I & I
Earlier this year, pollster Scott Rasmussen asked voters a simple question: “Would you rather have your candidate win by cheating or lose by playing fair?”
The answers he got back were, as he put it in a Daily Signal podcast last week, “the most terrifying poll result I’ve ever seen.”
Among all Americans, just 7% said they would want their candidate to win by cheating. As Rasmussen put it, he’d rather see that number lower, but that’s not bad.
But more than a third of the elite 1% he surveyed would condone cheating. And among those who are “politically obsessed” – meaning that they talk about politics every day – that number shot up to 69%. More
This is probably how these scum (or their parents) achieved their wealth – cheating.
This is what sparks revolutions.
“Elites” may not rhyme with treason, but it means “traitor” nonetheless.
You should run that poll with the IOTW readers.
But it does beg the philosophical question; If the other side cheats and you cheat as well to counter their cheating, is it really cheating?
Using this rubric, anything our side does to win in November is fine with me. Id they want to play by prison rules, so be it.
You know the saying, “If you’re cheating, you’re not trying”. At least that’s what the New England Patriots said.
In a street fight there are no rules, just a winner and a lover.
And you don’t want to be the loser.
Dammit, if you’re not cheating. Proof reading is not my strong suit.
When the bullets start flying, they might feel differently. “When you make peaceful revolution impossible, you make violent revolution INEVITABLE.” – JFK
Unfortunately, the ‘elite’ fuckstcks don’t give a shit about anyone else’s opinion.
Hopefully their shortsighteness will end them.
“A man who wouldn’t cheat for a poke don’t want one bad enough.”
(character in a beloved western movie – series?)