Parole hearing: Judith Clark knew people could be killed in Brinks robbery.
Yet, Andrew Cuomhole commuted her sentence. Of course he would because these are leftwing radicals not unlike the same exact asshole leftist radicals we see today in Antifa, Black Lives Matter, Ecoterrorists and the like.
Our president has been accused of saying that NeoNazis are “fine people,” which is a goddamn lie.
Trump: “George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down — excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?”
Reporter: “I do love Thomas Jefferson.”
Trump: “Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
“So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people — and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists — because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
“Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people. But you also had troublemakers, and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets, and with the baseball bats. You had a lot of bad people in the other group.”
Reporter: “Sir, I just didn’t understand what you were saying. You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly? I just don’t understand what you were saying.”
Trump: “No, no. There were people in that rally — and I looked the night before — if you look, there were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. I’m sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day it looked like they had some rough, bad people — neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them.
“But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest, and very legally protest — because, I don’t know if you know, they had a permit. The other group didn’t have a permit. So I only tell you this: There are two sides to a story. I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country — a horrible moment. But there are two sides to the country. ENTIRE exchange HERE
Compare what the president said to the DNC’s support of Antifa-
Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., the deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee, caused a stir on social media Wednesday when he posed with a book promoting the violent “Antifa” movement.
In a post on Twitter, Ellison said that he found the book “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook” at a Minneapolis book shop and said it would “strike fear in the heart of @realDonaldTrump.”
Washington Free Beacon reporter Alex Griswold pointed out that Ellison was endorsing a book “that advocates for violence in the streets”.
However, others on Twitter responded approvingly to Ellison’s post, with one user writing, “ugh why is he not in charge of the dnc.”
So, yes, I am tying this commutation of the Godmother of ignorant white racial radicals to the placating of their progeny today.
LoHud-
Former radical Judith Clark reflected on her involvement in the murderous 1981 Rockland Brinks robbery, acknowledging she knew violence and even death could occur, with her revolutionary zealotry blinding her to the consequences.
In a 98-page transcript of her April parole hearing that led to her release, Clark told three commissioners about her mindset leading up to the robbery and why she refused to take part in her trial on charges of murdering Nyack Police Sgt. Edward O’Grady, Officer Waverly “Chipper” Brown and Brinks guard Peter Paige.
The parole board, voting 2-1 for release, found “there is ample evidence of rehabilitation, remorse and transformation” and that “your release is compatible with the welfare of the overall community.”
Board member William Smith objected to Clark’s parole noting the “excessive violence” of the robbery.
Her release spurred a legal action to overturn her release filed by retired Nyack police Detective Arthur Keenan, wounded during a roadblock search, and Michael Paige, son of the Brinks guard.
When approached in October 1981 to drive a getaway vehicle in the Brinks robbery, Clark said she knew people could get hurt and killed.
“Yes. The idea of it was that the people who were doing the robbery, it was an armed robbery and they were armed, and I was a, you know, a white person who wouldn’t be seen as, as suspicious, because of who was actually doing it. And so, my role didn’t include being armed,” she said.
When Agostini asked Clark whether she was “perfectly OK with an armed robbery taking place,” Clark responded, “Yes,” even knowing people could get hurt.
When asked about why she still got involved and didn’t ask for more details, she said, ” … there was nothing fearless about my stance. My stance was completely cowardly, you know, to not ask the questions that I could have asked, is a cowards way, not a fearless way.”
The robbery crew — led by members of the Black Liberation Army with former 1960s white radicals serving as accessories — had committed more than a dozen similar robberies across the region to finance their plans for a revolution.
!snip!
Sound friggin familiar?
Same mindless dirtbags, different decade.
ht/ Moe Tom
Filthy commie scum! How do they expect to win a war — an actual shooting war — if they get off the couch?
First two words of the article:
“Former radical”
When OJ left prison after 9 years, I guess he was a former kidnaper and armed robber.
She can stay in HIS house. Preferably, in HIS bed. 😡
Amazing what some dumb suburban white mudshark with daddy issues will do for the BBD.
@TheMule July 2, 2019 at 3:42 pm
> Amazing what some…
(oh, behave!)
“Amazing”? Does it really amaze you? Cuz, I’ve got a few elections I’d like to sell you.