Anthony Kennedy can’t retire fast enough and Ruth Ginsberg can’t expire fast enough.
This makes absolutely no sense.
So sad for the children.
It’s all for the children. Isn’t that what leftist scumwads keep telling us?
The children being adults who remain children their entire lives. Real children? With real needs? Well, they are accessories as MJA aptly put it.
If a woman goes out and screws around on her husband and gets pregnant and has the baby, who’s name is on the birth certificate?
If a woman is single, gets pregnant by a dirtbag and then comes to her senses and marries a man prior to the birth of that child, who’s name is on the birth certificate?
Non biological parent. I am guessing that is the basis of the decision. Don’t agree with it but how do you argue against it. Just like now with the advent of same sex marriage how do you argue against polygamy or any other perversion.
I’m pretty sure GOD has something to say about this.
Dianny – It makes perfect sense.
It is another way the left can stop evil President T from deporting people here illegally. Put a name in line 5 (or what ever the Father like is) of a Birth Certificate and they can claim protection from deportation by the 14th Ammendment. If not protected completely, at least delayed by the court until the case can heard.
Another decision they had no authority to make!
being a child of american citizens, who was born overseas, i recently had to apply for a new State Department Birth Certificate…..in order to get MY DRIVER’S LICENSE RENEWED…..yeah, big fricking deal, right???
yeah, this is how far we have fallen…..
it has “parent number one” and “parent number two” on it….there is a space for “parent number three” in case mommie was a surrogate……
i hate having that birth certificate…..my original birth certificate said my mom was married to my dad, i was was their kid……
now i have one that says some people had sex and i was born…..ain’t quite the same, somehow……go figger……..
Once again, the pseudoscience of Wishful Thinking promoted by the left, overrides the real science of genetics. Thanks, the supremely dense SCOTUS.
Since no one asked:
“Who’s your daddy?”
What time-honored Constitutional guarantee did this fall under?
I once wrote that Satan sits in DC – now we know where in DC!
And these are purported to be “learned” judges?
What a crock of BULLSHIT!
izlamo delenda est …