California Kills Vegan Restaurant Chain – IOTW Report

California Kills Vegan Restaurant Chain

SF Gate

For about 13 years, Sage was known as Sage Vegan Bistro (rather than its final name, Sage Regenerative Kitchen), and was a leader in the plant-based casual restaurant space, with multiple locations across Southern California. But in the spring of 2024, Engelhart announced a shift in direction for the brand, with plans to “focus on sourcing and proselytizing regenerative farming practices,” wrote the Los Angeles Times. 

That meant many things, Engelhart promised, including the addition of animal proteins to the restaurant’s menus. Longtime and avowed-vegan customers were not happy. More

I don’t know what that is on the right side of the plate in the article’s opening photo, but I wouldn’t put those in my mouth. – Dr. Tar

13 Comments on California Kills Vegan Restaurant Chain

  1. Ultimately you need customers. I’ve eaten at great vegan restaurants, but people need to not only come back but be willing to pay enough to support ridiculous minimum wage requirements, etc.

    3
  2. Get woke, go broke — EXCEPT if you work for or recieve money from the government. Just ask government-made millionaires pelosi, clinton, obama, merrick garland, aoc, tim walz, kamala harris, blm ‘execs’, etc

    2
  3. “This is what happens when a business claiming to be based around [values] crumbles to violent and oppressive systems that WILL devour it as well,”
    HAHAHA. Pussy.

    2
  4. “Should have stuck to your morals and responsibility instead of cash flow. Money is made up. The violence of animal products is not.”

    Money is made up? Maybe. but try paying your employees, mortgage banker, etc. with ‘morals’.

    IDIOTS.

    2
  5. Doc, that may be falafel, a fairly common middle-eastern staple.

    It resembles what the neighbor’s dogs leave out in the yard, except deep fried. I’ve had falafel. I’d rather have Chick ‘fil A. – Dr. Tar

    3
  6. Veganism is unsustainable — for people and the planet. The restaurant owner recognized that and likely knew what the response would be but made the statement anyway because she was already planning on pulling out of California, for the usual reasons.

    1
  7. “…ultimately still involve the violent death of an individual who did not want to die.”

    … you mean like … uh, ‘abortion’ … maybe?

    naaaaaaah

Comments are closed.