Was Assange’s Internet Access Pulled Because…. (Drumroll) – IOTW Report

Was Assange’s Internet Access Pulled Because…. (Drumroll)

Tuesday, 18 October 2016, 18:11 BFH Uncategorized 16

The oldest trick in the book.
In short, a Canadian family vacationing in the Bahamas walked into a police station and told them their 8 year-old daughter was “sexually molested online” by Julian Assange.
Assange purportedly sent picture and videos of his junk to her.
They were in contact with each other through a dating site called ToddandClare.com.
She allegedly accessed the site through her 22 year-old sister’s account.
The father says he’s identified Julian Assange as the man in the images.

“We understand Julian Assange was clearly photo- and video- identified in the chatlogs by both the parents of the juvenile, [and the] Social Services worked involved…

“We understand the family reported to the Bahamas authorities that Mr Assange sent the 8-year-old juvenile (i) unlawful, indecent images and video media of himself performing lewd sex acts on a mobile camera device, and (ii) unlawful obscenity materials of a child pornographic nature.”

The final clause notwithstanding, it’s not clear as yet whether he knew he was interacting with an 8-year-old or thought it was the 22-year-old account holder.

The following goes deeper into the weeds. Reddit users are already calling BS, saying that the site is a shell and bogus.

One user says they’ve identified the owners of the site as huge Clinton supporters.

We are SEEING IT ALL this season, folks.

5.
On June 8, 2016, ToddandClare.com was contacted by a representative of
Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange, stating that due to MIT Professor Noam
Chomsky’s support in the KATIA Project, Mr Assange was interested in becoming a
#HeForShe Ambassador for KATIA. Mr Assange’s approach message (conveyed on
his behalf by his attorneys at a Stockholm-based law firm, Advokatfirman
Samuelson, Schönmeyr & Wall HB) discussed Mr Assange offering his name to
spread awareness for KATIA pro bono, to help protect women. Mr Assange claimed
he was a “feminist” wanting to help “rape victims in the UK and Scandinavia reach
equitable treatment before the law.”
6.
Per Samuelson, Mr Assange’s attorney, who attested to the validity of the
situation, acted as a relay for messages between his client and ToddandClare.com,
ahead of subsequent phone calls and two video conferences.
7.
In return for Mr Assange’s celebrity to spread the KATIA Project beyond
its YouTube PSA, performed by 33 women, (“Rape Culture by Ellie
#StandwithKATIA”:
Mr
Assange would receive the moral support of a “second United Nations-affiliate.
TERMINATION OF CONTRACT
14. Following the legal disclosures (below) regarding the Royal Bahamas
Police Force criminal investigation into child sex offenses relating to Julian Assange
and the family of a female user on our site, all contractual agreements with Mr
Assange were terminated with immediate effect on September 28, 2016.
15. After September 28, 2016, Mr Assange’s Swedish representative, Mr
Samuelson, and Mr Assange, refused to engage in any phone or email discussions
regarding our prior arrangement.
16. On October 3, 2016, ToddandClare.com began legal action in the UK
courts against Mr Assange for breach of contract, principally to prevent Mr Assange
from ever using our United Nations status or association in his criminal case.
On Wednesday, September 28, 2016, ToddandClare.com’s Trust & Safety
team was contacted by the father of an 8-year-old juvenile regarding a criminal
investigation by the Royal Bahamas Police Force that contexts serious child sex
offenses against the man’s young daughter. The juvenile is the younger sister of a
22-year-old adult female ToddandClare.com user.
3.
Our understanding is that the RBPF Investigation (RBPF Reference: Sgt
Ferguson 1705 RBPF Thompson Boulevard) is being handled by a specialist child
protection unit of the Bahamas police authorities and relates to the child exploitation
of an 8-year-old juvenile in Nassau, Bahamas using electronic/internet methods;
prohibited use of an electronic communication system to procure a minor; child
pornography production; and the luring of a minor online for sex, by Mr Julian
Assange, who we understand has been identified from chatlogs.
4.
We understand the family involved are Canadian nationals, who were on
a month long yachting vacation through the Bahamas, and residing as guests of Mrs.
Mavis Darling-Hill, at the Darling-Hill’s poolside residence in the Blair Estates area
of Nassau, New Providence.
5.
The investigation specifically pertains to Mr Assange’s remote use of our
dating site, ToddandClare.com
6.
We understand the father was advised to contact Sgt Darrington Sands at
the local Fox Hill police station. We understand initial contact with law enforcement
was subsequently made with Sgt Symonatt for the Blair Estates area, at 10am, on
September 28, 2016, in which the father reported the pedophile crimes against his 8-
year-old daughter.
7.
We understand the Fox Hill duty officer subsequently transferred the
family to urgently contact the Central Detective Unit of the Royal Bahamas Police
Force on Thompson Boulevard in Nassau.
8.
We understand the family proceeded to make a formal complaint to
Sergeant Ferguson at Thompson Boulevard on Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at
12.40pm, that their 8-year-old juvenile daughter was sexually molested online by
Julian Assange, through ToddandClare.com, and that Assange had been accessing
the site from London, UK.
9.
We understand Julian Assange was clearly photo- and video- identified in
the chatlogs by both the parents of the juvenile, and Mrs Darling-Hill, who is the
Bahamas Social Services worker involved.
10. We understand the chatlogs evidenced the 8-year-old juvenile was
unlawfully made the subject of “internet grooming” by Mr Assange, which included
propositioning the 8-year-old juvenile “to perform oral and anal sex acts”.
11. We understand the family reported to the Bahamas authorities that Mr
Assange sent the 8-year-old juvenile (i) unlawful, indecent images and video media
of himself performing lewd acts on a mobile camera device, and (ii) unlawful
obscenity materials of a child pornographic nature.
12. Neither the 22 year old female nor the 8-year old juvenile had physically
met offline with Mr Assange at any time.
13. The family has no connection to Sweden, the UK, or the United States,
and no connection with Julian Assange whatsoever. The family has made clear, at
this extraordinarily sensitive time, their only priority is their 8-year-old’s wellbeing.
14. These Royal Bahamas Police Force circumstances led to the immediate
termination of the agreement between ToddandClare.com and Julian Assange, and
forthwith, cancellation of all plans to film a video production for the KATIA Project
with Mr Assange, who both we and the KATIA Project have completely
disassociated from.
15. No other users of ToddandClare.com are involved.
Reddit User  ismyroofright — EDIT: Lol, I signed up at toddandclare.com and was user number 600 something. All the “profiles” of women feature one image only, just like on every scam dating site. I just “sent” a text message and was never asked to pay. They can’t even set up a functional fake backstory correctly.

