No, Middle Eastern refugees can’t be compared to Holocaust victims – IOTW Report

No, Middle Eastern refugees can’t be compared to Holocaust victims

AmericanThinker: President Trump has issued a modified version of his previous immigration policy executive order that was stalled a month ago by a lower-level federal judge in the state of Washington.  Mr. Trump has been under relentless attack from those on the left against his efforts to limit immigration from terrorist-producing areas and his call for comprehensive vetting and background checks.

Beyond doubt, it is the first and most important duty of a president to protect the lives of a country’s citizens, especially where a possibility exists of terrorists being embedded within a particular immigration flow. As the president previously stated, not to strictly enforce our immigration laws is “not compassion, but recklessness.”

Some are exploiting the Holocaust to promote unrestricted Syrian and other Mideast immigration into this country.  However, it is incorrect to draw a parallel between the Jews who fled Europe in the 1930s, who were, as Jews, specific targets for genocide and Nazi concentration camps, and those today wishing to escape the civil war in their Mideast countries.  The Syrians, for example, are not being targeted because they are Muslims, and there is no Final Solution planned against them.  Their civil wars have placed them in difficult circumstances, but their situation is not comparable to the deliberate and planned Final Extermination specifically directed at Jews as Jews during the once-in-history Holocaust. It’s a different category altogether.

Furthermore, comparisons to the Holocaust situation are improper, for (2) there were no Nazi agents embedded within the fleeing Jews, (3) the Jews did not harbor a cultural or religious ideology wishing to sow physical destruction among the American people, and (4) there were no rabbis in the 1930s sending forth commands worldwide to destroy the “infidels.”  Indeed, (5) the completely innocent Jews of Europe had nowhere to go, no country to take them in – there was not yet a State of Israel – whereas there are 57 Islamic states, many exceedingly wealthy, who could be providing safe haven to their Islamic brothers.

MORE HERE

11 Comments on No, Middle Eastern refugees can’t be compared to Holocaust victims

  1. Why aren’t the Jews demanding that Israel take in all these poor refugees? Are they islamophobes?

    Maybe it’s because of the rapes, murders, explosions, and native-population genocide that inevitably follow islamic colonization?

    Why the fuck should anybody else tolerate that shit – especially when the people who are ceaselessly pushing this insanity on us, won’t tolerate it in *their* country?

  2. @Sound Policy – The UN has been co-opted by Arabs.
    Comparing Middle East “Refugees” to Holocaust victims is simply more blatant pandering to Western Liberal stupidity! It is made even more obscene when you consider that these are the followers of Yasser Arafat and Amin Al Husseini, the grand mufti of Hitler’s Arabs! Along with the conquest and domination of the West, it is all about Arab supremacy. The ignorant Left has no clue because history isn’t taught in schools anymore! We’re in a war and all the silly Left can do is call you a bigot and racist! Meanwhile the Arabs are hoping that by the time they figure it out it will be too late.

Comments are closed.