There is a movement afoot to circumvent the electoral college – IOTW Report

There is a movement afoot to circumvent the electoral college

Connecticut state Senate passes bill giving electoral votes to presidential candidate who wins popular vote.

The Hill– The Connecticut state Senate on Saturday voted in favor of a measure to give the state’s electoral votes to the presidential candidate who wins the popular vote.

The move puts the state in a position to become the 11th, in addition to Washington, D.C., to join an interstate compact to pool their Electoral College votes for the candidate who wins the popular vote.

The state Senate voted 21-14 in favor of the bill, with the support of three GOP lawmakers, The Guardian reported. The measure passed the state House on a 77-73 vote last month. Democratic Gov. Dannel Malloy is expected to sign the legislation, according to the report.

President Trump won the Electoral College, but Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes.

more

21 Comments on There is a movement afoot to circumvent the electoral college

  1. Clinton: Will you respect the results of the election?

    Trump: Maybe.

    Clinton proceeds to spend $$ to run up the popular vote, while forgetting about the electoral college.

    Trump only spends $, (because who gives a greasy crap about the popular vote,) while earning an electoral college victory.

    Go ahead. Change the rules. Trump will spend $$$ and win BOTH the popular vote AND the electoral college.

    What,
    Ever

    8
  2. Good luck with what?
    The bill will pass in Connecticut.
    If Pennsylvania and Ohio had this law in place in 2016, Hillary is our president.

    What the left wants is to have California and New York decide the presidency.

    29
  3. BFH
    Wait, this is defined under the Constitution. Right? The electoral college is defined in the 12th. Our problem is, we need a God Damn AG. Did someone blackmail this asshole or what? Bottom line, if any communist state pulls this shit, we’re going to court. I’m losing faith in Q fast, but damn I hope I’m wrong.

    8
  4. So, Connecticut “voters” want to just hand “their” ballots to Chicago “counters”? And, here, I thought women who voted however their men told them to, were stupid. (But still smart enough to actually vote.)

    6
  5. Brad, I sometimes question my judgement on Q also. But other than Trump, what else do we have as far as communicating the means and the objective? I’m sticking with him for now. You know, if it wasn’t for the perception that Sessions is falling on his face we would be pretty pleased with things. If only that damn Sessions would give us an indication that he isn’t sleepwalking.

    3
  6. The problem is that possibility of circumvention of the electoral college was written into the Constitution (deliberately in my opinion). State legislatures choose the electors but the Constitution is silent on the method of their choosing. Likewise, the Constitution is silent on whether state legislatures may dictate the votes to be cast by their electors.

    Article II
    Section 1
    1: The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows

    2: (as modified by the 12th Amendment) Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

    The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;—The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;—The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President

    6
  7. Trump is a Band-Aid. A surprisingly good one. But a Band-Aid can’t help with cancer. The Left is, by design, a terminal cancer, far too metastasized in our national system that it can’t not kill us in the end.

    If this idea flies, other leftist states will do it before 2020 (“state’s rights!” they’ll scream) and then it’s game over. If not in 2020, 2024 for sure.

    Let’s be honest, something like that scenario is pretty much a given. It can’t be avoided because there is no reconciliation possible with Communism. Either it dies or we do.

    The only issue worth discussing is what we can do about it once it happens.

    12
  8. So if I were still a voter in CT and I and the majority in the state cast our ballots for the candidate that did not win the national majority, our votes would be ignored. This measure disenfranchises the voters of the state, wouldn’t that at least violate the state constitution not to mention the Constitution?

    5
  9. When you have subversive actors infesting the government from top top bottom and very strong measures aren’t taken to root them out it becomes a question of time before we are through as a republic.
    We are going after them using adherence to the law and they respect no restrictions on behavior. It’s hard to see how we win peacefully. They are very close to getting their way.

    5
  10. Ultimately it is CT after all. It’s deep blue, so this willing forfeiture of state sovereignty wouldn’t have changed the outcome of 2016.

    Question is, if CT votes blue in 2020, but Trump wins the popular vote, will they stick with their silly law? Doubtful.

    Any state who elects phony soldier Blumenthal and Rosa DiLauro is already lost.

    4

Comments are closed.