When asked to explain her defense of Bill Clinton in 1998, Nancy Pelosi wove a quilt of idiotic explanations.
In 1998 she said to the late Tim Russert that women were responding to people’s “right to privacy,” implying that Clinton had the right to cheat on the first lady in the oval office with an intern without our meddling.
She also said that it was a response to special prosecutor Ken Starr having “unlimited time, power and money,” implying that the investigation unfairly strayed from the initial reason for the investigation, Whitewater, to areas involving sexual misconduct.
Ken Mueller is unavailable for comment. He is currently combing through Ivanka Trump’s hamper.
Asked to comment on her position in 1998 and square it with the current climate where politicians are being accused of sexual misconduct daily, much to the approval of feminists, Pelosi muttered something about the difference being that Clinton was being impeached for something that had nothing to do with the performance of his duties.
???
Was the performance of his duties to tamper with grand jury witnesses, obstruct justice and lie under oath and send surrogates out on the morning shows to say this was all a vast right-wing conspiracy?
That’s a lot of energy being expended that has nothing to do with preserving the domestic tranquility, all because he was obsessed with getting laid.
Chuck Todd asks Pelosi if she agrees that the left exacerbated the problem of sexual harassment towards women because of how Clinton was given a pass on being a sexual predator.
Pelosi murmurs something incoherent and then says, “no, the election of president Trump evoked a response” in women, and that is why we are seeing all of these sexual misconduct allegations.”
Does this theory add up when you consider that the sexual predator, Bill Clinton, was at every wolf whistle stop with Hillary during the campaign, where feminists whooped and cheered for the grandpapa of all pants droppers?
The left is entertaining, I’ll grant them that, when they try and explain away their questionable scruples.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-trump-effect-immigration-police/police-in-trump-supporting-towns-aid-immigration-officials-in-crackdown-idUSKBN1DR169?il=0
Woman: “I was groped and sexually harassed by a politician.”
Democrat: “Oh… You poor dear. Tell me all about what that evil Republican monster did to you.”
Woman: “He was a democrat.”
Democrat: “Oh… Well fuck off then you lying slut!!!… Bet you were asking for it!… Who put you up to telling these lies?!… Was it Putin?!!!…”
Senator Franken, RESIGN.
Representative Conyers, RESIGN.
How ’bout that “Culture of Corruption” Nancy… quite a swamp you’ve built thar, huh??
They always knew about the behavior, they just assumed they’d be given the usual pass. They never expected the dam to break.
“… Clinton was being impeached for something that had nothing to do with the performance of his duties.” So, lying under oath had nothing to do with the job? And having an extramarital affair would cost you your Security Clearance in the service ( the secret left you open to blackmail by America’s enemies), but that was OK for the Commander in Chief?
The things I would enjoy with Piglosi and a football bat. 🙂