California Labels Kamala Harris’s Glock an ‘Unsafe Handgun,’ Barred From Sale by a Law She Supported – IOTW Report

California Labels Kamala Harris’s Glock an ‘Unsafe Handgun,’ Barred From Sale by a Law She Supported

Kamala Harris: ‘I Have a Glock’ Of Course I Fired It

Breitbart

When Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris told “60 Minutes” she owns a Glock pistol she did not mention residents in her home state of California cannot own one because of a law she supported.

California has an “Unsafe Handgun Act” (2001), which bars the importation and/or sale of any gun that does not meet certain safety requirements set by the state. Consequently, the state maintains an approved handguns roster, which lists the firearms the state has deemed safe, according to California standards.

The roster is what would-be California gun buyers reference to learn what handguns they can legally own. Read more

17 Comments on California Labels Kamala Harris’s Glock an ‘Unsafe Handgun,’ Barred From Sale by a Law She Supported

  1. She said it so generically, as a synonym for a gun. Like Kleenex.

    Most Glock owners automatically state the model number. She has small hands so would probably have a Glock 19.
    Bitch is as inauthentic as a $10 Rolex.
    SMDH

    17
  2. Glock has had episodes in which it was the flavor of the day or current thing and as a general rule has enjoyed popular acceptance due to that factor. There are also applications wherein it is among the top choices to select from. I’ve never really warmed up to it, but I had one under the seat of my Scout for a month or so that had no rear sight. It was in the “Tupperware” that G-19s came in and I needed to drop it off with a friend who was the factory service center to have the sight replaced under warranty. It was an adjustable sight model and half the sight flew off into the atmosphere the same day we sold it. We took it back and he took a fixed sight one after all. See, my advice to buy the fixed sight one wasn’t so bad after all. But I diverge, the gist of this story is I had a coffee can full of 9mm a guy gave me. All factory ammo. But I didn’t own a 9mm. All mixed up leftovers from partial boxes due to pilferage and whatever. My buddy and I happened to be at the range and decided to shoot it all up with the Glock with no rear sight. I’m here to tell you, that thing didn’t hiccup once and we were shooting baseball size groups at fifteen or twenty yards with it. All we really did to sort the ammo was try and load the lighter weight bullet loads in the same magazines and the heavier likewise. Other that that early adjustable sight issue, we never had any problems with them other than a comfortable holster for a Glock was a pipe dream back then. Even though I didn’t care for the trigger action, I sure didn’t have any problem getting respectable accuracy shooting it. Particularly with no rear sight on it.

    They are as ugly as a Democrat protester though.

    10
  3. Massachusetts bans Glock pistols with a very similar law to CAUSE. (Wouldn’t surprise me if the MA Legislature just copied the CA law.)
    Basically any handgun capable of accepting a magazine that can hold more than 10 rounds is illegal, even if the magazine you physically own only holds 10 or fewer.
    Another of the reasons I fled MA as soon as the opportunity presented itself.

    6
  4. She lives in DC. I think you need to have a permit and register your guns there.

    So, has any ‘journalist’ checked on that? Should be able to find out pretty easily if she’s telling the truth –and if she has obeyed the local gun laws.

    10
  5. Bull Shit story. I have a Gen 3 Glock attached to my hip right now. Gen 3 Glocks are legal in California. She said she purchased it in 2010 I believe. That would have been a Gen 3. I hate when our side stoops to their level.

    3

Comments are closed.