A priestess in the cult of The Science™ apologized Friday for an expletive-laced rant against Americans who voted for Donald Trump.
One would think that the editor-in-chief of Scientific American, the supposedly prestigious science publication founded in 1845, would act sober and measured on social media, a way befitting someone who claims to be an arbiter of reason and objectivity — you know, The Science™. No, I guess not. It turns out that Laura Helmuth, the editor-in-chief in question, is as much a partisan as your average MSNBC viewer. more here
Another stupid, leftist Hag.
Still should be fired
Scientific American is not science. Pro-woke, pro-perv, pro-Darwin and anti-God is the Devil’s Work, not science.
No refunds.
She said: “I respect and value people across the political spectrum. These posts, which I have deleted, do not reflect my beliefs; they were a mistaken expression of shock and confusion about the election results.”
A load of BS. Shock and confusion, she says. BS. She’s full of hate and BS.
I grew up with the Scientific American that once was. I’ll never stop being pissed off at what the left did to that stellar publication.
if she is sorry then why did she do it in the first place. hint she’s not sorry. she’s just a coward
In case you need to put a pic to the name.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Helmuth
Another mentally ill moron kills an institution. Science has no emotion. BITCH.
Uncle Al, the same thing happened to National Geographic as well as Popular Science both of which that I read and subscribed to back in the day. As well as Scientific American, American Heritage and a very healthy monthly dose of Mad Magazine.
I looked her up to see what she looks like. I’m guessing she has at least one cat.
She really has a BS degree. Too bad it turned out not to be not about science but about political correctness and Marxist ideology.
Donald Trump hacked her social media accounts and posted those comments to make her look bad. Everyone knows that.
From the wiki article that Brad referenced – “She was formerly the Health and Science editor at The Washington Post.”
Too late to apologize. Besides, very disingenuous. The circulation numbers for Scientific American must so low they’re circling the drain. The only reason for attempting an apology by the Feminist editor.
Godless and Woke. A death knell combo for this eminent discontinued magazine.
I also subscribed to National Review for many years until they shitcanned John Derbyshire for speaking the truth about black Americans. And Christianity Today as well, neither of which I have read or paid any attention to in many years now. I also miss Dilbert since Scott Adams was banished to outer darkness a couple of years ago for speaking the truth about black Americans as well.
https://iotwreport.com/scientific-american-chooses-sides/
https://iotwreport.com/scientific-america-reverses-gears-now-they-say-the-earth-is-getting-cooler/
https://iotwreport.com/scientific-american-article-criticizing-floyd-autopsy-lacks-pathology-or-forensic-expertise/
I also enjoyed Nat Geo, SA, Pop Science, and National Review.
It all went to shit a long time ago. Nat Geo sucked into all the wokey climate bullshit, and National Review fell apart after Buckley died.
The last time I saw a SA was in an aeroplane… and I haven’t been in one of those in about a decade. Sad thing is I can’t remember why I was in an aeroplane a decade ago. I don’t remember going anywhere.
Fuck apologies. Fire ALL the staff.
Who buys magazines anymore? Even Dr. offices don’t have magazines anymore.
stick it up your ass, ******
The last gasp of DEI — hopefully.
SA was once an interesting read. After moving out of the world of science into the corporate world I read it to keep abreast of interesting things scientific. As with a large percentage of “modern” corporate entities, entertainers, sports figures and others who feel compelled to share their own personal ideas or agendas, political correctness or want to be one of the “cool” kids (woke), they all end up alienating half of the people who pay their salaries. To hell with facts, objectivity or professional dignity. Seems a bit infantile. One mark of maturity is the realization that you are not, in fact, the center of the universe.
The filthy, stinking evil left has systematically wrecked every single critical institution in the United States.
– Government
– Agriculture
– Finance
– Schools
– News
– Medicine
– Science
– Family
– Religion
All are severely damaged now thanks to their love of perversion, hedonism, other people’s money, ugly stupid women, weak stupid men, faggots, and low IQ brown people.
I truly believe that if not for all the massive amounts of damage done by the left on a global scale, that mankind would’ve colonized Mars and the Asteroid Belt by now and would be on their way to interstellar colonization. Instead, we’re stuck here working our asses off to pay for low IQ scumbags to raise kids that steal all our stuff and perverts to groom our kids. All these people should’ve been eradicated ages ago.
I had a subscription to Scientific American for YEARS, dropped it after seeing multiple articles expressing woke views toward scientific questions. What’s the point? Politics is a thing, a nasty and fascinating thing, necessary to we humans to avoid constant violence, but it has ZERO place in any science… even grade school baking soda and vinegar fun.
The twat’s non apology and non acceptance of personal responsibility for individual actions just proves I was right these years ago.
Hedonism, mentioned above, may be the worst of all sins. Too many people want all fun all the time and no work and no study or reading to make oneself better educated. The thing exploded in the 1960s and has been a burgeoning problem ever since. The result is people with messed up, drugged out brains living on the streets and begging productive people for a few bucks to help them get through one more miserable day.
The costs of this behavior to America must be billions, if not trillions. Sociologists and statisticians could probably figure out the cost over the past 6 decades with a big grant from the Fed. Gov’t, but I suspect not too many academics really want to do that. Their liberal woke dreams would be ruined.