Julie Kelly
The January 6 narrative continues to crumble amid near-daily revelations related to, among other things, the shady circumstances surrounding the Jan 6 “pipe bomber,” the corruption of the January 6 Select Committee, and evidence directly contradicting the carefully fabricated storyline including who was responsible for delaying the deployment of National Guardsmen that afternoon. (Hint: Not Donald Trump.)
A few news and opinion outlets, however, remain stubbornly loyal to the regime-established Jan 6 propaganda mill. After years of investing ink and clicks to promote the most outlandish and in some instances debunked angles of the so-called “insurrection,” these outlets refuse to entertain the idea, now being considered by millions of Americans, that maybe they were snookered into believing one of the most destructive political hoaxes in U.S. history. more here
With apologies to Mr. Ed: “A hoax is a hoax. They’ll coax, they’ll coax.”.
Having read the WSJ for 30 years now, I never thought they were a “conservative” newspaper. They covered politics through the lens of business and how those policies would affect the economy.
But they suffer (as do all big city newspapers) from two distinct maladies; If they don’t like the guy in charge, they will skew coverage with those biases in mind, more likely to paint actions in a more flattering light if they like you, or in a more sinister nefarious light if not. And they do not understand “populism”. They come from a position of elitism where they mistakenly think it is their job to educate the folks, to shape public opinion because their frame of reference is more correct, an extension of Noblesse Oblige where those higher in social rank have a responsibility to help those less fortunate. They do this by telling the folks what is good for them, even if they don’t want to hear it.
^^^ They do this by telling the folks what is good for them, even if it isn’t.
“The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.”
― Thomas Jefferson
lying, jive-ass ******* – your time is coming
WSJ was always a swamp/rino newspaper, but with a little better dressing to fool everyone – like just about most Republicans in Congress. The Hill is another rino rag.