43 Comments on The SAT question everyone got wrong
Oh, you know…the thing. And that’s the answer, fat.
6
WITH NO NET BELOW ME, I SAY IT’S A MATTER OF THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF EACH WHICH IS 2 PIE RADIUS, THEN, BY DIVISION, SEEING HOW MANY REVOLUTIONS OF THE SMALLER CIRCLE = ONE FOR THE LARGER
4
^^^^ BUT I REALLY DON’T FUCKING KNOW
I’M A GENIUS BUT ONLY IN MY OWN MIND
7
Ok, that’s some freaky stuff.
It was enjoyable to watch, if you’re so inclined.
2
I can’t tell you how many times I was asked that very question during my career of solving problems as a Division and Department Manager.
As a matter of fact, it was the same number of times I used Algebra as a Manager.
8
I came up with the correct answer, was surprised that it wasn’t in the list of available responses. Although I didn’t consider the alternative ‘revolution’ point, clearly valid but fairly obviously not what the creators were thinking. Of course the creators weren’t thinking…
I took the SAT a year before that. And was on the math team for 3 years, and we won a lot. Didn’t become a jock until college. 🙂
No wonder Apple and Google Maps will lead you off a cliff!
7
LCD, I DESERVE THAT!!
3
OK. I just watched the video and I flunked too.
Oh well. I will never get into Harvard.
4
The location of the observer within the frame of reference is everything.
6
BTW…
Q. What did LeBron James get on his math SAT?
A. BBQ sauce.
24
It’s like the question “How many times does the earth rotate on its axis in a leap year?”
3
ok, here’s where my smartass kicks in & argues w/ the professor …
if Circle A revolves around Circle B, & they are touching, as in the video, then Circle A would wear down 4 times faster than Circle B …. annnnnnnd, because A’s surface area will diminish its diameter at a greater rate than B, being 3 times greater, over time.
I’ve designed many gear drives over my engineering career. I used my engineering training and experience to derive my answer and got it wrong. Once he demonstrated it….DUH!
1
As I recall, I took the SAT in 75…. Scored in the high 1400s. I have always been a good test taker… just dumb as shit.
FJB
5
I took the SAT once in 1980. I can’t recall my score but it was good enough to get into engineering school at UMD. My math score was WAY higher than my English.
7
Famous engineer joke –
Four years ago I couldn’t spell engineer, and now I are one…
13
I think Benito has it right. I said 3 times. then I listened to the math professor. then I cut out a 2 inch circle and a 6 inch circle and then spun it around, 3 times. Math professor must be using common core math, the answer is three.
6
@Bill
That was my approach too. I treated them like gears, both rotating about their centers. Rolling one around the other increases the revolution by 1.
4
Now here’s a real SAT question …
If a chicken and a half can lay an egg and a half in a day and a half, how many grasshoppers does it take to kick the seeds out of a dill pickle?
16
I had a similar problem with my practice COT test. The practice test was an old COT test the union stole from headquarters… and it had some horrific errors in the logic gate section.
You do this massive 49 input gate diagram and it fails out. I did it 3 or 4 times expecting to find my mistake. I never found it. I walked it over to a real COT and he did it 3 or 4 times and said, “It’s hosed”.
That was that. The test was fucked up and fucked up a generation of test applicants.
3
Went to the Trusty Machinist Handbook. Started with reduction pulleys. Answer, 3.
Went to Gear and Hobb cutter section. A solid 4. I haven’t had time to sort out the particulars. Weak question. I’d gone with 1. LOL
3
BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAA! Michigan Technological University Class of 72!
Eat yer heart out boys
3
^^^^^^ What ever Bikini gurl. What’s the right answer or we demand more pics. LOL.
4
A 4-8-8-4 Wasatch Big Boy leaves Bombay at 10:31 GMT to cross Botany Bay. At the same time a Ford Pinto in Sieverville New Jersey cracks a block and spills green shit mixed with brown shit everywhere. They both cross the Tacoma Narrows bridge at the same instant.
