DC: The Supreme Court rejected an unusual challenge to Matthew Whitaker’s appointment as acting attorney general Monday.
The challenge arose in the context of a Second Amendment case from Nevada, where an independent political activist named Barry Michaels challenged a provision of the Federal Gun Control Act which prohibits convicted felons from possessing firearms. Michaels’ convictions were for non-violent crimes and he has lived in accordance with the law for 20 years.
Whitaker became the named defendant in Michaels’ case when he was appointed acting AG. Shortly thereafter, Michaels and his attorneys filed a motion at the Supreme Court challenging Whitaker’s appointment.
The motion argued that a federal law called the Attorney General Succession Act controls the accession of leadership at the Department of Justice. That law provides that the Deputy Attorney General should become the acting AG when a vacancy in that office arises. As such, Michaels said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein is the rightful acting AG, not Whitaker.
Michaels also raised a constitutional issue, arguing that the appointments clause requires Senate confirmation for all principal officers of the government, even those serving in an acting capacity. Whitaker was chief of staff to former Attorney General Jeff Sessions prior to his appointment, which is not a Senate-confirmable position.
The justices rejected that motion in a brief order Monday morning. As is typical of such matters, the order was unsigned and no explanation was provided. more
Wait, whaaa…hold on, let me get my glasses. Nobody told me about this. Of course we will hear that challaaaaachk arrrrgh
Now make Whitaker permanent AG. He has the right enemies. Forget Barr. He has all the wrong friends.
Good news! Whitaker can do the job he was appointed to do now.
Enough, already.
DROP THAT FUCKING HAMMER!!!!!
Now!