Time
A lawyer for the whistleblower who raised alarms about President Donald Trump’s dealings with Ukraine said Sunday his client is willing to answer written questions submitted by House Republicans.
The surprise offer, made to Rep. Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, would allow Republicans to ask questions of the whistleblower, who spurred the Democratic-led impeachment inquiry, without having to go through the committee’s chairman, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. More
Hey ERIC CIARAMELLA! You can’t hide behind a pen and paper pal.
He’s not the President of the United States… he should have to FACE Congress aka.. THE AMERICAN People. HE made the accusations… time to put up or shut up!
Subpoena these lawyers to physically produce this treasonous individual for live questioning at a public hearing by all members of the committee (no Shitty Schiff question shutdowns from Republicans), or be locked up until they do. This is the same principle as when journalists were locked up until they revealed their sources.
There is no “whistleblower”.
There is only a CIA/Obama-administration/lawfare-Schiff-colluding lackey who (if necessary) agreed to put his name on a conspiratorial document intended to create fake outrage and a “Well, that’s the last straw” impeachment pretext.
Hey ‘whistleblower;” blow THIS.
Who listens to these malignant idiots anymore? Pass them by.
Are House Democrats OK with allowing President Trump’s witnesses answer written questions?
The point is having the ability to cross examine.
UHHHHH NO WAY Jose. its time to nut up or shut up. You CANNOT HIDE FOREVER. If actually believe in what you wrote be a MAN and walk int and stand behind your statement. You are going to HAVE TO testify publicly if it goes to trial in nthe senate.
Oh so this cocksucker gets to set the terms?
@Cate November 3, 2019 at 4:25 pm
> have to FACE Congress aka.. THE AMERICAN People
I’ve been called a lot of things, in these parts. A lot. But that’s… just… that’s… You know what? I don’t wanna’ be drunk posting with that other Anonymi. But that’s… really… mean.
Fuck you pajama boy. You can answer to a federal grand jury, motherfucker.
Nope.
How about they just admit there is no credible whistle blower and end this impeachment hoax now.
Who, what a invisible, faceless, manifestation wants to take out a sitting president?? No, that’s not how it works, deep state and pals. You’ve already crossed the line a few too many times. Call to arms will be our answer…
If the answers aren’t done under oath they’re worthless.
Checkout this tweet from Shitty boy.
There is no Whistle Blower.
Maybe they’ll set it up like a Carnac act where the Whistleblower gives the answers and we guess the questions…
The Answer: Gin, King Tut and Joe Biden
The Question: Name a rummy, a mummy and a dummy.
The Answer: A homer and a triple, Romney and Dolly Parton.
The Question: Name two big hits, a big Mitt and a country-western star!
Unacceptable. No way to prove authorship. Only in-person testimony under oath should be required.
“…the accused shall …be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor,..”
It’s almost like it’s written in stone, or something.
The irony – and crime – I see is Schiff & co. are obstructing the truth from coming out with all their shenanigans.
Good is evil, and evil is good
Isa 5:20