Who saw the Mothman first?
2
Hey Bad Brad – what do you call a boomerang that doesn’t come back? a stick
Luv ya!
5
Zonga
LOL. I can’t wait to meet you at the IOTW Christmas party.
4
conference of the big circle is (6)(r)(pi)
Circumference of the small circle is (2)(r)(pi)
Divide the big circumference by the small circumference and you get three times
3
B) 3
No, didn’t look…for this straight 3:1 ratio you can surmise, but 2(pi)r to calculate circumference, then divide Circ.B by Circ.A (18.84/6.28= 3).
1
Yes, but that only works as a general rule of thumb as it relates to the answers given (only had 30 minutes so fiddling around with it for too long would jeopardize time). But my answer above is wrong as I did not include the circumference of ‘A’ added to ‘B’ but 4 is not a given answer…so 3 must be “close enough”. (the video shows this well).
I recall this question, and thought ‘1’ as A only went around B once…but ‘1’ was not a choice, so picked ‘3’ trying to guess what test makers wanted. The question was actually stupid, proving nothing while adding confusion to test takers. Nowadays CAD programs handle these gear ratio type problems easily with no mistakes.
The answer to everything is 42.
12
3
2
If I had a job I had to do serious math every day…
I failed algebra III. Trig. I was thinking about other shit at the time.
I fuck up cups, and ounces, quarts, quartz, and milliliters.
2
pie are round, cornbread are square
5
The correct answer is racism.
6
I traced my finger around several times and guessed right!
2
I’ve ignored science ever since it concluded men can have babies and I’m nuts for thinking otherwise.
4
That is a misleading headline. When taking a nationally standardized multiple-guess test, no one expects the Spanish Inquisition, errr, no correct answers, including no “none of the above” answer.
Paradox
Learned something watching the vid. Loved the math prof.
1
You’re a racist, ….no joke
O times, the small circle was an EV and the charger was broken…
Oh, you know…the thing. And that’s the answer, fat.
WITH NO NET BELOW ME, I SAY IT’S A MATTER OF THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF EACH WHICH IS 2 PIE RADIUS, THEN, BY DIVISION, SEEING HOW MANY REVOLUTIONS OF THE SMALLER CIRCLE = ONE FOR THE LARGER
^^^^ BUT I REALLY DON’T FUCKING KNOW
I’M A GENIUS BUT ONLY IN MY OWN MIND
Ok, that’s some freaky stuff.
It was enjoyable to watch, if you’re so inclined.
I can’t tell you how many times I was asked that very question during my career of solving problems as a Division and Department Manager.
As a matter of fact, it was the same number of times I used Algebra as a Manager.
I came up with the correct answer, was surprised that it wasn’t in the list of available responses. Although I didn’t consider the alternative ‘revolution’ point, clearly valid but fairly obviously not what the creators were thinking. Of course the creators weren’t thinking…
I took the SAT a year before that. And was on the math team for 3 years, and we won a lot. Didn’t become a jock until college. 🙂
Just my gut says 3. But I don’t know for sure.
@BENITO – https://youtu.be/CZstgDZoLkA?si=wVpAr3NrYkGSFgZ_&t=13 🙂
No wonder Apple and Google Maps will lead you off a cliff!
LCD, I DESERVE THAT!!
OK. I just watched the video and I flunked too.
Oh well. I will never get into Harvard.
The location of the observer within the frame of reference is everything.
BTW…
Q. What did LeBron James get on his math SAT?
A. BBQ sauce.
It’s like the question “How many times does the earth rotate on its axis in a leap year?”
ok, here’s where my smartass kicks in & argues w/ the professor …
if Circle A revolves around Circle B, & they are touching, as in the video, then Circle A would wear down 4 times faster than Circle B …. annnnnnnd, because A’s surface area will diminish its diameter at a greater rate than B, being 3 times greater, over time.
revolution #! – 4.0
revolution #2 – 3.900000000000000000000000000000000000000000009
revolution #3 – 3.900000000000000000000000000000000000000000008
(crude example)
“entropy; know wut I mean, Vern?”
