Publish no name but humiliate them ie. a Democrat, pervert etc then
Publicly shoot them in the face with a 22 short until they can be pronounced dead. Expect a few morons to seek this treatment but when this particular insanity is exhausted mass shootings will decrease.
Some leftist moron just criticized people carrying guns in church:
“Have we really reached a point when each of us need to carry a firearm anywhere we go? Gun advocates certainly think so.”
The answer, asshole, is a resounding YES, thanks to leftist power-grabbing/pandering policies.
26
Just kill them, and figure it out later.
8
As they say in Texas, some folks simply need killin’.
Mass shooters are at the top of my “some folks” list.
While I’d rather not do the killin’ myself because of all the downstream hassles, I’d have no moral qualms or psychological aversion about doing so.
20
We can ask that question, but we can’t allow the answer.
A “separation of … ” sort of thing.
A friend told me this AM that he had heard some jouranalist indignantly say about the man who shot the would be killer in the TX church this week, “He might have hit an innocent person by mistake!”…
Don’t know if that is true but it sounds right…
6
“would be killer”
Hardly.
8
Kids say the darndest things.
Unlike Politicians, kids are always more right than wrong.
5
The church shooter in Texas last week was permanently rehabilitated on the spot, at no cost to Texas taxpayers.
You are Welcome.
27
The only good liberal is a dead liberal.
5
It’s possible an innocent person could have been hurt by defender. However, it’s guarandamteed that if killer had not been stopped many more people would have been killed.
17
Don’t like guns? Don’t carry one. Seems pretty fuckin’ simple. If fact, if you aren’t comfortable around firearms, I don’t WANT you to carry one. Leave it me and go back to sucking your thumb in mute terror.
14
While the hero was obviously well-trained, I was somewhat less impressed with some of the other volunteer “security” staff who showed up AFTER the shooting stopped; their muzzle control left something to be desired. Maybe stress? Maybe more training needed?
3
Guns work better than gun control
16
I hate to be critical, but… they were suspicious of the shooter when he walked in. Thats when you get in close and ENGAGE verbally then physically before he can pull a firearm. Those two gentlemen did not have to die if someone had just had the balls to confront this turd face-to-face.
4
2A4ever
One guy did. Standing 5 feet away or less. He decided to reach for his weapon. That got him killed. Should have gone hand to hand. That 21 foot rule works both ways. Had he grabbed the bad guys shot gun odds are nobody would have died.
6
Shoot back. 😡
4
We don’t need Gun Control, what we need is DEMOCRAT CONTROL!
Works for me…
ONE THING!
Remove all “Gun Free Zones” to legal and lawful gun owners.
Frank Proctor agrees.
https://youtu.be/v2R_2J3UzwU
Publish no name but humiliate them ie. a Democrat, pervert etc then
Publicly shoot them in the face with a 22 short until they can be pronounced dead. Expect a few morons to seek this treatment but when this particular insanity is exhausted mass shootings will decrease.
Shane vs Jack Wilson
Just sayen
https://youtu.be/2D-JL0ARJ7I
An armed society is a polite society.
Some leftist moron just criticized people carrying guns in church:
“Have we really reached a point when each of us need to carry a firearm anywhere we go? Gun advocates certainly think so.”
The answer, asshole, is a resounding YES, thanks to leftist power-grabbing/pandering policies.
Just kill them, and figure it out later.
As they say in Texas, some folks simply need killin’.
Mass shooters are at the top of my “some folks” list.
While I’d rather not do the killin’ myself because of all the downstream hassles, I’d have no moral qualms or psychological aversion about doing so.
We can ask that question, but we can’t allow the answer.
A “separation of … ” sort of thing.
A friend told me this AM that he had heard some jouranalist indignantly say about the man who shot the would be killer in the TX church this week, “He might have hit an innocent person by mistake!”…
Don’t know if that is true but it sounds right…
“would be killer”
Hardly.
Kids say the darndest things.
Unlike Politicians, kids are always more right than wrong.
The church shooter in Texas last week was permanently rehabilitated on the spot, at no cost to Texas taxpayers.
You are Welcome.
The only good liberal is a dead liberal.
It’s possible an innocent person could have been hurt by defender. However, it’s guarandamteed that if killer had not been stopped many more people would have been killed.
Don’t like guns? Don’t carry one. Seems pretty fuckin’ simple. If fact, if you aren’t comfortable around firearms, I don’t WANT you to carry one. Leave it me and go back to sucking your thumb in mute terror.
While the hero was obviously well-trained, I was somewhat less impressed with some of the other volunteer “security” staff who showed up AFTER the shooting stopped; their muzzle control left something to be desired. Maybe stress? Maybe more training needed?
Guns work better than gun control
I hate to be critical, but… they were suspicious of the shooter when he walked in. Thats when you get in close and ENGAGE verbally then physically before he can pull a firearm. Those two gentlemen did not have to die if someone had just had the balls to confront this turd face-to-face.
2A4ever
One guy did. Standing 5 feet away or less. He decided to reach for his weapon. That got him killed. Should have gone hand to hand. That 21 foot rule works both ways. Had he grabbed the bad guys shot gun odds are nobody would have died.
Shoot back. 😡
We don’t need Gun Control, what we need is DEMOCRAT CONTROL!