DC: A former University of Colorado Law School student has alleged that Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch once informed a class full of law students that “many” women try to milk maternity benefits out of their employers and that law firms would be wise to ask prospective female employees if they plan to get pregnant anytime soon.
The two-page letter penned by 2016 University of Colorado Law School graduate Jennifer Sisk was published on Sunday, according to NBC News.
Sisk encountered Gorsuch, President Donald Trump’s nominee to replace Antonin Scalia, when he taught a legal ethics class in the spring of 2016 at the taxpayer-funded school.
In April 2016, Sisk maintains, Gorsuch presented a hypothetical scenario to students concerning a female attorney who “used a company to get maternity benefits and then left right after having a baby,” Sisk’s letter explains.
Watch for Ms. Sisk to now get a mid-six-figure salary at the Clinton Foundation, a left-wing think tank, or MSNBC.
I worked with a woman who managed to get pregnant every other year so that she would be off during the holidays. She had four kids this way and she laughed about sticking it to the company. Naturally, others had to cover for her absence and have to work the holidays.
Was there a pubic hair attached to Ms. Sisk’s letter?
If so, she’s got a good case.
Dhimmicretans same old fun and games…
Must herd all their females into one room,
They pass a hat with all the standard outrages listed,
Everyone is required to draw from the hat too decide who will represent what effrontery,
then commence practicing for their parts for the appearance before Congress.
I’ve been watching the Gorsuch hearings. He is a very impressive man whose answers show how ignorant and shallow the “lawmakers” on the left truly are.
If they had to think for their supper they’d starve.
I remember the two biggest ignoranuses in the Senate, Biden and Kennedy, and their treatment of Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas.
It was both irritating and embarrassing to watch. It’s the same here. I can’t watch but I get the meat from Levin, Rush, and Hannity.
BTW. Lindsay Graham is a jock strap sniffer.
If a Democrat politician ever had an original idea and a cold drink of water at the same time, it would kill him/her/it dead
I am probably judgemental and biased and a mean person, but I have seen this happen **all the time* esp at one previous employer. A guy gets hired and he is expected to work every day, year in, year out, in the office every day, late hours. Women get hired and here is what happens: they are pregnant within a year or two so they are out on maternity leave. They get benefits. The management somehow has to cover for their work while they are out, but they can’t release them and they can’t hire a new full-time person (everyone knows what huge pain this is and how hard it is to pull off). The woman comes back to work. Oh but she wants new hours to spend time w the kid. Either she needs to leave every day by 2, or wants every other day off. Of course now we have “teleworking” so that gets abused. big time. I worked with >1 woman who just moved out of town b/c their husband was moving and they just worked “off site” (and about .1 as valuable as the person there every day). In the meantime, the poor male schlub isn’t teleworking and he is in the office every day and b/c of that he is learning and contributing more and coming up with new solutions and new business opportunities, and becoming more valuable to the company. But don’t pay him more than the telecommuting woman who phones it in from home every 3rd day in her sweat pants!! You sexist!! Said woman does this for a while, and then she gets pregnant again. I saw this happen over, and over, and over. I discussed it with several guys in mgmnt and it really ticked off many of them. But women are abused, men are sexist, men get paid more, women never get the same opportunities as men. Oh did I mention that 95% of the complaints in the office are from malcontent women? Sorry for the rant, and I could go on.
The only rational response to this woman is: “So?”
So…
And…
Buck: You are dead on! When I supervised a team of 20, 90% of the personnel problems I had to deal with were women who couldn’t get along with each other and women who abused sick leave/ FEMLA. It was a giant pain in the ass.
When I got hired by the previous employer, I asked mgmnt about the prospect of taking off Friday afternoon occasionally (which would include an early am Friday start time) — “We would not to see you make a habit of that.” OK cool, got it, just asking. 2 months later one of my co-workers moved 1500 miles away and told the company she was going to “work” remotely and telecommute. As far as I could tell not a GD word was said. When I worked my up to the #1 position, 90% of my personnel problems were with uncooperative, incompetent, arrogant, touchy wymyn who had to be obeyed. The only people I hired personally were men (hah).