… yeah, I’m a jerk
I’ve designed many gear drives over my engineering career. I used my engineering training and experience to derive my answer and got it wrong. Once he demonstrated it….DUH!
As I recall, I took the SAT in 75…. Scored in the high 1400s. I have always been a good test taker… just dumb as shit.
FJB
I took the SAT once in 1980. I can’t recall my score but it was good enough to get into engineering school at UMD. My math score was WAY higher than my English.
Famous engineer joke –
Four years ago I couldn’t spell engineer, and now I are one…
I think Benito has it right. I said 3 times. then I listened to the math professor. then I cut out a 2 inch circle and a 6 inch circle and then spun it around, 3 times. Math professor must be using common core math, the answer is three.
@Bill
That was my approach too. I treated them like gears, both rotating about their centers. Rolling one around the other increases the revolution by 1.
Now here’s a real SAT question …
If a chicken and a half can lay an egg and a half in a day and a half, how many grasshoppers does it take to kick the seeds out of a dill pickle?
I had a similar problem with my practice COT test. The practice test was an old COT test the union stole from headquarters… and it had some horrific errors in the logic gate section.
You do this massive 49 input gate diagram and it fails out. I did it 3 or 4 times expecting to find my mistake. I never found it. I walked it over to a real COT and he did it 3 or 4 times and said, “It’s hosed”.
That was that. The test was fucked up and fucked up a generation of test applicants.
Went to the Trusty Machinist Handbook. Started with reduction pulleys. Answer, 3.
Went to Gear and Hobb cutter section. A solid 4. I haven’t had time to sort out the particulars. Weak question. I’d gone with 1. LOL
BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAA! Michigan Technological University Class of 72!
Eat yer heart out boys
^^^^^^ What ever Bikini gurl. What’s the right answer or we demand more pics. LOL.
A 4-8-8-4 Wasatch Big Boy leaves Bombay at 10:31 GMT to cross Botany Bay. At the same time a Ford Pinto in Sieverville New Jersey cracks a block and spills green shit mixed with brown shit everywhere. They both cross the Tacoma Narrows bridge at the same instant.
Who saw the Mothman first?
Hey Bad Brad – what do you call a boomerang that doesn’t come back? a stick
Luv ya!
Zonga
LOL. I can’t wait to meet you at the IOTW Christmas party.
conference of the big circle is (6)(r)(pi)
Circumference of the small circle is (2)(r)(pi)
Divide the big circumference by the small circumference and you get three times
B) 3
No, didn’t look…for this straight 3:1 ratio you can surmise, but 2(pi)r to calculate circumference, then divide Circ.B by Circ.A (18.84/6.28= 3).
Yes, but that only works as a general rule of thumb as it relates to the answers given (only had 30 minutes so fiddling around with it for too long would jeopardize time). But my answer above is wrong as I did not include the circumference of ‘A’ added to ‘B’ but 4 is not a given answer…so 3 must be “close enough”. (the video shows this well).
I recall this question, and thought ‘1’ as A only went around B once…but ‘1’ was not a choice, so picked ‘3’ trying to guess what test makers wanted. The question was actually stupid, proving nothing while adding confusion to test takers. Nowadays CAD programs handle these gear ratio type problems easily with no mistakes.
The answer to everything is 42.
3
If I had a job I had to do serious math every day…
I failed algebra III. Trig. I was thinking about other shit at the time.
I fuck up cups, and ounces, quarts, quartz, and milliliters.
pie are round, cornbread are square
The correct answer is racism.
I traced my finger around several times and guessed right!
I’ve ignored science ever since it concluded men can have babies and I’m nuts for thinking otherwise.
That is a misleading headline. When taking a nationally standardized multiple-guess test, no one expects the Spanish Inquisition, errr, no correct answers, including no “none of the above” answer.
Paradox
Learned something watching the vid. Loved the math prof.
You’re a racist, ….no joke
O times, the small circle was an EV and the charger was broken…