rottenmedia  – I read up on this. Dig a little deeper and you will find the owners of the site are connected to the Clintons.

And, isnt it funny how the globalists ALWAYS try to take people down with sex scandals? False accusations against Trump. This obvious smear against Assange. Remember that old IMF guy they said tried to rape a maid?

 

 

16 Comments on Was Assange’s Internet Access Pulled Because…. (Drumroll)

  1. I think I am safe in my assumption that this is totally bogus. Whatever else you think of Assange, he is quite intelligent. I know he’s been holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London and presumably without female companionship, but he knows how this stuff works and I don’t see him falling for it.

    There are some people in this world who need killin’, and I don’t think Assange is one of them.

  2. THE DEMONRATS AND protards of Hillary are getting deeper in the weeds with every attempted discredit by made up charges and are making themselves the bigger jackaSSes in the barnyard hour by hour by hour. Keep it up. Even the head-in-the-sand dimwits following them will start to scratch their asses and wonder whats going on? its a Deluge of lies spun by the Clintons, for the Clintons, and against anyone Non-clinton. Taping a sign on their backsides saying “Queen’s Fool” could not be more obvious for the world to see.

  3. I ASK ONCE AGAIN,is it to soon to for pitchforks, torches and storming the castle?
    ..
    …… remember the villagers succeed in bringing burning it down. (Creature survival is just a plot device)

  5. What Southwesterner said.

    Trump’s woman troubles seem almost quaint now, what with Huma’s sexting pedo hubby, Hillary’s secret lesbian rendezvous, and raper Bill’s Pedo Island excursions.

    No wonder they’re frantically trying to spread the word that independents are breaking for Hillary now. If that’s the case, why have independents been undersampled in most polls for weeks now? Buckle up, y’all.

  7. Wait a minute! I recognize that junk! That’s Carlos Danger’s naughty bits.

    It’s OK, though. Canadians think everyone south of The Great Lakes look alike. I’m sure it’s just an honest mistake.

  11. If it proves out that this is fake (and it sounds like it may well be) and that the Canadians are participants and not dupes then the Bahamian police need to charge them and disregard any interference that would probably come from our Department of External Affairs.

  12. “One user says they’ve identified the owners of the site as huge Clinton supporters.”

    Not just the run of the mill Clinton supporters. Larry Summers of The Center for American Progress is listed with the front corporation behind the bogus dating site and the $1,000,000 Russian payout bullshit. Assange has got Soros after him, too. This is making Watergate and Deep Throat look like child’s play. “All The Presidential Candidates Men”. (oh dam, clintonizing a movie again)

  14. Must have been some clever cut-and-splice-and-insert, with no background showing, to pull this off. Yet, digital being what it is, there will be “fingerprints” to tell original from splice. And, in the end (pun not deliberate), truth will out, and rather quickly. And all the “gatekeepers” (ABCNBCCBSMSNBCCNNFaux et al) won’t be able to cover up and/or hide the truth.

Comments are closed.

iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.