England: Court Rules Medical Staff Can Restrain Woman & Perform Abortion

WJ: A judge in England has given doctors permission to perform an abortion on a young woman with severe learning disabilities, according to Yahoo News.

As of now, the source of the pregnancy is unclear. An investigation is underway, and the current assumption is that she was either raped or impregnated by a man with similar disabilities, the report said.

DNA tests are being conducted to establish the identity of the father.

The decision was made by the euphemistically named Court of Protection in London, which specializes in cases involving people who lack the mental capacity to make decisions for themselves, Yahoo reported.

The woman, who was not identified, is in her 20s but has the mental age of a young child. read more

16 Comments on England: Court Rules Medical Staff Can Restrain Woman & Perform Abortion

  1. If these kinds of rulings continue to be made around the world then I fear there will be a large number of judges prematurely released from their duties and it may not always be pleasant for them!

    3
  2. In hindsight saving France and England from the Nazis wasn’t worth a single American life or dollar, if it were not for America’s interests in defeating the Nazis it would have been a total waste of American lives and treasury to get involved

    12
  3. while I agree abortion is a tragedy, the real tragedy is that this poor woman was impregnated in the first place. seriously, everyone who wants to adopt a mentally challenged, severely deformed, crack addicted, or fetal alcohol affected child…raise your hand.

    4
  4. This is just a test case for the purpose of establishing the precedent. Just wait till they really put it into practice.

    15
  5. As one of the Anons said, Hitler and his boys perfected this method decades ago.
    What goes around, comes around.

    OT. Please stop with the “anonymous” entries. If you aren’t able to man or women up to a steady screen name, then don’t reply to any heading.
    If you can’t think of any “Name” then a number works. Just so anyone replying to you has an idea who he his replying to. This isn’t rocket surgery.
    Good or bad, I and many, many others have always put our screen names on our entries. Yes, we’ve been sometimes hammered for our thoughts and beliefs, but we still write without fear.
    Jump on in, the waters fine.

    9
  6. F4UCorsair — I agree. We don’t need to know WHO you are, we just need to know who you are.

    Heck, I’ve even slipped and used my real name a few times going with auto fill and not thinking about it.

    7
  7. ontoiran,
    Are you saying that the baby should be aborted?

    As for who would want to adopt a mentally challenged baby, I would do so in a heartbeat. Many people do so every day. Although, just because the girl is mentally challenged does not mean her child would be. It’s not like this would be the first case of a mentally retarded woman giving birth to a child and many of them the babies were perfectly normal.
    As for all the other babies mentioned, people adopt them every day as well and I would also be willing to adopt one.

    The first part is true it is a tragedy she was impregnated, especially if she was raped. Not knowing the laws across the pond, I do not know if they have laws not allowing the mentally challenged to be sterilized without their consent.

    6
  8. Fortunately groups of humans respecting life made it away from England to the United States.
    ‘Seriously, everyone who wants to adopt a mentally challenged, severely deformed, crack addicted, or fetal alcohol affected child…raise your hand.’
    It’s been being done daily in the US for a long time.
    How else do you explain the existence of the Democratic party,,,

    3
  9. @Anonymous October 18, 2019 at 4:34 pm

    > if it were not for America’s interests in defeating the Nazis

    It was for “The United States” interests, and directly against the “Americans” interests. And the Americans knew it. At the time. And the Americans said it. At the time. And The United Statesians sung “But our country! Tis of thee…”. And the Americans said “Well, as long as you call it ‘our’…” and galumphed off to the genocide.

    I’m sorry. Is this where I should put a feather in my hair MAGA hat on my head, a glycerin tear on my cheek, and look somber? “‘Losing’ ‘patriots’ to the tree chipper of history is such, sweet, sweet sorrow.”

Comments are closed.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!