Senate Intel Chairman Comments on Brennan Security Clearance Revocation

11 Comments on Senate Intel Chairman Comments on Brennan Security Clearance Revocation

1. My whole Life I’ve wondered who Satan would Embody, now I may know.

   7

2. Revoking his security clearance can only be the first step.

   20

3. Trump should come out tomorrow and make it retroactive.
   Effective November 9th, 2016

   MSM implodes…again.
   Bwahahahaaha! 🙂

   7

4. Just asking, does this guy have a security detail paid for by tax payers. I’ll bet my skinny ass he does. Pull it. Now. Lets see how brave he is after that. Fucking coward.

   26

5. Plock his as down in front of the Intel Committee again, under oath, and see what he has to say. When are these guys going to face perjury charges if Mueller got to go after Flynn?

   8

6. I like the statement. It essentially says “you can have a dildo shoved in your mouth, or you can be slapped in the face with one, but the dildo shoved up your butt is staying.”

   Politics rocks.

   7

7. I think Plantsman is on to something. A small set of horns coming out of Brennan’s head would look perfectly natural on him.

   4

8. Richard Burr really issued that statement? He’s one of the deepest of the deep swamp guys! Surprise, surprise as Gomer would say!

   6

9. If the swamp rats start throwing each under the bus,
   we’re going to need more buses.

   (I don’t recall where I read this comment yesterday
   but it made me LOL so I’m passing it along!)

   5

10. Pffft. Butthole Burr protecting his bunghole. In addition to diverting attention away from McCain, he and Warner are up to their turkey wattled necks in the Russia probe. I maintain McCain never had brain cancer.

    6

11. Burr and Warner are the head of the corrupt Senate Intel snake. Anybody remember Warner colluding with Steele for a private meeting?
    Anybody remember the Senate Intel staffer that was schtuping and leaking to the reporter-ette?

    Anything Trump/Russia related coming out of this committee is pure BS…including this a$$covering statement from Burr.

    1