As long as we are on the subject of whether there is such an animal as an “Obama judge,” let us consider the judges who sit on the FISA court and issue warrants allowing surveillance of American citizens who are suspected foreign agents, essentially taking the uncontested word of the government.
Their actions on behalf of one political campaign, colluding with a corrupt DOJ and FBI to target a political opponent, are not supposed to happen in a country based on the rule of law as administered by supposedly impartial judges. Empowered to safeguard our national security against foreign actors, they essentially served as an extra-constitutional arm of the Hillary Clinton campaign as it colluded with foreign actors to stage a Deep-State coup against a duly elected president, Donald J. Trump? Aiding and abetting the legacy of Barack Obama seems like something an “Obama judge” would do.
Chief Justice Roberts is the one who gets to appoint judges to the FISA court – every last one of them, judges like Rudolph Contreras, who granted a previously denied Michael Flynn FISA warrant. His appointees are the ones who swallowed whole the contentions of the Obama administration using unverified material put together by a British agent and his Russian sources to aid one political party at the expense of another.
The FISA court and its star chamber judges make for a borderline example of the prophetic warning about trading a little liberty for a little security and winding up with neither. The potential abuse of FISA powers is enormous, and the damage that has been done to our republic and our politics has been staggering.
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court deals with some of the most sensitive matters of national security – terror threats and espionage. Its work for the most part cannot be examined by the American public, by order of the Congress and the President. It is a tribunal that is completely secret (or supposed to be), its structure largely one-sided, and its members unilaterally chosen by one person.
A rotating panel of federal judges at the FISC decides whether to grant certain types of government requests – wiretapping, data analysis, and other monitoring for “foreign intelligence purposes” of suspected terrorists and spies operating in the United States.
… [T]he 11 judges are appointed exclusively by the Chief Justice of the United States, without any supplemental confirmation from the other two branches of government. John Roberts has named every member of the current court, as a well as a separate three-judge panel to hear appeals of FISC orders, known as the Court of Review.
So how could a court over which Chief Justice John Roberts has complete control allow frauds to be committed upon it in a manner more fitting in a banana republic?
h/t Really Enraged.
Maybe we should call them NWO judges or treasonous judges.
I want to contact them cause
I can make my fortune selling
them worn out bridges.
GWB was the most immoral President in 45 years! Roberts is only 1 example! More: Mueller, Comey ….!
The man bereft of morals looked me in the eye and told “The biggest lie in American history!” , “Im a compassionate conservative”. Not a conservative as Obama! Goldwater clearly was a liberal if GWB was “conservative”!
The swamp has countless traitors sabotaging our constitution.
A lot of woke on Roberts lately. I bet he now wishes he had kept his yapper shut.
#MAGA
Yeah, I already knew all of this about the FISA warrants. What I wonder is why is no one in jail for this already?
Judges are supposed to be honest, intelligent, fair, and open minded.
For Justice Roberts to make these idiotic bullshit statements, at least one of the above doesn’t fit.
Most likely all four, the rat bastard.
BTW, I won’t call him CHIEF Justice since all judges are the same, right?